Conrad.

NBA Changes 2017-18

Recommended Posts

image.png.5afa9d0a913ff56d176329c9484815be.png

 

It'll be the same on the red jersey and on the white jersey its a red swoosh and ad will be black. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BlackBolt3 said:

This is probably the weakest advertisement patch I've ever seen.

 

I agree, I'll take boring over something really weird that sticks out like a sore thumb. This is forgettable, and thats fine with me lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, BlackBolt3 said:

This is probably the weakest advertisement patch I've ever seen.

I mean isn't that what we would want? Same color as the jersey so that it blends in and "kinda" disappears. In a world where ads will be around that's the best case scenario right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes, this is best case scenario. Weakest wasn't the best word choice, but the combination of the thin font and off-white patch itself reeks of sadness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For those of you who wanted to see the Lakers reject the patch nonsense, Wish rejected.

 

Darren Rovell has the pics:

 

 

That means 16 teams have a patch thus far

Edited by buzzcut

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, buzzcut said:

For those of you who wanted to see the Lakers reject the patch nonsense, Wish rejected.

 

Sorry, no pics. That means 16 teams have a patch for this season.

 

Nothing is sacred when it comes to the almighty dollar. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, buzzcut said:

For those of you who wanted to see the Lakers reject the patch nonsense, Wish rejected.

 

Sorry, no pics. That means 16 teams have a patch for this season so far.

FIFY. Even if there aren't any more teams that add a patch before the season starts, they can add one at any point during the season if they're able to strike a deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More shots of the patch on the Lakers' jerseys:

IMG_7368.thumb.JPG.1378bf215798863931b3b9f006cafa97.JPGIMG_7367.thumb.JPG.ea4b65df4df487445227cd83c0ebfb74.JPGIMG_7369.thumb.JPG.8a075cd8c15b93f27b813f24769f999e.JPG

Obviously I'd rather the Lakers not have an ad patch, but this isn't awful. Having the logo match the color of the Nike swoosh on all three jerseys at least satisfies my OCD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the Lakers are one of the worst...though that's probably influenced by how iconic their uniforms/franchise are.  Kinda like how the Yankees will be the most jarring of all the UA logos.

 

Having seen most of these sponsor patches, they look about how I figured they'd look (as opposed to "even worse" or "not as bad").  And that is: cheap.  It's a huge step in the direction of "minor league."  In no way do I think this even approaches "tasteful."  There may be degrees of tastelessness and these may be a smaller degree than, say, European leagues, but it's tasteless, nonetheless.

 

Two sad facts about this:

  • We are the biggest uniform nerds in the world and are probably split 50/50 on whether this is a big deal or not (so I'd bet that at most 5% the general fan population will feel that way)
  • I, a casual NBA fan, will probably change nothing about my NBA consumption.  The Timberwolves are as promising as they've been in a while and I don't see myself boycotting and I could live without the NBA more than many.

So this tells me 1) that these adds are here to stay, 2) that they'll slowly get bigger, and 3) the other sports will be doing it.  So unless there is some surprise angle I'm not seeing (like a legitimate decline in jersey sales or something out of my element related to the sharing of visibility between the team and the sponsor), it's the beginning of the end.  I tend to doubt jersey sales will be impacted (particularly in basketball, but in all sports as well).  Either fans will buy them as is or the leagues will produce them sans ads.  While I would not 1) buy one with ads or 2) buy one that does not look the same (thereby forcing me to buy none) I doubt very many fans are that rigid.

 

My guess is that the other leagues love that the NBA is doing it.  They get to wait and see whether there are any negatives.  Once it turns out there are not, they should each be on board within a few years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awful, i would never buy a MLB, NHL, NBA jersey with an ad on it.

Its ruining everything. And there is no reason for a designer to sit and sweat over every little detail anymore, because an ad will mess up the cohesive appearance of the jersey 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been playing NBA Live for past week and honestly barely even notice the ads. Yes they suck but really not as bad as I originally thought. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, OnWis97 said:

I think the Lakers are one of the worst...though that's probably influenced by how iconic their uniforms/franchise are.  Kinda like how the Yankees will be the most jarring of all the UA logos.

 

Having seen most of these sponsor patches, they look about how I figured they'd look (as opposed to "even worse" or "not as bad").  And that is: cheap.  It's a huge step in the direction of "minor league."  In no way do I think this even approaches "tasteful."  There may be degrees of tastelessness and these may be a smaller degree than, say, European leagues, but it's tasteless, nonetheless.

 

Two sad facts about this:

  • We are the biggest uniform nerds in the world and are probably split 50/50 on whether this is a big deal or not (so I'd bet that at most 5% the general fan population will feel that way)
  • I, a casual NBA fan, will probably change nothing about my NBA consumption.  The Timberwolves are as promising as they've been in a while and I don't see myself boycotting and I could live without the NBA more than many.

So this tells me 1) that these adds are here to stay, 2) that they'll slowly get bigger, and 3) the other sports will be doing it.  So unless there is some surprise angle I'm not seeing (like a legitimate decline in jersey sales or something out of my element related to the sharing of visibility between the team and the sponsor), it's the beginning of the end.  I tend to doubt jersey sales will be impacted (particularly in basketball, but in all sports as well).  Either fans will buy them as is or the leagues will produce them sans ads.  While I would not 1) buy one with ads or 2) buy one that does not look the same (thereby forcing me to buy none) I doubt very many fans are that rigid.

 

My guess is that the other leagues love that the NBA is doing it.  They get to wait and see whether there are any negatives.  Once it turns out there are not, they should each be on board within a few years.

i feel the same

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, bowld said:

Been playing NBA Live for past week and honestly barely even notice the ads. Yes they suck but really not as bad as I originally thought. 

 

Ugh, NO.  Stop it.  

 

This is what the NBA wants.  

 

europe_original_crop_340x234.jpg?1333056

 

"I barely notice the Rytas patch since it matches the white piping!" 


WE ARE GOING DOWN THIS ROAD

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn, I was really hoping the Lakers would be one of the few teams to not partake in the ad patches seeing as their uniforms are basically classic, basketball royalty (along with the Celts, Spurs, Bulls among others). As far as patches go (because all advertisements on uniforms suck), it isn't bad. It's at least a small, relatively non obtrusive word that's color coordinated with the uniforms. 

 

I will never buy a jersey with one of these patches and if for some reason I ever renege on that, I would cut off the patch. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Lee Noire said:

I mean isn't that what we would want? Same color as the jersey so that it blends in and "kinda" disappears. In a world where ads will be around that's the best case scenario right?

 

I feel like best case scenario is when a sponsor looks like it could be a team jersey patch on first glance. Something that blends and doesn't stop you in your tracks like Utah, or relatively unobtrusive like Cleveland, Orlando and Philly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CS85 said:

europe_original_crop_340x234.jpg?1333056

 

"I barely notice the Rytas patch since it matches the white piping!"

 

Wrong example, because name of that team is Lietuvos Rytas ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an ugly stain on the jersey that should've never been there in the first place. These next few years are gonna be terrible for NBA jerseys that have taken a hit since Adidas brought in the Rev 30. The sooner their gone and the sooner they put the Jerry West logo back in it's rightful place, the better! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, insert name said:

It's an ugly stain on the jersey that should've never been there in the first place. These next few years are gonna be terrible for NBA jerseys that have taken a hit since Adidas brought in the Rev 30. The sooner their gone and the sooner they put the Jerry West logo back in it's rightful place, the better! 

Sorry, they're never going away. I agree with you that Adidas' Rev 30 material was terrible - close ups made it look like something that would be bulk ordered from an Eastbay catalog by a high school athletic department. The NBA logo also looks gross at the top back of the jersey. But money talks and the ads are here to stay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now