CLEstones

Uhg. The Guardians font is so bad. The script has grown on me (was never a fan of the Jndians script). But the block letters are so bad. The previous block C was such a great look, a great monogram, and had such a historic presence to it, that could have added another layer of connectivity to the previous brand.

Please please please tell me there is a .PSD version of this template. Please.

The Bucs was pretty bad, too. Those are probably the top 3. But the Jarvis Landry Browns uniforms were terrible.

Once the Texans get done releasing the rest of their uniforms... I'm going to be so happy that the Browns will no longer hold the title for worst uniform redesign in NFL history.

Are there any baseball uniform templates for .PSD? Jersey, pants, socks, hat... helmet and cleats not necessary, but appreciated.

This.

I'm looking for suggestions on fonts for a logo I'm trying to develop. The first font, I am thinking something a little bit more classic/block/basic, that would would look good on the front of a whiskey bottle or on a whiskey label. The second, is something a little more fun, but still someone reserved, maybe something a little wavier, but would illicit thoughts about movies and going to the movies. Thanks for any help.

Oof. These are going to be worse than the original Browns redesign from 2015.

You think they are going to have 4 entirely different uniforms, with entirely different designs and color pallets?

Bummer. Thanks anyway. Does anyone have a decent/easy .PSD template for hoops unis? Thanks.

Anyone got this template in PSD?

Cleveland and Bone Thugs n Harmony. We need it.

Yes, all we need is ANOTHER R/W/B team in profession/college sports. Why are so many professional franchise and branding companies so averse to having color and originality?

This script font! Where did you get it? Elite.

Only thing I would say with the DSC is that the S should be diagonal or something... or the top and bottom of the S should create the bottom of the D and top of the C. The logo is too horizontal and pointy... and rigid. I cant describe it.

That Marlins font is on point. Custom?

So, you think a gradient is a modern trend and NOT one firmly planted in the 90s?

It's not too busy. But the scale and placement is poor.

Pass. This is a massive hop, step, and a jump backwards from their current set, and previous set, and the set before that, and the set before that.

I'm fine with that. At least it's moving in the right direction.

Not a home run... but an upgrade from the previous set. I would have liked to see some form of the sword slash from the 90s make it's way to the uniforms, maybe on the shorts. They are at least trying to unify the set by dropping the navy and sticking with 3 colors. The font is terrible but at least it's consistent across the jerseys. The V-net was a missed opportunity on the CLEVELAND jersey. I would have liked to see the wine in-stroke on the black uniform font. Maybe black in-stroke on the wine uniform font. Other than that, I dont HATE them. This is the current trend right now, so it kinda is what it is... It could be a hell of a lot worse. I think an under designed uniform is way better than over designed uniform.

So how soon do Clemson and Florida State they are announcing they are leaving the ACC?

If the USC/UCLA news is true... I would bet the B1G and SEC are going to race for Clemson and Florida State as the next big 2 dominoes to fall. When all this started happening in 2010, it was rumored the B1G wants to get to 18 teams. Clemson and FSU would do that. Not sure if it's possible. Not sure if 18 is the endgame anymore. At this rate, no one is safe. I would think other schools in play for the B1G include Colorado, North Carolina, Oregon, any of the Texas schools, and Notre Dame. I assume this news is going to cause an immediate SEC meeting and they are going to extend invites out to Florida State and Clemson sooner rather than later. The PAC and XII could make a decent 3rd/4th conference, assuming everything else stays the same... Washington, Washington State, Oregon, Oregon State, Cal, Stanford, Arizona, Arizona State, Utah, Colorado, Iowa State, Cinci, WV, Baylor, KSU, Kansas, OK-State, Texas Tech, TCU, BYU, UCF, and Houston. There is just no way more of those schools dont get poached.

RE: Cavs Good: Getting rid of the navy. It was too close to black and caused unnecessary confusion. The black, wine, and athletic gold is a really nice color pallet. Black pretty much had to stay, since they won the title in black, so it only made sense. The C-shield is an upgrade from the previous version. In general, the unnecessary drop shadow/strokes over-designing is gone. Bad: The loss of the C-sword. It was a nice logo. It seemed very identifiable with the Cavs. The greatest era in Cleveland basketball history is now gone from the identity. The middle stripe within the CAVS wordmark would have been a nice touch, but the stripe is too thick and the font is too thin to make it work. Ugly: The font. This over-serif font trend is so bad. Frankly, I'm shocked it's lasted this long. I LOVE a good, unique font. I think every team in sports should have a unique font. But man, this trend has gots ta go. Areas to Improve: I think they need to bring back some sort of sword imagery. They have no logo identity anymore, no symbolism. It's just wordmarks. As I state above, the sword was a staple in the greatest era of Cleveland basketball (and arguably Cleveland sports) history. If they insist on have the V-net logo, then I wish they would try to develop something with crossing swords that they used on their court (https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cleveland.com%2Fcavshq%2F2010%2F08%2Fcavshq_wednesday_-_the_schedul.html&psig=AOvVaw0C3wRrk0VuBtCEtSZjoJNn&ust=1654446084937000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAwQjRxqFwoTCJiAlI2alPgCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAD) and made the V. If that didn't work, then they could have used some sort of battle flag (https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fsports-logos.fandom.com%2Fwiki%2FCleveland_Cavaliers&psig=AOvVaw2ujuqzOB7doNoDzXcLI330&ust=1654446135507000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAwQjRxqFwoTCKjCvqqalPgCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAD) like the LeBron 1.0 era. At worst, they could have incorporated the shield as the V to make it cohesive. The Cavs have always been a hot mess so I'm not sure why anyone is annoyed by the rebrand or expected anything different. Lastly - I thought there was a new rule in the NBA that each team had to have a roundel logo or some sort of basketball imagery in their primary logo? Did I misread that or did that change after a couple years?

I like how you unified the Guardians with 4 different workmarks.