Gothamite

NFL Changes 2015

Recommended Posts

Did you bother to read any of the posts above you?

Yes I did. He posted photos, I posted a video.

Some of you freaking people.

It's basically the same thing lol

And I gotta say, the Bengals joke was better than the Colts.

Honestly it would've been funny for the Redskins to pull a name change April fools joke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you bother to read any of the posts above you?

Yes I did. He posted photos, I posted a video.

Some of you freaking people.

It's basically the same thing lol

And I gotta say, the Bengals joke was better than the Colts.

Honestly it would've been funny for the Redskins to pull a name change April fools joke

Yes it would but I dont think they want to go there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bengals joke would've been perfect if they added "the black remains unchanged"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bengals with a decent April Fools'-related uniform prank, too (though it came way after noon).

http://www.bengals.com/news/article-1/Bengals-reveal-NEW-logo-for-2015/bee575b1-a6cb-48b1-a5b6-e65be3939058

Nice dig at the Browns.

The more important thing is we now know there IS in fact a number set included in the Bengals' custom font. (Check the years.)

I don't know about y'all but I'd love to see them on their uniforms in place of that DIN trash they have on there now.

You know, a lil something like this...

a75ef0c83b6ad7fee518abcfdf90e975.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bengals with a decent April Fools'-related uniform prank, too (though it came way after noon).

http://www.bengals.com/news/article-1/Bengals-reveal-NEW-logo-for-2015/bee575b1-a6cb-48b1-a5b6-e65be3939058

Nice dig at the Browns.

The more important thing is we now know there IS in fact a number set included in the Bengals' custom font. (Check the years.)

I don't know about y'all but I'd love to see them on their uniforms in place of that DIN trash they have on there now.

You know, a lil something like this...

a75ef0c83b6ad7fee518abcfdf90e975.png

Here's the full set from Mark Verlander's portfolio. There's a lot of interesting stuff that he's posted from his other NFL rebrands on there as well. http://www.verlanderdesign.com

verlander.nfl.bengals.15.jpg?format=750w

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bengals with a decent April Fools'-related uniform prank, too (though it came way after noon).

http://www.bengals.com/news/article-1/Bengals-reveal-NEW-logo-for-2015/bee575b1-a6cb-48b1-a5b6-e65be3939058

Nice dig at the Browns.

The more important thing is we now know there IS in fact a number set included in the Bengals' custom font. (Check the years.)

I don't know about y'all but I'd love to see them on their uniforms in place of that DIN trash they have on there now.

You know, a lil something like this...

a75ef0c83b6ad7fee518abcfdf90e975.png

Here's the full set from Mark Verlander's portfolio. There's a lot of interesting stuff that he's posted from his other NFL rebrands on there as well. http://www.verlanderdesign.com

verlander.nfl.bengals.15.jpg?format=750w

Yes , it looks like the Falcons also had a red set of pants at one point??

verlander.nfl.falcons.05.jpg?format=750w

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The pant patterns are completely different than the final version and that's a good thing because those are hideous. Also the number font is a basic block.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you bother to read any of the posts above you?

Yes I did. He posted photos, I posted a video.

Some of you freaking people.

It's basically the same thing lol

Not the same thing at all. Did you watch the video?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you bother to read any of the posts above you?

Yes I did. He posted photos, I posted a video.

Some of you freaking people.

It's basically the same thing lol
Not the same thing at all. Did you watch the video?
Yes, actually I did. They are the same thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, actually I did. They are the same thing.

They are in reference to the same thing (the white unis), but they are not the same thing. The photos are just that - static photos. In the video, # 33 talks about the unis and the concept behind them and offers that hilarious line "if they can't see the numbers, they can't scout us". Would you have gotten all that from looking the photos alone? No, you wouldn't have. Therefore, the video was a nice compliment to the photos, but not a redundancy by any means.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you bother to read any of the posts above you?

Yes I did. He posted photos, I posted a video.

Some of you freaking people.

It's basically the same thing lol
Not the same thing at all. Did you watch the video?
Yes, actually I did. They are the same thing.

They are in reference to the same thing (the white unis), but they are not the same thing. The photos are just that - static photos. In the video, # 33 talks about the unis and the concept behind them and offers that hilarious line "if they can't see the numbers, they can't scout us". Would you have gotten all that from looking the photos alone? No, you wouldn't have. Therefore, the video was a nice compliment to the photos, but not a redundancy by any means.

Video > Photos

you dont get the same kind of presentation in photos as you do in the video and it was nice to see they at least put some decent effort into the joke. It seems like you guys just fight and nitpick for the dumbest reasons.

Some may find the vid useful and others not but no reason to argue over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Video > Photos

you dont get the same kind of presentation in photos as you do in the video and it was nice to see they at least put some decent effort into the joke. It seems like you guys just fight and nitpick for the dumbest reasons.

Some may find the vid useful and others not but no reason to argue over.

I'm just defending the guy who posted the video link. Some folks jumped all over him, as if he had posted the same thing as the photos post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now