duxrcool048

Members
  • Content count

    50
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

28 Excellent

About duxrcool048

  1. Then I guess the numbers and name on the back of the jersey should be too, because they're not that dark of a blue.
  2. So does that mean the 49ers can't change their jerseys for 5 years now that they changed the stripes on the sleeves?
  3. Yeah it's bad. In that middle picture it really stands out. From a distance it's not bad, but it's still not good.
  4. http://www.therams.com/photos/photo-gallery/PHOTOS-Behind-the-Scenes-at-2017-Rams-Media-Day/450ff240-170d-467e-9934-01a2002eac26#19331f93-511e-4631-9b19-c6dccb6e5ed6
  5. I'm sorry. That was from Wikipedia. My point was that originally just before the Rams made this switch, somebody posted that they couldn't have a gray facemask because it wasn't part of their color palette. What I didn't understand is if the Bills can have gray facemasks, why couldn't the Rams. But I guess what I saw on Wikipedia was incorrect. So gray is part of the Bills color palette then.
  6. I know this is a repost of one of my earlier posts in this thread. But since we're talking about the facemask color, I thought it would be relevant to bring it back up.
  7. That's what I was thinking. They're just using old stock. We will see the new jerseys eventually.
  8. That's what I don't understand either. This picture shows the new template.
  9. Here's another one I saw of Josh Reynolds. Not sure if anyone else has seen it.
  10. You beat me to it lol. I just saw this too. That was the first thing I thought. Does that just mean another season with these mismatched uniforms?
  11. Sorry if this sounds stupid, but I don't understand what you mean? How will it look "like it's supposed to?"