Jump to content

_RH_

Members
  • Posts

    1,099
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

_RH_ last won the day on November 18 2012

_RH_ had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

8,565 profile views

_RH_'s Achievements

1k

Reputation

  1. I, for one, am pretty excited about the new Denver Turtles new uniforms! I do think it's a bit over the top that Nike would use their swoosh as the turtle's eye, but I guess that's some artistic flair! But honestly ... I'm not going to be able to look at these without seeing that turtle profile!
  2. If the Lions really did want the metallic sheen on pants but "although they will lack the sheen of some of the franchise's earlier looks because of limitations with the fabric Nike utilizes " how is this acceptable? A huge comapny is unable to fulfill the request of one of the biggest businesses in the world? A request for a product that existed 40 years ago?! Unacceptable. Im not terribly impressed by the striping: the helmet centerline ratio seems different than the pants. And the shoulder silver/white will look poor from any distance. Now for an unpopular opinion: going from their unique font to block is a step backward.
  3. Usa white/blue photos look great! The collar is great as focal point. On the other hand, the blue/red look is about as garish as it gets! Yuck.
  4. What's worse, the kit matchup or the free kick?
  5. I've posted a few times through the years on the Avs removing black, and generally agree with my past-self: For me, the shades of red and blue cannot touch, so the current look is poor. I will say, looking back at the black breezers they do look weird now. I'm surprised they havent tried the trend of "colored helmet on the road". Those 6 versions I doodled still feel more consistent than anything they've worn... white breezers feel intriguing since they'd balance the "very dark" color scheme.
  6. I think Carolina's primary is mostly good, but the puck has always looked upside down to me. Maybe that could be tweaked to form a "c" without being quite as blatant as upper right. The logo is jagged, the "c" should follow suit. I don't care much for the script logos (the white third is a sharp template but nickname scripts feel weak to me)
  7. Looks good to me! And since we're talking Denver's shade of blue:
  8. Iceland is looking very nice tonight
  9. (Jets) I presume this is unpopular, but I didn't at all mind the "wedge" jerseys. To me that was a unique element that wasn't too over the top. If that set deleted all black it'd be very good, IMO.
  10. Weird matchup today: For some reason this was hard for me to quickly identify; not very pleasant on the eyes!
  11. Interesting. To me the original is clearly inspired by the local native art, and therefore vastly superior.
  12. Eagles: 1. Likely unpopular, but I think the darker shade and black trim (not black jersey or pants) is superior to the throwbacks . I'll draw a parallel to the Calgary Flames where adding black and toning down the main color makes it more aesthetically pleasing. 2. How many times do teams totally disregard their opponent's colors color scheme when planning alt colors. If youre Philly, why wear your brighter green against another team with a brighter green shade!? Anyone in their division would've been preferable
  13. I may not be a smart man, but I know when jerseys aren't the same color as helmets It's 2023, how is this still so imperfect?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.