Jump to content

MJD7

Members
  • Posts

    2,553
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    54

MJD7 last won the day on March 23

MJD7 had the most liked content!

3 Followers

About MJD7

Social Media

Profile Information

  • Favorite Teams
    Minnesota Twins, Minnesota Vikings, Florida State Seminoles

Recent Profile Visitors

11,383 profile views

MJD7's Achievements

9.3k

Reputation

  1. This makes sense. From the moment the Texans started teasing the "H-Town blue," it looked more Panthers/Chargers electric blue to me than it did Titans/Oilers baby blue. I like it, I think it works for them. The brighter red is also huge, part of the reason I think the outgoing set looked so drab was that the "Battle Red" was fairly dark. Going with a brighter candy-paint-inspired red will help with that a lot. It's also interesting that the Lions apparently did not change their Honolulu blue shade, as it looked a bit brighter than previous versions, even in that one photo which offered a direct comparison.
  2. I do wonder if they could've pulled off using both royal and navy in more of a cobalance, instead of relegating royal to a barely visible accent, beyond the throwbacks. I'd at least appreciate the ambition more than what they rolled out with. I think it'd make sense for the snowcap of the mountain to remain white, if that's possible.
  3. This series seems very adventurous so far, I appreciate your creativity & willingness to try new ideas, as that's something I often struggle with. Just some comments on each of the teams so far: Arizona: I love the "Copper State" alternate, just as I did in your previous series. Atlanta: I also really dug the red & neon look for the Hawks, but I'm not sure how I feel about it for the Falcons. Maybe it could work as an accent to a helmet stripe (like they used to have a bit of gold in their stripe), but as the main color of the logo besides black it's a bit distracting. Baltimore: I actually don't hate the lavender-to-black-back-to lavender gradient of the alternate, it makes sense with the shimmering of a raven's feathers. I'd be curious to see how something like that would look in real life. Buffalo: The Bills traditional-style set works really well for them, but if they ever decided to go the more "modern" route, this would be about perfect. The "Blizzard Bills" alternate is really fun. Looking forward to seeing the rest!
  4. Guardians: I dig it! I've always had a tough time coming up with a good striping pattern to use for Cleveland, but this is a good one for them. The "The Land" uniform is really nice too. White Sox: Another hit! The transition of the City Connect-style into the primary set is a natural choice, and the change from three stripes to two is an upgrade. The alternate gray and "Southsiders" uniforms are incredibly sharp too. Can't wait to see what else you have in store!
  5. Honestly, given what was said in the lead-up to this unveiling, things came out surprisingly tame for the Texans. I think they’re about a lateral move from their previous set, more ambitious but less consistent. Still, they’re not as inconsistent as they were made out to be beforehand, it’s definitely not 4 completely different designs, but more like 2 separate designs split across 4 jerseys. Pros I really like the horn stripes, both on the jersey and helmet. It feels like a nice update of the USC design that’s now unique to them. The number font honestly looks pretty nice, judging by @DCarp1231’s picture, definitely better than it seemed in the original leak. A solid update of the old font. I like the red “candy paint” helmet, I just wish the facemask was navy so that the horn could flow into it easier. The “H-Town” set honestly isn’t bad at all, the helmet seemed goofy at first but works within the rest of the uniform, even though I’d still prefer the H-Town variant of the bull logo. I’d also like to see a bit more of the H-Town blue present in the actual uniform. I will say, this design balances the 3 colors way better than the Titans do. Cons I still hate perforated numbers, and the Texans joining the Rams on the “Fruit Roll-Up” numbers bandwagon. The home navy leaves a lot to be desired, I could honestly see a lot of people wondering what changed. The double-logo on the sleeves & helmet is a downgrade from the previous version. I don’t love the increased navy-heaviness of the away jersey, but it’s growing on me. Interestingly, for this uniform season I’d say we got a huge upgrade (Lions), a couple lateral moves where one is a slight upgrade (Jets) & the other is a slight downgrade (Texans), and a huge downgrade (Broncos). One of every possibility across the spectrum.
  6. I'm surpised at the amount of people saying this new Broncos set is an upgrade over the outgoing one. Sure, the previous uniforms probably stuck around a few years or so past their welcome, but I simply cannot envision this new design having nearly the same amount of staying power. I was a bigger fan than most of the "narrative uniform" trend, where each design element has a unique reasoning and explanation behind it ("Nike-speak," in not as many words), but that trend feels very much of the 2010's. Most other teams nowadays are ditching those identities for something more traditionally-based, with maybe the slightest of modern twists. While the '97 set was ahead of its time, this set feels like it's about 10 years too late. I didn't necessarily love the '97 set or anything, I was about ready for it to go, but pretty much everything in these new uniforms is a downgrade for me. I loved the outgoing number font, it was distinctly Broncos yet clearly readable, that could've stayed their font forever. The new helmet stripe and the sleeve design are both very strange; the helmet gives very clear Seahawks vibes, while I can't help but see the Chargers logo on the sleeves. The fading triangles in the numbers had a surprisingly fitting explanation, but I still don't like perforations. The pant stripe sort of jives with the sleeve, but not entirely. The combinations all matching the pants with the socks don't make me feel much better about the whole thing either. I'm not usually ever a "they should just revert to the throwbacks & call it a day" kind of a person, but this is one situation where they really could have gone back to the Orange Crush (although I would have preferred the 60's look), updated a few things, and it would've been a really solid redesign. This reminds me of the Rams' rebrand where the solution was truly so simple & they just tried to do too much.
  7. For what it is, I honestly really like the Mets' City Connect. A bit more purple would certainly be nice, but the shade they're using really pops where it is used. I'm really surprised they didn't go with matching pants, but given the general disapproval many have had of dark pants, I suppose it makes sense. I'm also surprised they didn't mention the 1910's New York Giants as inspiration, as they shared a similar color scheme. For that reason, I think this set really works as a nice "sub-brand" for the Mets.
  8. New York Mets City Connect Off of first impression, I honestly think this City jersey works really well for the Mets, so I didn't really make any changes.
  9. I haven't gotten to look through the thread yet, but as I imagine others are saying, I really like the Lions new uniforms. I didn't think they really needed a redesign, as I thought their previous uniforms were really solid, even near-perfect. However, every change they made with this new set, besides the block numbers (I'm gonna be partial to custom fonts 9 times out of 10), looks to be an upgrade, surprisingly. To expand on my thoughts: Pros: I really dig the new striping pattern. It's a nice combination of the Northwestern stripe and the Mustang dual-stripe. My one minor gripe is that I wish the border blue stripes were a bit thicker, ideally the same width as the inner white stripe. The Honolulu facemask really pops, it looks great. I like that they're trying to lean more into silver as opposed to a flat gray. I'm normally not a fan of reflective materials on football jerseys, but it works really well here in the sleeve stripes & number trim. I wasn't really a fan of black for the Lions, one thing I really liked about the 2017 redesign was that they got rid of it. However, this new black alternate looks awesome. The blue helmet really pops with the black accents; as I'm sure others have said, this should've been a look that the Panthers have. Cons: I don't like the perforated numbers at all. This seems to be Nike's newest trend, with the Cardinals having it last year and it making its way across MLB. I normally like wordmarks on the chest, but I think the new Vapor F.U.S.E. template just forces them to be too low. The home looks nice without one, but the away looks a little awkward. As much as I don't like the removal of the stripes on the pants, I get why they did it for the blue pair at least, so they could wear it with the black jersey, without the stripes mismatching. However, I don't see why the white and black pants needed to go stripeless. Although I like the black jersey, it's a bit of a strange decision to go with a white Nike swoosh & nameplate, when silver or Honolulu blue would've worked just as well. Overall, this is a very pleasantly surprising update. I didn't think they could improve much on the previous set (before the Color Rush & white pants shenanigans), but they really managed to.
  10. I'm a bit late, since we seem to be moving on to the Lions, but as I believe I said when the Jets confirmed they were going back to the Sack Exchange jerseys, it's pretty much a lateral move for me, maybe a slight upgrade because the lack of black on the primary home & away. I'm surprised they updated the logo, it seemed like they were gonna go straight throwback with everything. I'm not yet sure how I feel about the new jet, it looks a bit more like a jet but it also makes it look "slower." I'm looking forward to seeing the Lions, but I'm not sure the teaser tells us much yet, though. I'll probably have more to say after the official reveal.
  11. The Phillies’ City Connect cap has a pattern underneath the brim, so it’s not unprecedented for an on-field City Connect hat to have it. If anything, all of the attention given to the inside of the hat adds credence to it being the official on-field hat, in my opinion.
  12. This is the slippery slope I feared when it came to the allowing for alternate helmets. Two helmets was pushing it, but it allowed for fun throwback designs like the Bucs and Seahawks. But a third helmet design feels unnecessary for pretty much every team. At this point, they might as well allow teams to have as many helmets as they want, like it's college (not that I would endorse that). I wouldn't say I'm a hardcore traditionalist by any stretch, but the one-helmet-rule was a nice limitation that kept brands intact for the limited 17-game season and elevated helmets to a central component of the brand. Now, I can't think of any team with two helmets that would benefit from a third one.
  13. I'm so glad to see you're going through with this! And I'm honored that I could be an inspiration for it, as your original baseball series is one of my favorites that I took a lot of inspiration from myself! Boston looks great, I especially love the "Fenway Heritage" uniform, I wish that was one I could've come up with myself. I'm looking forward to following the rest of the series!
  14. As expected, I don't really have much positive to say about Philly's City Connect. The cap is pretty nice I suppose. I'm still really excited for the rest of the reveals to come.
  15. I also just wanted to note that I updated the images throughout the thread, most of it was just updates to the backgrounds for improved contrast, with a few small tweaks here & there. You can see the most updated versions of all of my designs on my portfolio website.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.