ChicagoOakland Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 9 minutes ago, Shadojoker said: Pacers still look better than OKC,LAX, Brooklyn,New Orleans, Toronto.. Wish this or the other secondary logo was their center court logo instead. I know this is the shape of Indiana, but this looks like I'm looking at a wall that I can't get past...which, ironically, also describes the Pacers' lack of championships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keynote Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 2 hours ago, DJT said: Font looks better here. Man, that #22 is really testing the tolerances of the interior circle of the word mark. The #33 doesn't look as bad in comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 2 hours ago, DJT said: Font looks better here. I disagree. I think this shows the limitation of the idea. A full two digit number basically touches the text. They need more breathing room to accommodate all numbers. It’s like they designed Lance’s jersey, said “Looks great!” and then sent it off to production without checking how a two digit looks. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DG_ThenNowForever Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 The Pacers went all-in on the dad market; those will look sweet tucked into some Wal-Mart chinos. 1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said: and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YELDARBfield Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 18 minutes ago, keynote said: Man, that #22 is really testing the tolerances of the interior circle of the word mark. The #33 doesn't look as bad in comparison. The 33 looks better because the yellow outline is lost on the white jersey. 22's white outline stands out on the navy, making the number look thicker. Same reason why 22's team name is near illegible. Twitter • Facebook • Instagram • LinkedIn • Tumblr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O.C.D Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 15 minutes ago, andrewharrington said: I disagree. I think this shows the limitation of the idea. A full two digit number basically touches the text. They need more breathing room to accommodate all numbers. It’s like they designed Lance’s jersey, said “Looks great!” and then sent it off to production without checking how a two digit looks. Wow, that's bad. The uniforms I mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hokupguy Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 i did rebrand in nba 2k17 for the pacers few months back i think mine look better then what they have , maybe it my age or just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keynote Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 1 minute ago, Bradbury said: The 33 looks better because the yellow outline is lost on the white jersey. 22's white outline stands out on the navy, making the number look thicker. Same reason why 22's team name is near illegible. Good point. The curved corners of the "3" may also give #33 a little more space; the #22 looks the tightest in the bottom left corner, where the sharp corner of the "2" juts out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowld Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 White uni gets a 7/10 Blue uni gets a 5/10 Have to assume we will see a yellow version as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewMLind Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 There are some things I really like: the full team name on the front, the cornrow design and the shorts in their entirety. My biggest complaints, though, are the outlined numbers and wordmark on the front with single layer names and numbers on the back (on the road set), as well as the truncated side panels -- just have it go all the way down to the shorts. Just looks like an unfinished product. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LakeShow24 Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 6 hours ago, Survival79 said: http://wegrowbasketballhere.com/ The sides look amazing but the front looks horrible. I'm not a fan of crowded letters in a nba jersey (GS did it fine). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 1 hour ago, Shadojoker said: Pacers still look better than OKC,LAX, Brooklyn,New Orleans, Toronto.. Wish this or the other secondary logo was their center court logo instead. HoosierNet Telecom: Connecting The Crossroads ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lbj273 Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 Pair these new sides with a more standard looking jersey front and the Pacers would have had one of the best looks in the league. So close to being a phenomenal uni Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewMLind Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 2 hours ago, Shadojoker said: Pacers still look better than OKC,LAX, Brooklyn,New Orleans, Toronto.. Wish this or the other secondary logo was their center court logo instead. From my experiences driving up and down I-65 north of Indianapolis, the yellow and gray should probably be flipped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamdaviinci Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 It seems like quite a few people on here really like the shorts -- for those of you who do, what is it specifically that you like about them? I can't get past the truncated side panels, the randomly angled cuts that truncate the side panels, and the odd fit of the logo in between the randomly angled cuts truncating the side panels. I just see a handful of design elements that look questionable and lack apparent reason, so I'm genuinely curious as to what positives people see here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodboy13 Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 13 minutes ago, AndrewMLind said: From my experiences driving up and down I-65 north of Indianapolis, the yellow and gray should probably be flipped. These days, that whole section is orange. On 1/25/2013 at 1:53 PM, 'Atom said: For all the bird de lis haters I think the bird de lis isnt supposed to be a pelican and a fleur de lis I think its just a fleur de lis with a pelicans head. Thats what it looks like to me. Also the flair around the tip of the beak is just flair that fleur de lis have sometimes source I am from NOLA. PotD: 10/19/07, 08/25/08, 07/22/10, 08/13/10, 04/15/11, 05/19/11, 01/02/12, and 01/05/12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewMLind Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 Just now, Sodboy13 said: These days, that whole section is orange. Yep. Just made the back-and-forth trip to Chicago for Big Ten Media Days. Glad I don't have a trip up that way again until basketball season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodboy13 Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 80/94 and the Toll Road should be significantly less nightmarish by then, but 65's going to be chewed up through 2018. On 1/25/2013 at 1:53 PM, 'Atom said: For all the bird de lis haters I think the bird de lis isnt supposed to be a pelican and a fleur de lis I think its just a fleur de lis with a pelicans head. Thats what it looks like to me. Also the flair around the tip of the beak is just flair that fleur de lis have sometimes source I am from NOLA. PotD: 10/19/07, 08/25/08, 07/22/10, 08/13/10, 04/15/11, 05/19/11, 01/02/12, and 01/05/12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewMLind Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 6 minutes ago, Hoopladawg87 said: It seems like quite a few people on here really like the shorts -- for those of you who do, what is it specifically that you like about them? I can't get past the truncated side panels, the randomly angled cuts that truncate the side panels, and the odd fit of the logo in between the randomly angled cuts truncating the side panels. I just see a handful of design elements that look questionable and lack apparent reason, so I'm genuinely curious as to what positives people see here. I don't have a good answer when you break it down like that in terms of how it's designed. It seems as if we too often get logos inside of a side panel, and I just like how clean the P looks on the open, white background of the home shorts -- in addition to having already mentioned that I like the cornrows. It's really noticeable here: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upperV03 Posted July 29, 2017 Author Share Posted July 29, 2017 Here's how the Pacers' new navy uniform looks in NBA 2K18: This screenshot also gives us a glimpse at how the Warriors' shorts might translate to Nike's template, and it also gives us a better idea at what the Nike NBA socks will look like. Judging by the Pacers' socks in this screenshot, it looks like there will be team-specific versions available, at least with the team-specific colors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.