2009 MLB Season Thread
#1
Posted January 9, 2009 - 18:47
First post, Cubs new owner may push for Peavy.
#2
Posted January 9, 2009 - 20:02
BTW....how bad will San Diego be this year? Any guesses? 2003 Tigers bad?
I love "hockey". I hate "hockey fans".
All of our victories are moral.
#3
Posted January 9, 2009 - 20:58
rams80, on Friday, January 9th, 2009 - 20:02:24, said:
BTW....how bad will San Diego be this year? Any guesses? 2003 Tigers bad?
I hope not. Let's start with playoff picks once Manny and Dunn have signed. I'm gonna start working on mine.




(WFA) San Juan Conquistadors (2-8) - (MiLF) Hawai'i Tropics (2-0) - (CHLA) Mahoning Manatees (0-0-0) - (CHL) Indianapolis Checkers (6-30-4)
Lime Green and More
My all new jersey blog.
#4
Posted January 10, 2009 - 01:17
Well, I'm hoping that the Braves don't get played for fools ONCE AGAIN. But Kawakami seems like he'd be pretty decent. Middle-of-the order type of guy. I'd definitely welcome him here.
Kawakami on Youtube.
I really hope that this happens...
Hudson
Lowe
Vazquez
Kawakami
Jurrjens
Would (SHOULD) be a pretty nice rotation. I just hope that it all comes together. I'm tired of seeing the Braves get the runaround.
#5
Posted January 10, 2009 - 01:22
TFoA, on Friday, January 9th, 2009 - 23:17:41, said:
Well, I'm hoping that the Braves don't get played for fools ONCE AGAIN. But Kawakami seems like he'd be pretty decent. Middle-of-the order type of guy. I'd definitely welcome him here.
Kawakami on Youtube.
I really hope that this happens...
Hudson
Lowe
Vazquez
Kawakami
Jurrjens
Would (SHOULD) be a pretty nice rotation. I just hope that it all comes together. I'm tired of seeing the Braves get the runaround.
Always helps to plant your teams flag in Japan!

#6
Posted January 10, 2009 - 18:14
TFoA, on Saturday, January 10th, 2009 - 01:17:41, said:
Well, I'm hoping that the Braves don't get played for fools ONCE AGAIN. But Kawakami seems like he'd be pretty decent. Middle-of-the order type of guy. I'd definitely welcome him here.
Kawakami on Youtube.
I really hope that this happens...
Hudson
Lowe
Vazquez
Kawakami
Jurrjens
Would (SHOULD) be a pretty nice rotation. I just hope that it all comes together. I'm tired of seeing the Braves get the runaround.
They got him.
#7
Posted January 10, 2009 - 18:25
I'm happy that this got done, and this helps to possibly get Lowe in here as well. Now if we can get Lowe to come here, and Glavine makes a another crack at a comeback, the rotation will be stout.
#8
Posted January 13, 2009 - 18:08
Good job. This will be a great rotation this year...and it'll be even better when Hudson gets back. 2010's going to be interesting. Too bad 2009's probably gonna be another wash if the bullpen continues to blow games like they did last year.
#9
Posted January 13, 2009 - 21:24
TFoA, on Tuesday, January 13th, 2009 - 18:08:05, said:
Good job. This will be a great rotation this year...and it'll be even better when Hudson gets back. 2010's going to be interesting. Too bad 2009's probably gonna be another wash if the bullpen continues to blow games like they did last year.
Alright! Another bat maybe?
#11
Posted January 13, 2009 - 22:09
Drew22, on Tuesday, January 13th, 2009 - 21:24:23, said:
TFoA, on Tuesday, January 13th, 2009 - 18:08:05, said:
Good job. This will be a great rotation this year...and it'll be even better when Hudson gets back. 2010's going to be interesting. Too bad 2009's probably gonna be another wash if the bullpen continues to blow games like they did last year.
Alright! Another bat maybe?
It'll have to come through trade or someone really cheap. Maybe Nady (definitely not cheap) or Swisher?
#12
Posted January 14, 2009 - 13:24
Quote
ANAHEIM, Calif. -- The city of Anaheim is dropping its legal challenges to the name of the Angels.
Mayor Curt Pringle says the City Council voted unanimously Tuesday to give up its battle to restore the team's name to the Anaheim Angels.
The city had argued that team owner Arte Moreno violated the city-owned stadium lease agreement when he changed the name to the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim in 2005.
A California appeals court ruled against the city last month, and an Orange County Superior court jury sided with the team in 2006.
Pringle says city leaders believe the wrong court decision was made twice, but says "it's in everybody's best interest to take no further action."
Copyright 2009 by The Associated Press
#13
Posted January 14, 2009 - 13:33
StarrDogg, on Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 - 10:24:30, said:
Quote
ANAHEIM, Calif. -- The city of Anaheim is dropping its legal challenges to the name of the Angels.
Mayor Curt Pringle says the City Council voted unanimously Tuesday to give up its battle to restore the team's name to the Anaheim Angels.
The city had argued that team owner Arte Moreno violated the city-owned stadium lease agreement when he changed the name to the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim in 2005.
A California appeals court ruled against the city last month, and an Orange County Superior court jury sided with the team in 2006.
Pringle says city leaders believe the wrong court decision was made twice, but says "it's in everybody's best interest to take no further action."
Copyright 2009 by The Associated Press
Yeah we were never going to win that lawsuit, because even though how terrible that sounds as a name, it was within the guidelines and stipulations of the lease to keep Anaheim in the team name. I think that Anaheim took the lawsuit just out of principal because that's what it was. It was a terrible decision by Arte and it pissed off the majority of the fanbase. Anaheim had to defend itself because the Angels are one of the things that put Anaheim on the map (along with Disneyland). Most of the fans got over it after a while. A lot still call the team Anaheim (like myself) others still call it California, there are some who abide and say Los Angeles (the national media at the forefront because its a long ass name), and there is a big group that just simply call them the Angels with no other designation.
Basically, Anaheim was never going to win and this issue has been long passed over. Thank the speediness of the civil court system

| Ducks: (6-9-3) 15 Pts - 11/19 vs Lightning | Angels: (97-65) - AL West Champions |
| Colts: (9-0) - 11/22 @ Ravens | #18 USC Football: (7-3)(4-3) - 11/28 vs UCLA |
| Lakers: (8-3) - 11/19 vs Bulls | USC Basketball: (1-0) - 11/21 vs Loyola Marymount |
| Manchester United: | EPL - (8-3-1) 25 Pts - 11/21 vs Everton | UCL - Group B - (3-0-1) 10 Pts - 11/25 vs Besiktas |
#15
Posted January 14, 2009 - 14:52
BringBackTheVet, on Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 - 13:17:17, said:
Unfortunately, I believe it is simply the latter.
Right Behind You, Everyone is With You
Break the Line and Follow Down the Field
And You'll Be
On the Top, Upon the Top
Fight, Tigers, You will Always Win
Proudly Keep the Colors Flying Skyward
In the End We'll Win the Vic-to-ry
So Tigers Fight for Old Mizzou
#16
#17
Posted January 14, 2009 - 15:17
LMU, on Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 - 14:11:42, said:
They never even use "Los Angeles" in merchandising anyway. In all my catalogs from vendors who do MLB and MiLB merchandise, like t-shirt designs, they always say "Angels Baseball", even when the other teams' stuff say Location/Nickname, such as St. Louis Cardinals. In some, where it'll say "Location" above "Nickname" and somewhere towards the bottom of the design, "Baseball Club", they will leave off the location and just put "Baseball" instead of "Baseball Club".
Right Behind You, Everyone is With You
Break the Line and Follow Down the Field
And You'll Be
On the Top, Upon the Top
Fight, Tigers, You will Always Win
Proudly Keep the Colors Flying Skyward
In the End We'll Win the Vic-to-ry
So Tigers Fight for Old Mizzou
#18
Posted January 14, 2009 - 15:21
McCall, on Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 - 12:17:09, said:
LMU, on Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 - 14:11:42, said:
They never even use "Los Angeles" in merchandising anyway. In all my catalogs from vendors who do MLB and MiLB merchandise, like t-shirt designs, they always say "Angels Baseball", even when the other teams' stuff say Location/Nickname, such as St. Louis Cardinals. In some, where it'll say "Location" above "Nickname" and somewhere towards the bottom of the design, "Baseball Club", they will leave off the location and just put "Baseball" instead of "Baseball Club".
I think that's largely a branding issue. Moreno has made an effort to promote the team more as a brand than anything, which is why he removed the navy background from the primary logo. A couple years ago, the team's billboard/bus stop campaign was just to have the A on a red background.
Hopefully though, the end of the legal proceedings will allow for LA to sneak in more places than box scores and the "Los Angeles Times" ad on the right field scoreboard.



Sign In
Register
Help



MultiQuote










