Pizzaman7294

Members
  • Content count

    937
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

68 Excellent

About Pizzaman7294

  1. I thought Pitt-Indy was color rush, no?
  2. Sorry if this has been mentioned already, but the shoulder tomahawk "C's" is still incorrect on the Blackhawks
  3. I honestly would have paid full price for a red version of this.
  4. Gotham font, if someone wants to throw it together.
  5. Any thoughts on where the Cubs could put a new "banner"? Think theyll honestly put up another flag on the roof that no one can see?
  6. Never know...
  7. I thought you meant this one:
  8. It's honestly not a bad option. I appreciate that they're offering a cheaper version, but I'm having a very hard time thinking $80 is worth it for THAT. I'd think about it for $50.
  9. Last year's font was only an outline....this year's have it filled in. (3rd season with Adidas)
  10. I'm not sure what you're trying to do with your "list" but leaving Chicago and Green Bay off of it is asinine.
  11. (as not an insider)... my guess is the pants are available but not the jerseys since there seems to be little to no rule about them. We've seen pants come out of nowhere in the past couple years from Carolina (black pants) and Baltimore (gold pants). Again. just a guess
  12. Great thoughts from everyone. I think the missing part of all of this (confusion on the schedule, etc.) is these jerseys clearly seem to be for more than 2016... like they might even be "permanent". So therefore, these are literally an alternate uniform for the team IF they play on TNF. My assumption is the NFL 5 year rule will apply to these as well.
  13. A look at New England's Limited jersey