Viper

Say it ain't so, Joe

Recommended Posts

kroywen    1,400

Kill the program. Kill the entire freaking program. Just drive a stake into it and turn Happy Valley into cow pasture.

 

(Seriously, it's a travesty that the program didn't receive a year-long death penalty to begin with. Never has a program been more deserving of it.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CS85    5,236
2 minutes ago, kroywen said:

Kill the program. Kill the entire freaking program. Just drive a stake into it and turn Happy Valley into cow pasture.

 

(Seriously, it's a travesty that the program didn't receive a year-long death penalty to begin with. Never has a program been more deserving of it.)

 

They didn't then, and they won't now.  Paterno being dead and Sandusky in jail is likely as far as the NCAA will go.  They want this story to similarly die off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the admiral    10,240
58 minutes ago, kroywen said:

Kill the program. Kill the entire freaking program. Just drive a stake into it and turn Happy Valley into cow pasture.

 

Give us a Flyers-Penguins game at Beaver Stadium first. Then turn it into cow pasture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Viola73    73
2 hours ago, Ice_Cap said:

Joe Paterno may have known of an earlier Jerry Sandusky abuse claim according to a police report.


http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/09/us/penn-state-paterno-sandusky-police-report/index.html

Abuse or horseplay, because McQueary can't keep a story straight with a ruler. So depending on what McQueary ACTUALLY told Paterno, at this point I don't think McQueary really evens knows, is the basis on which to judge this new information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Viola73    73
2 hours ago, CS85 said:

 

They didn't then, and they won't now.  Paterno being dead and Sandusky in jail is likely as far as the NCAA will go.  They want this story to similarly die off.

True.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rams80    2,752
56 minutes ago, Viola73 said:

Abuse or horseplay, because McQueary can't keep a story straight with a ruler. So depending on what McQueary ACTUALLY told Paterno, at this point I don't think McQueary really evens knows, is the basis on which to judge this new information.

 

What did Joe Paterno do to you to earn such undying loyalty?

 

....

 

 

Wait, don't answer that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
McCarthy    6,620

This isn't the first time it's come out that Paterno knew about the abuse as far back as the 19 hundred and 70's and continued to employ him until the damn mid 90's. None of that has anything to do with Mike McQueary. 

 

Sorry your football grandfather was an undeniably terrible person. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DnBronc    40
9 hours ago, Ice_Cap said:

Joe Paterno may have known of an earlier Jerry Sandusky abuse claim according to a police report.


http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/09/us/penn-state-paterno-sandusky-police-report/index.html

 

I heard about those claims in the 70's (that the article mentions). He turned his back on this for years. What a disgraceful situation. I will never root for Penn St. again. 

 

Wonder if Dan Bernstein (a talk show host with The Score in Chicago) will say anything about this on Monday. He has been all over this for the last six years. He even talked to Anthony Lubrano (a Penn St. trustee and a Goldman Sachs chairman?) last year on the air. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dfwabel    993

They received their NCAA penalty.

 

Their accreditation, which was reaffirmed in 2015, but in April, MSCHE was OK with Penn State and their self-study from the 2015 report. There are annual inspections, but reopening this is unlikely as they've complied since the 'Warning" in 2012.

 

 

http://news.psu.edu/story/481561/2017/09/08/administration/middle-states-accepts-penn-state’s-monitoring-report-and

 

Oh, and Sara Ganim really deserved her Pulitzer Prize at age 24.  She's very much not #fakenews

 

Edited by dfwabel
Ganim comment

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Viola73    73
17 hours ago, rams80 said:

 

What did Joe Paterno do to you to earn such undying loyalty?

 

....

 

 

Wait, don't answer that.

Was Joe flawed....yes....we all are. Was Joe a saint....no....none of us are. Was Joe a great football coach....yes....one of the best. I guess it comes down to having respect for a man in a terrible situation that he never faced before, who handled it to the best of his knowledge, and who is forever tarnished by waiting 24 hours to alert the higher ups. Joe did what he was suppose to do at this time and place and it seems as though that JOE is the one who committed these atrocities in the minds of people. That is his crime...his court of public opinion crime...waiting.

I mean its not like Joe physically assaulted a student athlete on national television, like Ohio State's godlike Woody Hayes or Indiana's Bobby Knight choking one of his players in practice. I guess it would have been better for Joe to take a swing at a player than to wait to alert the higher ups to a situation that he never witnessed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Viola73    73
18 hours ago, McCarthy said:

This isn't the first time it's come out that Paterno knew about the abuse as far back as the 19 hundred and 70's and continued to employ him until the damn mid 90's. None of that has anything to do with Mike McQueary. 

 

Sorry your football grandfather was an undeniably terrible person. 

The 70's? Proof?

Well, since its McQueary who is making this statement that Joe can't refute, since he's dead, I'd say this is about McQueary and the liar that he is, which is commonly known throughout Centre County. 

 

 

Sandusky, who is an undeniably terrible person, was not my football grandfather. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Viola73    73
9 hours ago, dfwabel said:

They received their NCAA penalty.

 

Their accreditation, which was reaffirmed in 2015, but in April, MSCHE was OK with Penn State and their self-study from the 2015 report. There are annual inspections, but reopening this is unlikely as they've complied since the 'Warning" in 2012.

 

 

http://news.psu.edu/story/481561/2017/09/08/administration/middle-states-accepts-penn-state’s-monitoring-report-and

 

Oh, and Sara Ganim really deserved her Pulitzer Prize at age 24.  She's very much not #fakenews

 

This is correct, and since they have made the changes in policy and procedure in these matters....which hopefully they will never have to use them, but we live in this type of world now....they have shown commitment to righting wrongs. The NCAA will not look at revisiting any type of sanctions based on the words of McQueary.

As for Sara Ganim....I always wondered how she obtained those sealed transcripts? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gothamite    5,897
46 minutes ago, Viola73 said:

Was Joe flawed....yes....we all are. Was Joe a saint....no....none of us are. Was Joe a great football coach....yes....one of the best.

 

Holy :censored: , man. 

 

I really wish this was a parody.   Because taken at face value, it's actually very sad. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BlackBolt3    1,123

We aren't far from his "both sides" argument. "Those kids weren't perfect anyway, did you know that one of them failed 3rd grade math?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the admiral    10,240
4 hours ago, Viola73 said:

As for Sara Ganim....I always wondered how she obtained those sealed transcripts? 

To the extent that you already haven't, tell us your theory!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BringBackTheVet    4,173
6 hours ago, Viola73 said:

Was Joe flawed....yes....we all are. Was Joe a saint....no....none of us are. Was Joe a great football coach....yes....one of the best. I guess it comes down to having respect for a man in a terrible situation that he never faced before, who handled it to the best of his knowledge, and who is forever tarnished by waiting 24 hours to alert the higher ups. Joe did what he was suppose to do at this time and place and it seems as though that JOE is the one who committed these atrocities in the minds of people. That is his crime...his court of public opinion crime...waiting.

I mean its not like Joe physically assaulted a student athlete on national television, like Ohio State's godlike Woody Hayes or Indiana's Bobby Knight choking one of his players in practice. I guess it would have been better for Joe to take a swing at a player than to wait to alert the higher ups to a situation that he never witnessed.

 

I'll explain this respectfully.

 

1. Joe knew, whether when McQuery told him or before (almost undoubtedly before), that Sandusky was doing this.  FACT

2. Joe told his superiors.  OK, that's protocol. FACT

3. Nothing happened. FACT.  Maybe Joe influenced this, possibly it was the higher-ups protecting the image of the program. OPINION (I think) Doesn't necessarily matter.

4. Joe knew that Sandusky was free, assaulting children.  FACT.  He shrugged his shoulders and moved on with his life.  He was either OK with it right away, or accepted that the higher-ups didn't want to take action.  He did not notify the authorities, he did not pursue it any further.  He was OK and content with the knowledge that Sandusky was doing this.  FACT

5. Joe is the most powerful and influential figure in State College.  More powerful and influential than the higher-ups.  FACT.  He had the power to trigger an investigation, and if the police chose not to, he could have gone to the media or some other channel.  

6.  In this case, the "chain of command" is flawed, because the coach is higher up on the influence chain than his bosses.  At major college programs, the coach is the most important person, not the president or AD.  OPINION, but hard to argue.

7.  Joe's inaction directly lead to the continued abuse of children by Sandusky.  FACT.  The accountability lies with all of them - Spainer, the other guy, Joe, McQuery, everyone.  However, in any business, the boss bears the ultimate responsibility.  It's entirely possible (hell - it happened!) that nobody would listen to McQuery.  It's entirely possible (hell, it happened!) that the president had a conflict of interest and would choose to ignore it.  It would not have been the case that anyone in any law enforcement position would ignore Paterno had he chosen to pursue it.

 

  • Joe is responsible for every abuse that occurred after the first time he knew.  So is everyone involved, but he was in the best position to stop it.  Respectfully, I don't see any reasonable argument against this.

 

Sandusky bears the full responsibility for all of his actions, but Joe shares it from the point he knew and on.  It's the same with any crime, however there aren't many (if any) crimes worse than this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CS85    5,236

Once again, it comes down to the old saying:

 

A man can build 1000 bridges and :censored: one goat.  He won't be known as a bridge-builder; he'll be known as a goat :censored: er.  

 

A coach can win 1000 football games and enable one pedophile.  He won't be known as a winning coach; he'll be known as a pedophile enabler.

 

Vicariously, idiot fans who keep wanting to shift focus on the accomplishments a guy had on a goddamn football program as more important than turning a blind eye to children being raped and abused should be remembered for being pedophile excuse makers.  No sympathy or understanding.  You're cool with children being raped so long as football program is good.  That's about where it ends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now