jtthirtyfour Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 more ucla photos here: https://www.bruinsnation.com/ucla_bruin_football/2017/7/17/15979588/ucla-football-season-ticket-holders-get-a-look-at-the-under-armour-uniforms-at-bruin-viewin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont care Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 Ew, those striped ont look good on the actual game jerseys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandMooreArt Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 they never look good on mannequins, but honestly, its not too different from what Nike did with LSU. GRAPHIC ARTIST BEHANCE / MEDIUM / DRIBBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BJ Sands Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 1 hour ago, JPDesign said: First look at Oklahoma in the Vapor Untouchable template: The pants and belt are quite the departure... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upperV03 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 33 minutes ago, jtthirtyfour said: more ucla photos here: https://www.bruinsnation.com/ucla_bruin_football/2017/7/17/15979588/ucla-football-season-ticket-holders-get-a-look-at-the-under-armour-uniforms-at-bruin-viewin Man, I really hope they return to wearing this combo, even if it's only for one or two road games a season. It just looks right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 From the looks of that template, the stripes could easily loop around under the arms. Very disappointing for Under Armour not to do it that way. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont care Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 29 minutes ago, BrandMooreArt said: they never look good on mannequins, but honestly, its not too different from what Nike did with LSU. Yea but when compared to the released photos on the players earlier, the jerseys looked uncharacteristically loose. This makes me think that that was just the retail version and this on the mannequin is more true to what they will look like with truncated stripes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont care Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 This looks cheap like the screen printed numbers on the old reebok jerseys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8BW14 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 1 hour ago, jtthirtyfour said: more ucla photos here: https://www.bruinsnation.com/ucla_bruin_football/2017/7/17/15979588/ucla-football-season-ticket-holders-get-a-look-at-the-under-armour-uniforms-at-bruin-viewin The more I see these new UCLA uniforms, the less I like the helmet script in light blue. Everything tells me it should be better this way, but I don't think it contrasts the gold helmet enough like the navy blue lettering does. Disregarding the hideous jersey template and vomit inducing attempt at stripes, I think they should have kept this helmet, even if the blues still don't match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 10 minutes ago, 8BW14 said: The more I see these new UCLA uniforms, the less I like the helmet script in light blue. Everything tells me it should be better this way, but I don't think it contrasts the gold helmet enough like the navy blue lettering does. Disregarding the hideous jersey template and vomit inducing attempt at stripes, I think they should have kept this helmet, even if the blues still don't match. I agree. Although this update is an overall huge upgrade, I would've kept the navy "Ucla" decal, as well as the single navy outline on the numbers. It was a quirk (a design "mistake", some might say) that added a certain flair to the overall look. I would put it in the same category as the Dodgers' red jersey number... in theory it shouldn't work, but in reality it's the detail that makes the whole design work. http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 32 minutes ago, 8BW14 said: The more I see these new UCLA uniforms, the less I like the helmet script in light blue. Everything tells me it should be better this way, but I don't think it contrasts the gold helmet enough like the navy blue lettering does. Disregarding the hideous jersey template and vomit inducing attempt at stripes, I think they should have kept this helmet, even if the blues still don't match. I wonder if adding a navy blue outline would help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Wolf Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 33 minutes ago, 8BW14 said: The more I see these new UCLA uniforms, the less I like the helmet script in light blue. Everything tells me it should be better this way, but I don't think it contrasts the gold helmet enough like the navy blue lettering does. Disregarding the hideous jersey template and vomit inducing attempt at stripes, I think they should have kept this helmet, even if the blues still don't match. Gonna mark the strongly disagree option here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aawagner011 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 This would be a great way of tying in the navy blue and keeping it a traditional UCLA uniform. It makes the navy helmet logo work. I love the new UA set but do think the helmet logo was a misstep and I was also one of the few that thought navy trim worked on the road. Maybe if they have both blues with navy as an accent like this picture, it would be nice. Edit- I'm talking about the navy number trim and the navy helmet logo. I do not like the navy facemask. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Wolf Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, aawagner011 said: This would be a great way of tying in the navy blue and keeping it a traditional UCLA uniform. It makes the navy helmet logo work. I love the new UA set but do think the helmet logo was a misstep and I was also one of the few that thought navy trim worked on the road. Maybe if they have both blues with navy as an accident like this picture, it would be nice. [image of inferior UCLA uniform] Fortunately, the accident has finally been avoided. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 16 minutes ago, aawagner011 said: This would be a great way of tying in the navy blue and keeping it a traditional UCLA uniform. It makes the navy helmet logo work. I love the new UA set but do think the helmet logo was a misstep and I was also one of the few that thought navy trim worked on the road. Maybe if they have both blues with navy as an accident like this picture, it would be nice. I just think the gray facemask works better. . Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aawagner011 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 17 minutes ago, WSU151 said: I just think the gray facemask works better. . Well yeah, I was just talking about the numbers. Gray mask is better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aawagner011 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 33 minutes ago, Red Wolf said: Fortunately, the accident has finally been avoided. Ha! iPhone autocorrect made accent into accident. Whoops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted July 18, 2017 Share Posted July 18, 2017 On 7/16/2017 at 5:28 PM, WSU151 said: I think white numbers in Clarendon (like they used to have and the 2009 alternate) would look better than white numbers in this designed block number font. Note that in 2009 the throwback look didn't have gold in the stripes... I would guess something like this will be worn in 2019 (as an alternate at a minimum) for the 100th anniversary of the school That would be the pinnacle for me, as long as the stripe has the gold in it, and it was the new blue, obviously (as much as I love the color in the photo, it does present contrast issues). I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoHerd35 Posted July 18, 2017 Share Posted July 18, 2017 Marshall just tweeted/Snapchatted some images: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkerws Posted July 18, 2017 Share Posted July 18, 2017 So they updated the white jersey? The green and black are the same aren't they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.