Esco

Los Angeles Chargers Brand Discussion

931 posts in this topic

4 minutes ago, tajmccall said:

 

ChargersIconEg.jpg

 

That split difference one looks best, hands down, IMO.

7 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So since the NFL agreed to 30000 seat venue the vegas raiders won't have any issue with Sam Boyd 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LA Chargers would look good in powder blue and gold, tbh.

 

37967_web.sp.10.19.watson.xtrapoints.col

 

Unique color scheme, and sets them further apart from the Rams. Imagine those uniforms with white helmets and pants. (dance)

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, BeerGuyJordan said:

 

That split difference one looks best, hands down, IMO.

 

At that size, I agree completely.  But I do think that at extremely small size (like, say a Twitter profile pic), the bolt becomes too thin and centering the letters is the right call.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ScubaSteve said:

How the hell does Jacksonville still have a team??

They won't let the team move to London yet.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, TheFallenHaveRisen said:

 

That is amazing. Good work, Lightning! 

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, bowld said:

Looks Amazing! Make it happen LAC

Spanos abhors powder blue so it won't happen. he only brings back the throwbacks and alts to keep the fans off his back about making them a full time look. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the Chargers will be more successful than the Rams in LA as far as on-field product. The Rams have not gotten any better under Kroenke and have not made the playoffs since 2004. The Chargers are often more competitive as they were a few plays away from the AFC championship game a few seasons back. The Rams haven't been 500 since Kroenke bought the team and gave away way too much for Goff who is in no way a sure thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Gothamite said:

 

At that size, I agree completely.  But I do think that at extremely small size (like, say a Twitter profile pic), the bolt becomes too thin and centering the letters is the right call.

You may be right.  

 

Just something that bugged me looking at it magnified. 

 

See folks. Packer and Vikings fans can have civil conversations!

 

(as long as booze isn't involved.)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having an interesting conversation on Twitter about this with Matthew Wolff, who designed LAFC's logo (among others).

 

 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Gothamite said:

Having an interesting conversation on Twitter about this with Matthew Wolff, who designed LAFC's logo (among others).

 

 

People are always unnecessarily harsh on anything new, but it really is a nice looking mark.

 

The Twitter replies are awful, but im sure many are upset (and justifiably so) SD fans.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, LMU said:

 

Isn't this a working logo, too? Why change it at all??

chargers.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, jgiff17 said:

So since the NFL agreed to 30000 seat venue the vegas raiders won't have any issue with Sam Boyd 

I don't see any issue with smaller venues being used on a short term basis as long as there's a plan in place for something permanent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, CLEstones said:

Haven't really been paying attention, but was it not discussed leaving the name and colors with St. Louis and San Diego?

 

They were the LA Rams for a lot longer than they were the St. Louis Rams.  Why would they leave the identity there?

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Echo said:

 

They were the LA Rams for a lot longer than they were the St. Louis Rams.  Why would they leave the identity there?

 

Yeah, that wouldn't have made any sense.  

 

There's an argument to be made that San Diego may own "Chargers", but St. Louis was only ever renting the Rams.

 

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Echo said:

 

They were the LA Rams for a lot longer than they were the St. Louis Rams.  Why would they leave the identity there?

 

Chargers made sense to leave behind though. Yes they started in LA and spent a grand total of 6 months there. But they were in San Diego for 56 years.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, jmac11281 said:

Isn't this a working logo, too? Why change it at all??

chargers.gif

Truth. Change the colors a little bit if you're for new uni's, but otherwise stick with this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now