hockey week Posted December 2, 2015 Author Share Posted December 2, 2015 I would have gone the whole Aztec Jaguar Warrior route, as it would be more colourful and tie in to the regions history well, but Caudillos could work as well. I wouldn't use the Raider's logo as a base. The eye patch doesn't really fit this new theme. Use a different face for a more Mexican feel. These are revolutionary soldiers, not pirates, make that clear. You're right, I was lazy. It was easy to explain as "it helps connect it to the parent team", but they're plenty connected as-is. And claiming to not be a logo designer doesn't excuse the lack of creativity there. So I've made adjustments. Originally I just removed the eyepatch and tried for a slightly angrier look, but it also looked lazy.So I added a Mexican hero, someone who I originally avoided because of potential to offend, but I figured there's plausible deniability if a league did something like this...it's a caricature at best, after all. So the new face of the Mexico City Caudillos is Poncho Villa, but officially it's simply "more authentic to the people of Mexico City and the actual Caudillos throughout their proud history" I'll respect any opinion that you can defend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silence of the Rams Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Hey trial and error man. Believe me I get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrescentCitySon Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 The new logo looks better. You should change the white tigers logo, it looks to much like Cleveland's logo. What about a black and white version of the bengals' alt logo, the tiger head? That would look better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silence of the Rams Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 The new logo looks better. You should change the white tigers logo, it looks to much like Cleveland's logo. What about a black and white version of the bengals' alt logo, the tiger head? That would look better.Cleveland? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinny39 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Im not really a fan of the sponsors on the jerseys. They just clutter it up IMO. Maybe put them on the back under the number? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockey week Posted December 2, 2015 Author Share Posted December 2, 2015 Im not really a fan of the sponsors on the jerseys. They just clutter it up IMO. Maybe put them on the back under the number?I truly hate jersey sponsors. I'm ideologically opposed, entirely. But, the AHL can't get away without one on the shoulder, the NFL's practice jerseys have them on the chest, and I can't imagine that the NFL would avoid the great financial opportunity of single ads on jerseys. If anything, I would think that there would be large full-chest ads under the numbers on both sides, perhaps replacing the nameplate and bumping the names to underneath the numbers.Putting the ads there, where they're photographed every time you get their faces, which is the entire point. The ad patch, along with the patch for the parent team (don't think for a moment that the NFL teams would allow themselves to be forgotten), make it more difficult to brand each team, which helps the challenge. I think it's a necessary evil, unfortunately. Definitely there for realism.And, I'm at a complete loss for Raleigh (Carolina's affiliate), Birmingham (Atlanta's affiliate...really trying to avoid USFL names, and if anybody should have a horse-related name, it should be Denver's affiliate), and Louisville (Indianapolis' affiliate). Any suggestions? I'll respect any opinion that you can defend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eick74 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 I have no idea about Raleigh, but living near Birmingham, there are a couple options. It's nicknames are the Magic City (regarding how quickly the city grew) and the Pittsburgh of the South (steel industry). I would consider Hammers as the team nickname. References both the steel industry and the state bird (Yellowhammer) which would give a bird image to match the Falcons logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
athleticsfan2k8 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 For Louisville have the Stallions name or the thoroughbreds despite of the Kentucky Derby held on the first Saturday of May. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EJaws Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 I idea for Carolina affiliate, move the team to Charlotte and have them be the Charlotte Racer (all of the big racing headquarters are in Charlotte), just and idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan O'Mac Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 I idea for Carolina affiliate, move the team to Charlotte and have them be the Charlotte Racer (all of the big racing headquarters are in Charlotte), just and ideaBut isn't the Carolina NFL team in Charlotte? I like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EJaws Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 I idea for Carolina affiliate, move the team to Charlotte and have them be the Charlotte Racer (all of the big racing headquarters are in Charlotte), just and ideaBut isn't the Carolina NFL team in Charlotte?Oops yeah I :censored:ed up there didnt I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuordr Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Lose the gray facemasks on most of these teams as they look like crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockey week Posted December 2, 2015 Author Share Posted December 2, 2015 This is a no-brainer. The only questions were "where?" and "what affiliation?" and I think it became obvious over time.Austin Oilers - Affiliate of the Houston TexansAustin is a young, exciting city with plenty of Millenials and hipsters who are clamoring to yell "Love ya Blue!" for real. The proximity of Austin to Houston makes it a logical extension of the fandom, and affiliating the Oilers with Houston, rather than Tennessee, keeps both the fandom and the money within the state of Texas. This is nostalgia pandering, but I don't think anybody will have issues with it. They'll just be happy to see the team on the field again. I'd expect these jerseys to be quite popular in Houston as well.Any attempt to change the logo only made it worse, there's no improving it. Pushing the secondary logo, based on the seal of the city of Austin (with Texans logo elements mixed in), and the secondary logo. Pushing the location and ensuring that it's not Houston (or Nashville) with the team will be the biggest marketing challenge. The design mixes the 90s uniforms with the much much older font, covering all bases. The team in sponsored by Dell.Primary logo:Secondary logo:Wordmark:Home jersey:Road jersey: I'll respect any opinion that you can defend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan O'Mac Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Two things I don't like about the Oilers:1) The oil derrick on the helmet is too small2) I don't like the Nike logo on top of the stripes on the sleevesEDIT: Added bolded word I like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrescentCitySon Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 The new logo looks better. You should change the white tigers logo, it looks to much like Cleveland's logo. What about a black and white version of the bengals' alt logo, the tiger head? That would look better.Cleveland?Sorry, I'm thinking about the Monday game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrescentCitySon Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 You really shouldn't put the parent franchise's logo on the uniforms. Also, the secondary logo's little background has nothing to do with the Oiler's main logo. Otherwise it's good. Also, change Mexico City's team to the Mexico City Aztecs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silence of the Rams Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 You really shouldn't put the parent franchise's logo on the uniforms. Also, the secondary logo's little background has nothing to do with the Oiler's main logo. Otherwise it's good. Also, change Mexico City's team to the Mexico City Aztecs.Don't the NBADL, AHL, and MiLB do it too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuckleball Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Mexico looks better already! And bringing back the Oilers is a great idea, but I'm not crazy about the number font. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrescentCitySon Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 That's not a very good Poncho Villa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MontyK17 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 The White Tigers one is the best! As a Ravens fan I like the Norfolk one, especially the teal colour. Keep up the good work!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.