the admiral

NHL Anti-Thread: Bad Business Decision Aggregator

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Wings said:

 

 

I thought it was pronounced sa-skach-uh-won

 

sa-skatch-win

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes yes, stop-reel-line-mint, but I wanted to type this out, walk through it mentally and I'm bored:

 

Northwest: Seattle, Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton

Pacific: Anaheim, Los Angeles, San Jose, Vegas

Southwest: Arizona, Colorado, Dallas, Nashville

Central: Chicago, Minnesota, St. Louis, Winnipeg

 

Northeast: Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, Boston

Metropolitan: NY Rangers, NY Islanders, New Jersey, Philadelphia

Lake Erie: Detroit, Columbus, Pittsburgh, Buffalo

Southeast: Tampa Bay, Florida, Carolina, Washington

 

Western Conference is easy enough to sort out, but not without its own smaller issues. I'm sure Nashville would lobby to stay with Chicago, but that's not life or death. That led to playing with an all-Canadian Northwest where Winnipeg goes to the Northwest, Seattle goes to the Pacific, Vegas goes to the Southwest, Nashville goes to the Central. I did like that layout for geography, but then you're splitting Seattle and Vancouver which seemed silly, as that's been a small selling point. But again, all easy enough.

 

The Eastern Conference gets trickier. This is the way that probably works best, but you get stuck with a sort of wonky "Lake Erie" Division. Geographically and culturally it makes sense, but you still have Washington split from Pittsburgh, Philadelphia split from Pittsburgh, Detroit split from Toronto. There's no way to get all those rivalries to work in the 8x4 model without getting some seriously screwy geography (not unlike what we're currently dealing with in the present Atlantic Division). But I think this works, you get Ohio-Michigan, you get Columbus-Pittsburgh, you get the Pens/Wings back to back Cups, you get... Buffalo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your Northwest+Pacific and Southwest+Central are probably going to be the way the divisions shake out if we keep four, with Arizona getting kicked to the Central and precious little regard for MUH TIME ZONES there. Your Northeast and Lake Erie could go together as one division, too, if we're gonna tell Pittsburgh they can't play with their friends anymore like we did for a few years in the '90s when they got kicked out to make room for the Panthers. However, look how easily you could flip them with Quebec City.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would love to see Detroit back to the West. But I know geographically that won’t happen. And I’m on the “Ky-OATZ” bandwagon. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d really love to see the NHL commit to a 4 division, no conferences alignment. Put Seattle in the Pacific, move Arizona to the Central. And then have the top four teams in each division make the playoffs and face off against their division for the first two rounds. Then when you get to the final four division winners, re-seed based on regular season record.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SqfZaQJ.jpg

 

Oilers off to an encouraging start with a big victory against dividing by zero

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/4/2018 at 11:53 AM, Gary. said:

I would love to see Detroit back to the West. But I know geographically that won’t happen. And I’m on the “Ky-OATZ” bandwagon. 

If I had my way Detroit and Toronto would still be in the West. I know, "muh timezones", but I think they both had better rivalries over there anyways: Detroit had San Jose & especially Colorado, Toronto had St. Louis & arguably Los Angeles and they both had Chicago and obviously each other; and I think splitting the "Original Six" 3 per conference was a better setup than dumping 5 in the same conference anyways, and leaving Chicago on their own to feud with St. Louis and... Nashville, I guess?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh man, I remember that Greatest Uniforms poll the NHL did for their centennial last year, I think I'll go see the results again- 

YfKHwNp.png

...oh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/6/2018 at 2:33 PM, mcj882000 said:

If I had my way Detroit and Toronto would still be in the West. I know, "muh timezones", but I think they both had better rivalries over there anyways: Detroit had San Jose & especially Colorado, Toronto had St. Louis & arguably Los Angeles and they both had Chicago and obviously each other; and I think splitting the "Original Six" 3 per conference was a better setup than dumping 5 in the same conference anyways, and leaving Chicago on their own to feud with St. Louis and... Nashville, I guess?

Chicago, Detroit, Minnesota, St. Louis, and Toronto would be my dream division. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Ice_Cap said:

Chicago, Detroit, Minnesota, St. Louis, and Toronto would be my dream division. 

+ Winnipeg, which is more at home with Chicago and the Twin Cities than points west.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy Cohen is running arena dates?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a post in the NHL season changes thread about the Met Center seats and it led me down a '91 North Stars rabbit hole. Behold!

 

https://nathangabay.com/how-bobby-clarke-almost-drafted-himself-the-1991-expansion-draft/

 

Quote

 


Just when we seemed to run out of insulting material about the National Hockey League, it decided to hold an expansion draft.

High jinks ensued. The NHL computer spewed out a list of unprotected players that read like a Legends of Hockey team – Jean Beliveau, Yvan Cournoyer, John Ferguson, Bobby Clarke, Ken Dryden, Bob Gainey, Bernie Federko, Brian Sutter . . .

What happened?

The NHL’s New York office called it a computer glitch, but the Montreal office said those players who never filed their retirement papers were actually eligible for the draft, even though many now are grandfathers.

Whatever the case, the list, circulated nationally by the wire services, gave hockey fans another hearty laugh at league expense.

This goofy development was simply more harmless fun provided by a league run by clowns.

Gordon, Jeff. “NHL Discovers Another Way To Get Laughs.” St. Louis Post-Dispatch: 30 May 1991. 1D. Print.

 

 

The NHL's Apple IIe crashed and put Jean Beliveau in the expansion draft, and so the St. Louis Post-Dispatch was doing an OITGDNHL thread in 1991. Time, like a hockey puck, really is a flat circle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DpHaQrcW0AENj4J?format=jpg&name=large

 

Regular Season Western Conference Champion Nashville Predators.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Gordon, Jeff. “NHL Discovers Another Way To Get Laughs.” St. Louis Post-Dispatch: 30 May 1991. 1D. Print.


huh, I didn't realise Jeff Gordon had a career in hockey journalism before getting into stock car racing :V

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Still MIGHTY said:
DpHaQrcW0AENj4J?format=jpg&name=large

 

Regular Season Western Conference Champion Nashville Predators.

That’s “AFC Finalist” level. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/9/2018 at 11:18 PM, Still MIGHTY said:
DpHaQrcW0AENj4J?format=jpg&name=large

 

Regular Season Western Conference Champion Nashville Predators.

 

You can even purchase your own Regular Season Western Conference Champions banner from the team store.

 

DpGWB-sX4AEmKSr.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/4/2018 at 1:32 AM, Wings said:

 

 

I thought it was pronounced sa-skach-uh-won

NSFW

the joke is 12 seconds in (the rest is still funny)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An arbitrator knocked Austin Watson's suspension down from 27 to 18, which puts left-leaning people in sort of a double-bind: domestic violence should be punished, but the league shouldn't have unilateral power to punish players if the collective bargaining agreement allows for the PA to appeal. 18 still seems too low (no hockey player would ever say that), but the union has to do union things or else what's the point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now