Jump to content

Yellow Jacket Logo


chickenfish13

Recommended Posts

Hey guys. I'm waiting for c and c in my CHL redesign, but I have been working on this for a couple weeks now, and wanted some feedback. It is for a yellow jacket, and a baseball team, but it has no name right now. It's an update to a logo I did a looooong time ago, and I'd like to know what I can do to make it better. Thanks for the help, and c and c as always.

I feel the shadowing and highlights is definitely off, so that would be a focus point. Thanks.

yellowjacket.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would move the highlights to the face, so the body has a color progression/rendering is more consistent with the wings. I like the hexagon, but the angle of the bee is causing an optical illusion where it looks tilted. I don't necessarily care for the swoosh of the ball. You could try putting seems on the hexagon. Also, the antennas, legs and eyes could be rendered better. I like the idea, it just needs some tweaking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It still has the same issue as before: inconsistent shading. The left side of the thorax has a white highlight while the yellow shadow of the wings is also on the left side. The thick black areas on the body read as shadows, and they should be on the left, like the yellow on the wings. It's not going to look much better without fixing this issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It still has the same issue as before: inconsistent shading. The left side of the thorax has a white highlight while the yellow shadow of the wings is also on the left side. The thick black areas on the body read as shadows, and they should be on the left, like the yellow on the wings. It's not going to look much better without fixing this issue.

See above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with this is that it looks like you are rendering what you think a yellow jacket should look like, and not what they actually look like. Strong logos combine a little bit of the abstract and simplification with correct proportions and dimensions. Look.

yellow_jacket.jpg

For yours,

-wings look completely wrong

-middle section looks too bulbous

-head and antennae are off

-your legs are really weak

Now, I appreciate creative liberties and some abstract work, but this looks like something drawn by an elementary schooler and it just needs to refined a great deal. It's too static and childish looking, for lack of a better word.

I agree with bohob that the shadows hold this back as well. But I think that brings up a good point, most of your concepts have some type of bevel or shadow, and you don't need it half the time. Sometimes shadows and highlights look good when you go back and add them, but for your concepts, it's like you come up with a logo base, don't really refine it, and then just add highlights for good measure, to possibly make it look better. What you need to do is work on getting the shape and dimensions down first, get the basic drafts done, then go back and add detail, if necessary.

One thing I like about this concept is the attempt at a honeycomb motif in the background, I think if you straightened it out, deleted the (very crooked) highlight, and made it smaller it would be a much better backdrop. But you could definitely use a honeycomb in secondary logos.

If I know you, you will put the comments to good use, keep working at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The shape is a honeycomb, wasn't sure about it, but wanted to try it. And he's not looking over his shoulder, he's looking straight. If you see something else, could you maybe explain how, so I can try and fix it?

i was looking at one of your older versioms when i mentioned the looking over the shoulder thing. the black part of the eye looked like the pupil looking down and backwards but maybe the yellow part whas a highlight and not the 'white' part of the eye if that makes any sense. now i get the honey comb shape in the back. i never realized in the NO Hornets H logo that it was the honey comb shape either. i guess i dont know where you can go from here without making huge changes and i know that is really vague feedback

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.