johnnysama Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 https://www.forbes.com/sites/macaelamackenzie/2018/09/26/the-new-weight-watchers-doesnt-want-to-talk-about-weight-ww-is-all-about-wellness/ - Sorta related to the recent change to Dunkin' Donuts becoming simply Dunkin', but Weight Watchers has undergone a change and is now..... WW. It also has a new logo to go along with it: I don't know what to make of this. It just seems.... rather bizarre. It also conjures up images of WWE or the WWF. Thumbs down for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujju2 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C-Squared Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Two W's for whitewashed. If the stated goal for the rebrand was a bigger target market, I could at least get behind the concept, but this change was sparked by the fattest society in human history thinking dieting is unhealthy. I'm curious to see if the brand can successfully attract new non-weight-focused demos or if they simply push away their existing customers. My TeePublic Shop My Instagram Art Page Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockyTopper Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Who could that be? Woodrow Wilson? Willy Wonka? ....Walter White? ☦ICXC NIKA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilSox Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Funny you would mention WWE. Something along these lines would have been much more suitable. I can see why they want to rebrand, but this just feels... forced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferdinand Cesarano Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 2 hours ago, johnnysama said: I don't know what to make of this. It just seems.... rather bizarre. Bizarre is right. The six-syllable mouthful "double-u double-u" is twice the length of the former name "Weight Watchers", and is just a nightmarish name for a product line. 54 minutes ago, RockyTopper said: Who could that be? Woodrow Wilson? Willy Wonka? ....Walter White? It ain't Vendell Vilkie! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaz Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 lol what a joke; and you wonder why us Americans are a bunch of fat :censored:s nowadays Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 3 hours ago, C-Squared said: Two W's for whitewashed. If the stated goal for the rebrand was a bigger target market, I could at least get behind the concept, but this change was sparked by the fattest society in human history thinking dieting is unhealthy. I'm curious to see if the brand can successfully attract new non-weight-focused demos or if they simply push away their existing customers. Their existing customers are very loyal and they appreciate the accountability of the meetings. Those who left have felt shamed and that thinness was a concentration from many counselors. Plus, wearing a FitBit or Apple Watch to track their caloric intake, and can use the internet for support and recipes than going to meetings. As for the "WW", Warner Bros./DC comics might raise a stink. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CS85 Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 puts two capital Ws on top of one another "That'll be $150,000 please." Quote "You are nothing more than a small cancer on this message board. You are not entertaining, you are a complete joke." twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.