B-Rich Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 5 hours ago, tigerslionspistonshabs said: The nickname list may have just gotten narrowed down a little bit. According to Steve Mattson – the Director of Operations for the New Arena at Seattle Center – the name is going to be “water-related”. https://www.bardown.com/new-information-on-seattle-s-potential-name-may-eliminate-some-current-favourites-1.1223118?fbclid=IwAR06t0_ULbEwnuinnSEse0mKo_Uve8AwCGY5pZN3AMNtUlugESl5B7hK-6Q Pretty sure that the Bardown staff made the same jump from the Twitter quote that Webfooter did, equating "mascot" with "team name".... It is what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgentColon2 Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 Except that I think they meant nickname even though they said mascot. Who the hell has to get used to a mascot. 90% of the people watching from home will never see the mascot or care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king_mahalo Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 1 hour ago, B-Rich said: Pretty sure that the Bardown staff made the same jump from the Twitter quote that Webfooter did, equating "mascot" with "team name".... If you listen to the video where Steve Mattson mentions the name is “water related”, it’s clear they are discussing the team name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krz Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 13 hours ago, Brian in Boston said: Currently? Carolina Mudcats Clearwater Threshers Gwinnett Stripers Idaho Steelheads Jacksonville Sharks Jupiter Hammerheads Miami Marlins Monterey Amberjacks Pensacola Blue Wahoos San Jose Barracuda San Jose Sharks South Carolina Stingrays Tampa Tarpons Toledo Walleye White Sands Pupfish Winnipeg Goldeyes I meant specifically a fish, not a shark or stingray. And in the big four sports. I guess I did forget about Marlins though. Excellent! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 58 minutes ago, KRZYBDGRZ said: I meant specifically a fish, not a shark or stingray. Sharks and rays are fish. Cartilaginous fish, but fish nonetheless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HecEdHooligan Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 On 10/19/2018 at 4:39 PM, andrewharrington said: Not to mention the fact that it would be pretty tone-deaf to hang up anything Thunder-related in the former (and maybe future) home of the Supersonics. The T-Birds used to play in the arena being renovated before moving to Kent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerslionspistonshabs Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 Is there still a chance that the name could be something other than the ones they trademarked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nash61 Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 If it wasn't for the Canucks, I would say just use this for the Sockeyes on Kelowna Rockets jerseys and be done with it. If the Canucks would just lose the stupid orca, this would be doable. On September 20, 2012 at 0:50 AM, 'CS85 said: It's like watching the hellish undead creakily shuffling their way out of the flames of a liposuction clinic dumpster fire. On February 19, 2012 at 9:30 AM, 'pianoknight said: Story B: Red Wings go undefeated and score 100 goals in every game. They also beat a team comprised of Godzilla, the ghost of Abraham Lincoln, 2 Power Rangers and Betty White. Oh, and they played in the middle of Iraq on a military base. In the sand. With no ice. Santa gave them special sand-skates that allowed them to play in shorts and t-shirts in 115 degree weather. Jesus, Zeus and Buddha watched from the sidelines and ate cotton candy. POTD 5/24/12, POTD 2/26/17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VancouverFan69 Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 22 hours ago, nash61 said: If it wasn't for the Canucks, I would say just use this for the Sockeyes on Kelowna Rockets jerseys and be done with it. If the Canucks would just lose the stupid orca, this would be doable. That's a great look if "Sockeyes" is chosen. I would change the turquoise to Kelly green and go with all-Kelly green as the primary dark colour. The whole look would be a fitting tribute to the WHL Totems(First Nations style) and Metropolitans(green & red). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatic Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 23 hours ago, nash61 said: If it wasn't for the Canucks, I would say just use this for the Sockeyes on Kelowna Rockets jerseys and be done with it. If the Canucks would just lose the stupid orca, this would be doable. While I am a big fan of the indigenous PNW art style, it doesn’t work straight up as a logo. It’s far too intricate and detailed. I think it would be a cool direction to go in, but would need to be simplified/streamlined like the Seahawks logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben in LA Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 Just include that S logo with Seattle written in it as at least an alternate and I’m good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krz Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 1 minute ago, Ben in LA said: Just include that S logo with Seattle written in it as at least an alternate and I’m good. This will most likely happen if I had to guess. Excellent! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorMade Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Looks like the logo will feature indigenous art. https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/nhl-seattle-looking-to-incorporate-indigenous-art-into-team-logo/281-d67226ff-9dd3-4c9d-abb3-15337e4118f1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 1 hour ago, TaylorMade said: Looks like the logo will feature indigenous art. https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/nhl-seattle-looking-to-incorporate-indigenous-art-into-team-logo/281-d67226ff-9dd3-4c9d-abb3-15337e4118f1 Good job distinguishing yourselves from your closest geographic rival! PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 1 hour ago, TaylorMade said: Looks like the logo will feature indigenous art. https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/nhl-seattle-looking-to-incorporate-indigenous-art-into-team-logo/281-d67226ff-9dd3-4c9d-abb3-15337e4118f1 I dunno. Sounds more like a journalist stretching a few quotes into a provocative headline. I mean, she’s basing this on “buzz” and some testimony from an artist who “a while ago” talked to a group of nameless persons associated with the team? I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaumatrope Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 1 hour ago, Ice_Cap said: Good job distinguishing yourselves from your closest geographic rival! Considering that the rival in question has re-branded several times in its 40+ year history and has toyed with rebranding again in the last ten years, I'd argue that Seattle could soon have the "indigenous" look all to itself in the not too distant future. Who knows, maybe Seattle horning in on the aesthetic will be all the incentive Vancouver needs to finally commit to a Johnny Canuck based identity. That being said, when I hear "water themed" and "indigenous art" it's difficult to imagine how a brand based on a name like Sockeyes could successfully distinguish itself from the current Canucks identity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 1 hour ago, Thaumatrope said: Considering that the rival in question has re-branded several times in its 40+ year history and has toyed with rebranding again in the last ten years, I'd argue that Seattle could soon have the "indigenous" look all to itself in the not too distant future. Who knows, maybe Seattle horning in on the aesthetic will be all the incentive Vancouver needs to finally commit to a Johnny Canuck based identity. That being said, when I hear "water themed" and "indigenous art" it's difficult to imagine how a brand based on a name like Sockeyes could successfully distinguish itself from the current Canucks identity. Well that’s the problem. And I find adopting a look that’s remincent of your closest geographic rivals in the hope that they’ll change to be risky. Sure, maybe the Canucks go all in on Johnny Canuck. Maybe they don’t, though. And the Seattle Whatevers are just stuck with an off-brand Canucks identity. PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaumatrope Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 4 minutes ago, Ice_Cap said: Well that’s the problem. And I find adopting a look that’s remincent of your closest geographic rivals in the hope that they’ll change to be risky. Sure, maybe the Canucks go all in on Johnny Canuck. Maybe they don’t, though. And the Seattle Whatevers are just stuck with an off-brand Canucks identity. That's a valid concern, but I think the Seattle organization has the potential to execute an indigenous-based identity far better than Vancouver has. The fact that Vancouver has added so many logos in the past decade that fall outside that particular design aesthetic suggests to me that it's not seen as central to their brand. Yes, at the end of the day their primary is heavily influenced by indigenous design, but I think a person would be hard pressed to make the argument that they own it. Maybe a better question to ask is to what extent is the indigenous design aesthetic synonymous with Seattle? Does the community have a strong enough affinity for that aesthetic to the point that it outweighs any potential confusion and/or brand dilution that might occur with Vancouver? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 9 minutes ago, Thaumatrope said: That's a valid concern It’s far more than that. They’re betting another team, whom they have no control over, will change their branding. Why should the Canucks change? 9 minutes ago, Thaumatrope said: Yes, at the end of the day their primary is heavily influenced by indigenous design, but I think a person would be hard pressed to make the argument that they own it. The Canucks are currently the only team in the NHL that used indigenous Pacific Northwest art. They own it as far as the NHL goes. Don’t be silly. 9 minutes ago, Thaumatrope said: Maybe a better question to ask is to what extent is the indigenous design aesthetic synonymous with Seattle? Does the community have a strong enough affinity for that aesthetic to the point that it outweighs any potential confusion and/or brand dilution that might occur with Vancouver? pssst Any claim you can make about Seattle having a connection to indigenous designs you can make about Vancouver. And Vancouver’s had their Pacific Northwest Native art-inspired logo since 1997. PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatic Posted December 18, 2018 Share Posted December 18, 2018 It is silly to create a “water themed indigenous style logo” when your closest geographic rival does the exact same thing. Doesn’t exactly make good branding when you’re a new identity aping your 50 year old neighbour. That said, Seattle can have the native art style for all I care as Vancouver doesn’t exactly pull it off very well. Like it’s been said maybe that’ll finally be the incentive to drop that dumb cetacean from the branding and go with Johnny or the Rink or whatever. As long as they don’t ever stray from blue and green again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.