darkpiranha

Members
  • Content count

    1,090
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

159 Excellent

About darkpiranha

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Houston

Recent Profile Visitors

7,200 profile views
  1. Easily the best logo swap series I've ever seen. Every one of these is a winner (except Buffalo, but that's only because nothing from Buffalo ever wins)
  2. Updating my logo! I retired from fantasy football in 2012 after a successful 25 year run, but an unexpected opening in the league I founded in 1988 (I've been out of that league since 1994) has lured me out of retirement. So that means the Dark Piranhas are back, and I need to get some merch made before the season starts! And more specifically, that means it's time to update my logo. I've had the current one since 2006 and it's time for a tweak. Here's a pictorial history of my logo from its inception in 1988. While I cringe a little at some of the earlier elements, they are now part of the Dark Piranhas legacy, and while a complete overhaul was an option, tradition wins out, so the new version must pay homage to the history and heritage, no matter how unfortunate some of those earlier choices might have been. A little history to keep in mind before diving too deeply into C&C: Over time, the Dark Piranhas came to represent me in any sports-related endeavor, either fantasy, or coaching little league or playing intramural. While the color scheme has been predominantly silver and black, starting in 2006 blood red was added in various capacities (sometimes a dominant color like in the sample helmet, sometimes only as an accent). The logo itself has evolved from a crude fish-head in 1988, to adding some head spikes and putting it in a roundel in 1990, to a full-body fish with over-exaggerated teeth in 1994, to the sharp, angular style it acquired in 2006. The one consistent element in all iterations has been the pair of gills. The eyes started off a more realistic round before becoming more sharp and angular and basically, the shape of a V, which is what my first name starts with (Victor). In fact, the 2006 version of the logo was reverse-engineered starting with the eye, which was the one element I definitely wanted to keep. I liked the overall look of the 2006 logo, but one consistent problem was my early decision to make the fins and teeth separate elements from the body, almost like paper cutouts. Looks okay in usage or over any color except black or white, which required me to put a stroke on it,but the black stroke didn't work on the body, and a white stroke didn't work on the teetch. Plus those cutout shapes made any stroke look really wonky. It was a mess! The bottom image of the history graphic shows my Oregon-inspired set of helmets and uniforms for 2012 (my retirement season). So here's my first version of the 2016 update: With my latest iteration, I've kept the basic look, but streamlined it and simplified it. First, I reconnected all the fins and added a couple of head spikes back in honor of the 1990 version of the logo. The biggest change I made was making the teeth black. I thought that it would really bug me, but I quickly grew to like it. I also elongated the body a bit and skewed its angle a bit to give it a more aggressive feeling. The three versions above differ only in how the teeth are presented. (A) has them separated as in my 2006 logo. It still allows for a legible stroke. This also allows me to color them white in some usages of the logo, such as over a solid color. (B) has the teeth connected to the 'lips' allowing the entire logo to be self-contained. (C) moves the 'lips' back to where they are more of a suggestion, making the teeth and jaw a more singular silhouette. The bottom graphic just shows how the whole thing looks stroked. I'm more or less happy with it, but I'd very much like to hear any feedback. Of the three versions above, I have a personal preference, but I'll let you guys weigh in. Thanks in advance!
  3. I actually like this version of the logo better than the thick-neck version. The other one says bird-of-prey-with-long-beak, not flamingo. It would be like showing a giraffe with only a short neck. It would look more like a horse.
  4. I can't take credit for it. I just used Photoshop's new "Content-aware design" feature. It did the rest of the magic.
  5. Great implementation. I would not be opposed if they went with this version of the logo full time.
  6. Love the look, but agree that in order for it to be a flamingo, the neck needs to look like a flamingo. That's one of the two main elements that are iconic about flamingos, the other being the color.
  7. Nice.
  8. Are you looking for advice/feedback? Or are you wanting someone to just do it for you? If so, here's what I was able to come up with in two minutes.
  9. I think you should use all three combos for the Palms. Give a fun backstory about what conditions dictate which color combo the team will use.
  10. Maybe instead of gold, an electric yellow, not unlike the Chargers.
  11. Announce how much the "donation" is, so anyone interested can decide if it's worth their while. This logo is presumably going to be on all the hats, t-shirts, cups, and other merchandise you want to sell. Surely that's worth something to you.
  12. Looking epic.
  13. You should resize these for phone screens. They almost fit as is.
  14. Popcorn box is filled.
  15. Nice start. I think you can eliminate the "Las" from it. Vegas is one of the few (if not only) "Los/Las" city names that you can eliminate the prefix and you still have a name that many people refer to the city as. The Las feels like it's tacked on. I'm not seeing it as an upside down A. Try making the internal triangle black as well.