Gothamite Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 8 hours ago, Gold Pinstripes said: The league is addressing this issue, and this new helmet is an example of manufacturers stepping up. The honest conversation happened several years ago No, it absolutely has not. Not so so long as the NFL pretends that concussions are the problem, instead of the repeated sub-concussive hits that happen in every play of every game. Not so long as the NFL is withholding full funding from CTE research. Not so long as any teams still keep CTE deniers and minimizers on their payrolls. When all that has been addressed, then we can begin our "honest conversation". Until that day, though, it's anything but. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Pinstripes Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 3 hours ago, Gothamite said: No, it absolutely has not. Not so so long as the NFL pretends that concussions are the problem, instead of the repeated sub-concussive hits that happen in every play of every game. Not so long as the NFL is withholding full funding from CTE research. Not so long as any teams still keep CTE deniers and minimizers on their payrolls. When all that has been addressed, then we can begin our "honest conversation". Until that day, though, it's anything but. One team doctor is hardly indicative of the movement the league has made on this issue, and Super Bowl Nation has a strong anti-football bias. I can find high school students with better writing chops than those people. The problem with CTE, is that we still don't know how many minor hits it takes to cause damage. Why a college player has a problem, but many older pros are just fine? So we have to be careful with the assumptions until the facts come in. The repetitive articles don't advance the issue at all, everyone knows a long term NFL player will likely have multiple concussions. These are grown men, making a business decision. No one has ever been forced to play pro ball, many didn't take high school or college seriously when other careers offer more safety and security. Developments like this new helmet are a positive sign moving forward. As usual, facts and reason will carry the day over hysteria. Smart people know we'll be able to have the physical essence of the game, lowering the head trauma, and football will continue to be a positive in our society. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 "Hysteria"? "Smart people know"? You know, it would be easier to lean those facts we all want if the NFL wasn't obstructionist. If, say, they were funding the research they promised to fund. If they'd refused to employ any people at all who have been more problem than solution. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debo0775 Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 20 hours ago, Gothamite said: No, it's not. Except that the league and manufacturers are denying the problem and selling bogus cures. Until they stop, we can't have an honest conversation and we can't actually address the problem. I got temporarily blocked from a major helmet manufacturer's facebook page arguing helmet safety. They touted a new helmet with facemasks specially designed for just that helmet to reduce head trauma...and then touted how you could interchange facemasks from other helmet models to suit your personal #swag. They're dangerous. They don't give a damn about player safety unless it means they can tout some new, safer model at a ridiculous price point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmedges Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 I'm not the biggest football fan but of the games I watch it sure seems like the majority of the defensive players like to use their helmets and by extension their heads as the principal point of contact. It's foolish to blame the NFL or helmet manufacturers because you chose to participate in an activity that is inherently bad for you. The trade off of choosing that particular profession in life is that there is the risk of short and long term injuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webfooter Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 I think one of the biggest issues with college and pro football right now is people trying for knockout or overly hard hits to get noticed when making clean, basic tackles is all that's really necessary to get the job done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guest23 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 3 hours ago, Webfooter said: I think one of the biggest issues with college and pro football right now is people trying for knockout or overly hard hits to get noticed when making clean, basic tackles is all that's really necessary to get the job done. Players have learned to weaponize themselves with modern equipment. When rigid/braced, the area from the crown of the helmet to the end of the shoulder ends up acting as a battering ram or a projectile when airborne. Modern equipment has made things worse because materials are lighter and stronger so they inflict more damage and the players feel less impact which makes the situation exponentially worse. Lastly combine modern traning and strength you've created a negative feedback loop where the level of safety and the risk of catastrophic injury rivals that of the early 20th century when the sport was on the verge of becoming outlawed. I honestly think somebody may die from a hit in the near future. Much like other sports (e.g. auto racing) the league and ncaa may have to detune equipment and enact some rules like prohibiting launching and mandating wrap tackles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandMooreArt Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 17 minutes ago, guest23 said: Much like other sports (e.g. auto racing) the league and ncaa may have to detune equipment and enact some rules like prohibiting launching and mandating wrap tackles. just curious, what example are you hinting at here? restrictor plates in NASCAR? GRAPHIC ARTIST BEHANCE / MEDIUM / DRIBBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 11 hours ago, Gold Pinstripes said: Developments like this new helmet are a positive sign moving forward. As usual, facts and reason will carry the day over hysteria. Smart people know we'll be able to have the physical essence of the game, lowering the head trauma, and football will continue to be a positive in our society. Wow. Is that you, Roger? http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WavePunter Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 20 minutes ago, guest23 said: Players have learned to weaponize themselves with modern equipment. When rigid/braced, the area from the crown of the helmet to the end of the shoulder ends up acting as a battering ram or a projectile when airborne. Modern equipment has made things worse because materials are lighter and stronger so they inflict more damage and the players feel less impact which makes the situation exponentially worse. Lastly combine modern traning and strength you've created a negative feedback loop where the level of safety and the risk of catastrophic injury rivals that of the early 20th century when the sport was on the verge of becoming outlawed. I honestly think somebody may die from a hit in the near future. Much like other sports (e.g. auto racing) the league and ncaa may have to detune equipment and enact some rules like prohibiting launching and mandating wrap tackles. You do realize the occurrence of catastrophic injuries and deaths from collisions has steadily decreased from the game's inception, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WavePunter Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 And I'm no rocket surgeon, but I find it odd that the only non-inflatable pad in a football helmet is the FRONT pad.. So, the pad that gets the most action and protects players in the bulk of the severe collisions is the pad with the least amount of technology.. It's literally just a block of foam in every helmet model I've ever handled... Seems to me that THAT would be a decent place to start improving helmets.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twi Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 6 minutes ago, WavePunter said: And I'm no rocket surgeon, but I find it odd that the only non-inflatable pad in a football helmet is the FRONT pad.. So, the pad that gets the most action and protects players in the bulk of the severe collisions is the pad with the least amount of technology.. It's literally just a block of foam in every helmet model I've ever handled... Seems to me that THAT would be a decent place to start improving helmets.. Different impacts involved, but the same holds true for hockey helmets. All of the cutting edge passing and innovations feature on the sides, back, and top. I believe it has to do with the mounts that hold the cages in each sport, but that seems like something that can be worked around for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WavePunter Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 3 minutes ago, twi said: Different impacts involved, but the same holds true for hockey helmets. All of the cutting edge passing and innovations feature on the sides, back, and top. I believe it has to do with the mounts that hold the cages in each sport, but that seems like something that can be worked around for sure. The access for air in the padding by the temples in a Revo and Speed is in the back of the helmet.. The top access is much closer and could easily provide an air access for the front pad.. But I agree that the hardware is probably the excuse for keeping technology away from the front Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#ConceptLeagues Posted May 25, 2017 Author Share Posted May 25, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont care Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 2 minutes ago, Around the Horn said: All I can think of Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neo_prankster Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Any word on who else is trying out the new Vicis besides Wentz? The Fictional Story of Austus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 1 hour ago, dont care said: All I can think of If it works like they believe it will I'm all for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont care Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 20 hours ago, MJWalker45 said: If it works like they believe it will I'm all for it. Trust me I'm all fo safety too and think the technology is really neat. But they do look like a bunch of pop warner football players with those helmets, at the least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 On 5/18/2017 at 7:59 AM, Gold Pinstripes said: One team doctor is hardly indicative of the movement the league has made on this issue, and Super Bowl Nation has a strong anti-football bias. I can find high school students with better writing chops than those people. The problem with CTE, is that we still don't know how many minor hits it takes to cause damage. Why a college player has a problem, but many older pros are just fine? So we have to be careful with the assumptions until the facts come in. The repetitive articles don't advance the issue at all, everyone knows a long term NFL player will likely have multiple concussions. These are grown men, making a business decision. No one has ever been forced to play pro ball, many didn't take high school or college seriously when other careers offer more safety and security. Developments like this new helmet are a positive sign moving forward. As usual, facts and reason will carry the day over hysteria. Smart people know we'll be able to have the physical essence of the game, lowering the head trauma, and football will continue to be a positive in our society. Alright, awesome. Really good to see Aaron Eckhart's character from Thank You For Smoking has found more work. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.