Jump to content

NFL changes 2019


FightingGoldenDevil

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, 63Bulldogs63 said:

I would like to see the NFL go 94 again and teams where throwbacks for the occaision. Even if its a throwback to 94 and with the one helmet rule some teams looking like the teams that half assed the 75th anniversary, I'd still be ok.

 

Stupidly, I think the NFL has announced they’re going to do the exact opposite and instead of focusing on the league’s history, they’re focusing on the future. I almost half expect to see a bunch of dumbass TATC style uniforms and graphics. 

spacer.png

On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said:
She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Survival79 said:

Speaking of black, does it bug anyone else that the Chiefs have black in their logo but nowhere else?

 

QljBmU4.png

 

And can we please get something on the nose bumper?

 

EZtSkPP.png

 

naw, i think the black outline is good. it makes for high contrast and is in no way offensive in its aesthetics; it works really well and looks nice. the black around the monogram could probably go though.

 

OD0Dnky.png

 

GRAPHIC ARTIST

BEHANCE  /  MEDIUM  /  DRIBBBLE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Survival79 said:

Speaking of black, does it bug anyone else that the Chiefs have black in their logo but nowhere else?

 

QljBmU4.png

 

And can we please get something on the nose bumper?

 

EZtSkPP.png

 

Yes! I think they could either keep the black around the arrowhead or around the “KC” but have at least one outlined in yellow. I think that would make it look a lot better.

 

I’ve also wondered if they should get helmet stripping to match the jerseys and pants, but maybe that might make the helmet too crowded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve always believed Kansas City should drop the black outline and have a simple, white arrowhead with a red, interlocking KC inside. The only issue with that is the use of the logo on other applications. It’s fine on a red, black or yellow background, but the arrowhead would be non-existent on white. It needs an outline. That said, you’d probably have to have a red or yellow outline (the former disappearing into the helmet and the latter being a much different look than you have now). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BrandMooreArt said:

 

naw, i think the black outline is good. it makes for high contrast and is in no way offensive in its aesthetics; it works really well and looks nice. the black around the monogram could probably go though.

 

OD0Dnky.png

 

 

Love that red face mask. The white always looked weird to me.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never understood why the Chiefs didn't just make the KC yellow. That seems like a pretty easy solution to that issue. 

spacer.png

On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said:
She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Survival79 said:

Speaking of black, does it bug anyone else that the Chiefs have black in their logo but nowhere else?

 

QljBmU4.png

 

And can we please get something on the nose bumper?

 

EZtSkPP.png

 

Of course. It’s completely senseless to stick with it when the center example you posted looks every bit as good (and would coordinate fantastically with the typography in their uniform). Tradition or not, it makes little sense to omit one of your main team colors in favor of a non-team color in your most important branding tools.

 

Black has more contrast against white, but less contrast against red, so that’s literally six of one, half dozen of another when compared to gold (sorry, Brandon :-).

 

I also love the look of 60s-era Chiefs garb, which often featured more gold.

 

a774fa38b86a973659e7136444deff77.jpg

 

This one is interesting, as well.

 

30f51b2ba69dad2aa4aa5bc4900edbf6.jpg

 

I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry

[The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, AndrewMLind said:

I’ve always believed Kansas City should drop the black outline and have a simple, white arrowhead with a red, interlocking KC inside. The only issue with that is the use of the logo on other applications. It’s fine on a red, black or yellow background, but the arrowhead would be non-existent on white. It needs an outline. That said, you’d probably have to have a red or yellow outline (the former disappearing into the helmet and the latter being a much different look than you have now). 

 

In that case, you’d just reverse it to a red arrowhead with a white monogram. The arrowhead logo doesn’t rely on a specific dark/light relationship to work, which is what makes it a good, versatile mark. Truth be told, I think that would be much better than how they currently handle their logo across different background colors. The logo appears a bit blah on white because it’s 90% white, and they curiously add a white keyline to the arrowhead for dark backgrounds, which are not functionally needed on black or gold, and makes the red background variant different than what’s on their helmet.

I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry

[The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/10/2019 at 5:58 PM, WavePunter said:

Why would they wear silver pants to match their blue helmets?

Either I wrote it wrong or you have misread. The Cowboys don't have blue helmets nor should they. I meant that I would like to see the pants be the same shade of silver as their helmets are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, andrewharrington said:

 

In that case, you’d just reverse it to a red arrowhead with a white monogram. The arrowhead logo doesn’t rely on a specific dark/light relationship to work, which is what makes it a good, versatile mark. Truth be told, I think that would be much better than how they currently handle their logo across different background colors. The logo appears a bit blah on white because it’s 90% white, and they curiously add a white keyline to the arrowhead for dark backgrounds, which are not functionally needed on black or gold, and makes the red background variant different than what’s on their helmet.

 

I guess I should have been more specific, because I agree that would be the ideal application. I was just keeping their current style guide (which notably makes an exception on the keyline when the logo is specifically used on the helmet) in mind, so that’s my bad for not being clear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.