OnWis97

Los Angeles NFL Brands Discussion

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Ice_Cap said:

That name's stupid too. For the same reason.

 

It's a stupid name for the same reason Bay State Patriots would have been a stupid name . . . even though the Patriots were (and are) the only team in Massachusetts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Angeles Golden Chargers

 

Anaheim Rams of San Diego

 

Vegas Raiders of San Antonio

 

HARTFORD WHALER-PATRIOTS OF BOSTON AND PROVIDENCE 

 

Oh god I think i'm gonna make myself barf

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, leopard88 said:

How about Angeles Chargers?!?!

 

 

 

*ducks*

 

In my mind, I thought about "Angeles Golden Chargers"...a name so ridiculous it will likely be in the NHL (somehow) by 2035.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, CreamSoda said:

So Cal Chargers

 

Nah they made it clear in their announcement that they're done with San Diego. They threw 56 years of history out the window in their rush to LA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, bosrs1 said:

 

Nah they made it clear in their announcement that they're done with San Diego. They threw 56 years of history out the window in their rush to LA.

Yes, if they had any interest in keeping a fan base in San Diego they wouldn't have scorched the earth as they've done today. They would have picked a name like So Cal Chargers and said they really wanted to stay in San Diego for the fans but that they simply needed a better stadium and that they hope the fans will continue to support them in their new stadium. Instead they severed all ties with San Diego. Blew the whole thing up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

San Diego Chargers of Los Angeles, or SDCOLA.  They can even bottle SDColas for sale at the stadium.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ice_Cap said:

That name's stupid too. For the same reason.

Same goes for Florida Panthers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, daniel75 said:

Same goes for Florida Panthers?

 

I think thats an exception since the actual name of the species is the Florida panther, kind of like the Texas Rangers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TornadoGTS said:

 

I think thats an exception since the actual name of the species is the Florida panther, kind of like the Texas Rangers

I hear you but the argument sounds nit picky, i actually prefer California Chargers. Just because there are other NFL teams in California........ so what.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/24/2016 at 11:13 PM, the admiral said:

The Chargers brand is not irreparably damaged because they lost a game to Cleveland, you drama queens.

UPDATE: It's irreparably damaged because they moved to a 27,000-seat soccer stadium on some idle Wednesday night after scores of indications that the league and San Diego were trying to make something work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Lee Noire said:

Ahh yes. #FightForLA

 

Sounds like a PWG BOLA lead in show.

Nice lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, daniel75 said:

I hear you but the argument sounds nit picky, i actually prefer California Chargers. Just because there are other NFL teams in California........ so what.

They don't and can't represent the entire state. Not even the only team in the market. Bay Area is Raiders/Niners territory, San Diego hates them forever. Maybe Sacramento will jump on.. Lol nvm they suffer enough with the Kings. My point is: You can't try to claim an entire state when there's 2/3 other teams, you're not even the only team in the city and and PART OF CALIFORNIA HATES YOUR GUTS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, FlyEaglesFly76 said:

They don't and can't represent the entire state. Not even the only team in the market. Bay Area is Raiders/Niners territory, San Diego hates them forever. Maybe Sacramento will jump on.. Lol nvm they suffer enough with the Kings. My point is: You can't try to claim an entire state when there's 2/3 other teams, you're not even the only team in the city and and PART OF CALIFORNIA HATES YOUR GUTS

I don't see it as claiming an entire state. Having California in the team name doesn't mean "we're the only team in the state", thats a stretch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, daniel75 said:

I don't see it as claiming an entire state.

Me either. It's just saying you play there. I mean at least it's more technically correct than those teams that have a name of a city where they don't even play. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the ONLY rebrand that'd make it so I'm cool with this move. 

Spoiler

The Los Angeles Express. Make it :censored:ing happen, idiot Dean. 

Helmet-LA-Express.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, daniel75 said:

Same goes for Florida Panthers?

Nope. The Florida Panthers get a pass because the Florida panther is an actual species of big cat. The entire name has meaning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Ice_Cap said:

Nope. The Florida Panthers get a pass because the Florida panther is an actual species of big cat. The entire name has meaning.

So if they changed from the Chargers to the Condors you'd be ok with the California Condors?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now