Jump to content

Josh.0

Members
  • Posts

    381
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Josh.0

  1. I don't know how I feel about this? I mean, I guess it works? But, they're so drab.
  2. Here's one of Antoine Walker when he was traded back to Boston. He played in #88 for a couple of games IIRC before getting his #8 back from Al Jefferson who switched to #7.
  3. It'd be a toss up between Boston and New Jersey. But, he spent a few productive years with Portland too. Kenny had a couple other "wrong" uniforms ...
  4. In relation to KJ and his trade to Phoenix. It's weird seeing KJ and Nance in their new jerseys with different numbers. They switched to their customary #7 and #22 the following year.
  5. Agreed. But, I love single digit numbers on WRs and RBs as in college.
  6. Probably Fresno --- but, man I'd love for the Grizzlies to be back in the AHL.
  7. I don't know -- I kinda like Po'Boys. But, yeah, they kinda suck.
  8. That number is placed horribly! I think Phil Jackson was also a player-coach if I am not mistaken?
  9. Don't touch the logo. But, the jerseys could use a little refresher? Honestly, though, I'd love to see them bring this road back ...
  10. Luckily, that's stopped in the NBA. I remember for years seeing K.Malone and J.Malone on the Jazz jerseys. I also believe M.Malone and J.Malone happened on the Bullets? I think the NBA stopped doing that around 2003-04ish when Rasheed Wallace was traded to Detroit and teamed up with Big Ben.
  11. It's from the 1992 NBA All-Star Game (pre-Shaq) in Orlando -- Robinson forgot or lost his Spurs warmups.
  12. Much more wrong than the Pacers -- by a mile (or ten)
  13. Looks like the Raiders are negotiating with Oakland on a one year contract for the Coliseum. Lurking and waiting to see what the Chargers do I guess? http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14694084/oakland-raiders-owner-mark-davis-says-team-negotiating-remain-oakland-oco-coliseum-2016-season
  14. The main NFL relocation thread is rather large and let's be honest -- mostly about Los Angeles and the Rams. So, I thought since the Rams are officially in LA and we're now waiting for the Chargers decision (which will probably be an affirmative) that leaves the Raiders out there -- somewhere -- looking for a home. Do they stay in Oakland? Do they move in with the 49ers? Replace the Chargers in San Diego? Or move into a new NFL market like London, San Antonio, Las Vegas, Portland -- or wherever? So, I guess this thread is half speculation and half news on their situation.
  15. Spanos' plan is not to force Davis elsewhere and then stay in SD so there won't be a second team in LA. There will be a second team in LA. If Davis were to move to STL (as opposed to some of the absurd cities on your list) then the league would get some other team to go to LA or expand. Yeah, I see your point ... I guess more than what Spanos does I am interested to see what happens with the Raiders. I wouldn't be surprised to see them move to San Antonio this year, but I wouldn't be surprised if they did a one or two year lease at Levi's Stadium. I don't see that as a long term solution -- but, it could force the hand of Oakland to get something going with a new stadium. But, if they're leaving Oakland -- it's San Antonio or San Diego in my opinion.
  16. Lots of chatter on the interwebs about the Raiders looking into San Antonio. I know this was rumored last year, but with San Diego holding the cards for second LA franchise. This is interesting. Does Davis move for 2016? Does he wait to see what Spanos does or just move to San Antonio? Does Spano move in 2016 to LA? Does he wait his full year? Lots of questions ... Personally, I think Spanos takes that year and tries to force the hand of Davis. I think he wants him to relocate elsewhere now so he can either make the move to LA or stay in SD without the threat of having a second franchise move in with the Rams. Ideally, I'd like to Davis stay in Oakland, but I don't think that's going to happen. So if he moves to Texas that will be benefical for the Chargers to stay in San Diego and protect their "interests" and 25% business in the LA market. Anyways -- I think San Antonio is probably the best market for the Raiders outside of LA to relocate. Of course there's also St. Louis, Las Vegas, Portland, Toronto, Orlando and Omaha that I could see supporting a team. What's everyone's thoughts?
  17. I really think in the end the Chargers make the move north -- mainly to keep the Raiders out of LA. Especially if they truly believe it'd tap into their market too much to have two LA teams. But, if/when they move it'd be interesting to see if they protected the San Diego market from a relocated or expansion team? Or at least ask for compensation to a new team? It will be interesting to see what this means to the Raiders. I'd love to see them stay in the Bay Area, but if they moved LA would be, in my opinion, the only reasonable move. But, who knows? San Diego? San Antonio? St. Louis? Portland? Las Vegas? Chicago?
  18. It's probably more so to do with that Al Davis' corpse bred.
  19. Agreed -- especially since the Raiders really teamed up with the Chargers because they can't afford to move themselves. Not sure what that means with the Chargers ... but, I see them eventually teaming up with the Rams in Inglewood. The only issue I see being there is Stan's willingness to share revenue and profits to Spanos liking. As far as what that means for the Raiders? Not sure? I could see them sticking in the Bay Area teaming up with the 49ers in Santa Clara -- or building a new stadium in Oakland while temporarily playing in Santa Clara? I just have a hard time seeing them move to San Antonio, Oklahoma City, St. Louis, Portland or wherever. The only place that makes sense for Raider nation is the Bay Area or LA.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.