lahaye7 Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 14 hours ago, rxmc89 said: I really loved the neo cubist coyote. The collar? Not so much. I am sore,wounded, but not slainI will lay down and bleed a whileAnd then rise up to fight again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4One Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 19 hours ago, rxmc89 said: Long time fan of the Canucks, but I honestly never realized the back of the hem was curved like that until a couple of years ago. It's such a weird decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 On 12/24/2017 at 12:14 AM, Discrimihater said: Among this vein...West Point's camo specials. The only truly unusual thing about these unis was all the camouflage. On a similar note, their current uniform, or at least the one they wore the other day, has a small player name on the chest rather than a large one on the back; fitting for a military academy team. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan33 Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 On 12/23/2017 at 8:48 PM, rxmc89 said: Without question the nadir of the Canuck's ill advised use of Colorado Avalanche colours. Good god that's bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rxmc89 Posted March 15, 2018 Share Posted March 15, 2018 UCF’s sword helmet stripes Purdue’s railroad helmet stripe Vanderbilt’s chain and anchor helmet stripe Funny that all three of these teams wear black and gold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chawls Posted March 15, 2018 Share Posted March 15, 2018 Do these Seahawks unis qualify? Quote If you hadn't noticed, Chawls loves his wrestling, whether it be real life or sim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VandyDelphia Mike Posted March 15, 2018 Share Posted March 15, 2018 NCAA Baseball Champions | 2014, 2019 facebook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted March 15, 2018 Share Posted March 15, 2018 Arizona Rattlers: San Jose SaberCats: POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted March 15, 2018 Share Posted March 15, 2018 On 12/21/2017 at 4:12 PM, Bob5151 said: Some of my favorite uniforms are ones that push boundaries, but don't go overboard and know how to keep things restrained when they have to. Whether it's an unusual color or striping pattern, you can still identify it as a professional team uniform. For example: Baseball: The original Devil Rays uniforms used a gradient, but were otherwise a fairly traditional set. So I'm going to call out the original post here - there's no way that can be called an "otherwise traditional set". In the modern (or any) era of baseball, there hasn't bee one other "stacked" team name, let alone the gradient, let alone the mascot that underlines the whole thing. The damned wordmark takes up the entire front of the jersey! They coudln't even put numbers on it if they wanted to. The sleeve piping, arm patch, and pants may have been traditional, and I guess the cap (though the gradient counts more against tradition to me than maybe it does to others) but the combination of the gradient with the other factors I just mentioned rule this uniform out of contention for this discussion. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted March 15, 2018 Share Posted March 15, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WavePunter Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 9 hours ago, BringBackTheVet said: So I'm going to call out the original post here - there's no way that can be called an "otherwise traditional set". In the modern (or any) era of baseball, there hasn't bee one other "stacked" team name, let alone the gradient, let alone the mascot that underlines the whole thing. The damned wordmark takes up the entire front of the jersey! They coudln't even put numbers on it if they wanted to. The sleeve piping, arm patch, and pants may have been traditional, and I guess the cap (though the gradient counts more against tradition to me than maybe it does to others) but the combination of the gradient with the other factors I just mentioned rule this uniform out of contention for this discussion. Randy Johnson's Diamondbacks would like a word with you.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigers6884 Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 Unconventional colors, but a timeless design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 On 12/24/2017 at 5:46 PM, M4One said: Long time fan of the Canucks, but I honestly never realized the back of the hem was curved like that until a couple of years ago. It's such a weird decision. There were a few uniforms like that around that time. The Preds mustard alt was and maybe a few others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 Baton Rouge Blaze: Similarly, the Liberty Flames: POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferdinand Cesarano Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 12 hours ago, Tigers6884 said: Unconventional colors, but a timeless design. True -- from the front. From the back, there was nothing timeless or classic about this uniform. Seen from that angle, it was pure too-modern-for-its-own-good garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lbj273 Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 1 hour ago, Ferdinand Cesarano said: True -- from the front. From the back, there was nothing timeless or classic about this uniform. Seen from that angle, it was pure too-modern-for-its-own-good garbage. I'd argue it's the best the Diamondbacks ever looked from any angle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 19 hours ago, WavePunter said: Randy Johnson's Diamondbacks would like a word with you.. Ha I was actually thinking of that one and just didn’t mention it. It was terrible and theres a reason they abandoned it. Because it was terrible. That was the reason. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 16 hours ago, Tigers6884 said: Unconventional colors, but a timeless design. Thats a fantastic uniform. Those aren’t easy colors to make a classic set out of, but they did just that. I don’t love the back number or nob font, but I can live with that considering the awesomeness of the front. Remind me - was it cream or white? I hope cream. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coco1997 Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 On 12/22/2017 at 12:12 PM, insert name said: What year did the Tigers wear racing stripes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroCree Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 1 hour ago, coco1997 said: What year did the Tigers wear racing stripes? 1994 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.