projectjohn Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 17 minutes ago, upperV03 said: Huh, I'd say this new wishbone collar is actually considerably better than this: Granted, it's still not a good look per se, but at least it doesn't have that damn horizontal line connecting to the colored piping of the wishbone shape. I guess I'm in the extreme minority, but I liked it a lot better how it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamdaviinci Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 8 minutes ago, projectjohn said: I guess I'm in the extreme minority, but I liked it a lot better how it was. I'm in the middle -- I think Adidas' continuity of material is better than Nike's raised material, but I think Nike's elimination of the horizontal blue line/seam is better than Adidas' inclusion of it. Between the Warriors' jersey and now these, Nike's wishbone collars are already really starting to bother me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Holmes Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 23 minutes ago, projectjohn said: I guess I'm in the extreme minority, but I liked it a lot better how it was. I am in the minority, too, I guess. I love that line. If Nike cannot replicate it though, I don't understand persisting with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Holmes Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 21 hours ago, CitizenTino said: Cavs wine jersey? Edit: Here is the source I... like it? What they have now is better but I am glad to see them incorporate some blue into the wine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 1 hour ago, projectjohn said: I figured it'd stay looking the same since Nike was the one that initially pioneered it back in the early 2000s. Isn't it ironic, don't you think? Fyi it was 1999, and unless the Lakers go back to the Showtime era neck holes what with Magic and Lonzo's bromance and all, we'll likely see this for the Lakers, Heat and Mavs, as well. I guess it could've been worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LakeShow24 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 1 hour ago, BJ Sands said: Missed opportunity to have Ford as a Jersey sponsor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(probably)notabandwagonfan Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 2 hours ago, BJ Sands said: These look like the counterfeit jerseys I saw on the streets when I was living in the Philippines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceBurgs70 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 2 hours ago, BJ Sands said: The collar makes it look like the jerseys were turned inside out and then they stitched on the numbers and lettering on the wrong side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 18 hours ago, honeybadger said: The Cavs uni would have looked good if it came out in something like 2010, now it already looks dated. I disagree, because this this style of uniform has never looked good. There were much better uniforms before the piping era and after the piping era (including the uniforms the Cavaliers just had). This uniform just makes you want one of those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 Unfortunately, arm piping that only goes halfway around is the new standard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_Raptors_king Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 im assuming all NIKE jerseys will be unveiled at the Rookie Photo shoot in early August Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delux247 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 3 hours ago, BJ Sands said: Another local sponsor. Now 8/10 announced sponsors are local (Fitbit for the Wolves and Stubhub for the Sixers are not local). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suns1977 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 So far these ads aren't completely destroying the look like I thought they would. (From @darrenrovell on Twitter.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satomiblood Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 22 minutes ago, suns1977 said: So far these ads aren't completely destroying the look like I thought they would. (From @darrenrovell on Twitter.) Some are more seamless than others. I think Sacramento/Blue Diamond, Boston/GE, Cleveland/Goodyear, and Utah/5FTF look the best. infor at least looks better in Brooklyn B&W than its native company colors, but the boxier the sponsor patches are, the more out of place they look. That's kind of why I'm not really big on the Disney, StubHub, Flagstar, and infor patches. They just don't blend in with their respective jerseys as well as the others. For Orlando, I think the Disney mouse ears logo would've made for a better patch. It's still iconic enough that people will recognize who the sponsor is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suns1977 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 7 minutes ago, Satomiblood said: Some are more seamless than others. I think Sacramento/Blue Diamond, Boston/GE, Cleveland/Goodyear, and Utah/5FTF look the best. infor at least looks better in Brooklyn B&W than its native company colors, but the boxier the sponsor patches are, the more out of place they look. That's kind of why I'm not really big on the Disney, StubHub, Flagstar, and infor patches. They just don't blend in with their respective jerseys as well as the others. Agreed. I think Utah's and Sac's are the best fit (style & color). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnWis97 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 They all piss me off. Utah's the least bad because it reminds me of that "goals for kids" patch in Winnipeg. The worst are contrasting colors in a rectangle (Detroit, Brooklyn, Philly) Disclaimer: If this comment is about an NBA uniform from 2017-2018 or later, do not constitute a lack of acknowledgement of the corporate logo to mean anything other than "the corporate logo is terrible and makes the uniform significantly worse." BADGERS TWINS VIKINGS TIMBERWOLVES WILD POTD (Shared) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrad. Posted July 26, 2017 Author Share Posted July 26, 2017 Red Goat Creations :: Graphic Design Solutions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satomiblood Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 DP would've looked better on the waistband with the Pistons logo on the shorts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BucksFan5 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 Those are really clean. I have nearly no complaints about the unis released this far. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Survival79 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 We are wolves • Under the moon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.