panthers_2012 Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 The Browns I have a hard one buying. They only switched in 2015, so they 5 year role is still in effect. I also have a hard time believing the Browns are going to a white helmet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WavePunter Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 The Jags aren't wearing the Vapor Untouchable template.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 11 hours ago, unimaniac said: I know this probably isn't a popular opinion, but all the Jags need to do is make the helmet all black and make the numbers on the teal jersey white w/ black outlines (and make it the primary), and it'd be great. I know opinions can't be wrong, but... It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizzaman7294 Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 Anyone seen the Super Bowl program? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizzaman7294 Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 Just now, Pizzaman7294 said: Anyone seen the Super Bowl program? Just kidding. http://www.superbowlprogram.us/official-super-bowl-programs/ Ships out Jan. 26 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYCdog Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 5 hours ago, Pizzaman7294 said: Anyone seen the Super Bowl program? Interested to see if the current Super Bowl logo format is followed, what color Atlanta chooses. Red would be an obvious favorite but I don’t Atlanta wants anymore reminders of Super Bowl LI. I hope we see Peach instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizzaman7294 Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 That's a great call. Peach would be different and sweet. (ha, get it?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizzaman7294 Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 24 minutes ago, Pizzaman7294 said: That's a great call. Peach would be different and sweet. (ha, get it?) My guess based on our thoughts. Screams more Miami to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 Seems like the "peach" needs to be softer than that pretty brilliant orange. Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 Minnesota’s hosting this year, and the logo has blue highlights. Not necessarily a colour that ties into the team or locale. What makes anyone think the Super Bowl LIII logo will tie into Georgia in any meaningful way? PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrimalCookie Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 On 1/14/2018 at 9:22 AM, unimaniac said: I know this probably isn't a popular opinion, but all the Jags need to do is make the helmet all black and make the numbers on the teal jersey white w/ black outlines (and make it the primary), and it'd be great. 100% agreed with you there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizzaman7294 Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 13 hours ago, Ice_Cap said: Minnesota’s hosting this year, and the logo has blue highlights. Not necessarily a colour that ties into the team or locale. What makes anyone think the Super Bowl LIII logo will tie into Georgia in any meaningful way? Light blue ties into the whole Northern-esque feel of the Northern lights and snow feel. Their host website portrays that -> https://www.mnsuperbowl.com/about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djam2410 Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 14 hours ago, Ice_Cap said: Minnesota’s hosting this year, and the logo has blue highlights. Not necessarily a colour that ties into the team or locale. What makes anyone think the Super Bowl LIII logo will tie into Georgia in any meaningful way? I'm thinking that the logo will represent Atlanta in some way so that counts right ? Cal Bears | Miami Dolphins | Cleveland Cavaliers |@dcjames5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizzaman7294 Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 4 hours ago, djam2410 said: I'm thinking that the logo will represent Atlanta in some way so that counts right ? It can represent the area without being a color of the NFL team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MellowTheMyth Posted January 21, 2018 Share Posted January 21, 2018 I would like to see, at some point, Cleveland retire their Browns identity and start anew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted January 21, 2018 Share Posted January 21, 2018 35 minutes ago, Bolt957 said: I would like to see, at some point, Cleveland retire their Browns identity and start anew. Why on earth should they do that? Because they’ve lost a lot in recent decades? Should the Cubs have retired theirs? The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFGiants58 Posted January 21, 2018 Share Posted January 21, 2018 45 minutes ago, Gothamite said: Why on earth should they do that? Because they’ve lost a lot in recent decades? Should the Cubs have retired theirs? While I don't agree with that sentiment (that the Browns should dump their name), I get the reasoning. The expansion Browns (1999-present) have largely been failures, with only one playoff appearance and only one win in the past two calendar years. It's merely asking for the team to act like the crummy expansion franchise that they are, and not like the continuation of the team that's now the Ravens. MLB: Project 32 (Complete), MLB: The Defunct Saga (Complete) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted January 21, 2018 Share Posted January 21, 2018 That might make sense if they weren’t the same franchise. But since the franchise certificate was deliberately and purposely left behind in Cleveland when the team moved, they are. I know a lot of people want to draw distinctions, but this isn’t a Baltimore Orioles or Milwaukee Brewers situation. They actually are the same franchise. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
habsfan1 Posted January 21, 2018 Share Posted January 21, 2018 I used to think that the Jaguars made themselves a new gradient helmet with gold fading to black. I thought it was a cool new idea, so I gave it a chance. But when I saw them in action during a game, I noticed it's actually half gold directly seperated by the other half in black. Very little to no gradient used. With that said, their creation looks pretty bad and needs to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferdinand Cesarano Posted January 21, 2018 Share Posted January 21, 2018 2 hours ago, Gothamite said: That might make sense if they weren’t the same franchise. But since the franchise certificate was deliberately and purposely left behind in Cleveland when the team moved, they are. I know a lot of people want to draw distinctions, but this isn’t a Baltimore Orioles or Milwaukee Brewers situation. They actually are the same franchise. Unalloyed nonsense. That "certificate" business was pure theatre, a sleight-of-hand designed to combat the threat of litigation. The original intent had been to operate as the Baltimore Browns, in keeping with the practice of the Cardinals, Rams, Colts, Raiders, Dodgers, baseball Giants, Braves, A's; in other words: the way the vast majority of moves had been handled. This was the plan until the Clevelanders pulled their Special Snowflake act, which led to the NFL's contriving a new approach so as to appease the braying horde (thereby defiling the record books and establish a toxic precedent). No new name can alter the reality that the original Browns' franchise is in Baltimore now, and that the current team is a newly-created entity that dates to 1999. The NFL gets to count its statistics any way it likes. But it does not get to alter the objective facts of history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.