29texan

NIKE NFL Uniforms

Recommended Posts

No Change

Cardinals

Falcons

Vikings

Nike is definitely going to do everything it can to rework the three worst uniforms in the league, especially since they were all done under Reebok's watch.

Worst by your standards maybe, but by mine they are the three best modern looks in the NFL. But the worst, that would have to go to the Browns, Jaguars, and Cowboys in my opinion.

I'm praying the Cards, Falcons, and Vikings burn those templates. By far the worst uniforms in the NFL. All 3 franchises have had amazing uniforms at one point in their existence. It's a shame they don't go back to them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No Change

Cardinals

Falcons

Vikings

Nike is definitely going to do everything it can to rework the three worst uniforms in the league, especially since they were all done under Reebok's watch.

Worst by your standards maybe, but by mine they are the three best modern looks in the NFL. But the worst, that would have to go to the Browns, Jaguars, and Cowboys in my opinion.

I'm praying the Cards, Falcons, and Vikings burn those templates. By far the worst uniforms in the NFL. All 3 franchises have had amazing uniforms at one point in their existence. It's a shame they don't go back to them.

I actually think the Bengals have the worst uniforms in the NFL...

With Arizona, Minnesota & Atlanta falling in line behind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No Change

Cardinals

Falcons

Vikings

Nike is definitely going to do everything it can to rework the three worst uniforms in the league, especially since they were all done under Reebok's watch.

Worst by your standards maybe, but by mine they are the three best modern looks in the NFL. But the worst, that would have to go to the Browns, Jaguars, and Cowboys in my opinion.

I'm praying the Cards, Falcons, and Vikings burn those templates. By far the worst uniforms in the NFL. All 3 franchises have had amazing uniforms at one point in their existence. It's a shame they don't go back to them.

I actually think the Bengals have the worst uniforms in the NFL...

With Arizona, Minnesota & Atlanta falling in line behind.

True

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No Change

Cardinals

Falcons

Vikings

Nike is definitely going to do everything it can to rework the three worst uniforms in the league, especially since they were all done under Reebok's watch.

Worst by your standards maybe, but by mine they are the three best modern looks in the NFL. But the worst, that would have to go to the Browns, Jaguars, and Cowboys in my opinion.

I'm praying the Cards, Falcons, and Vikings burn those templates. By far the worst uniforms in the NFL. All 3 franchises have had amazing uniforms at one point in their existence. It's a shame they don't go back to them.

I actually think the Bengals have the worst uniforms in the NFL...

With Arizona, Minnesota & Atlanta falling in line behind.

The Bengals just need to remove the white panels under the arms of the Jersey and their set is great!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the vikings jerseys are far better than their pants. I really love the Cardinals set, especially the jerseys as well.

For the Falcons, I feel the opposite. I never really liked their shoulder and under arm design, but their pants is piping done right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Broncos are deffiently making some changes. Not sure why they are on the no changes list...

Just a guess, but it could be because the entire list is just the opinion of some guy on the internet.

On topic, I agree with BBTV. Unless you have some sort of confirmed inside information, all of this is nothing but pure speculation. My opinion is this: The NFL, and by extension, the teams that make it up, are so freaky about their brand that they aren't going to let Nike "go Oregon" on anyone. Nike is big and they call the shots for a lot of teams in college football, but this isn't college football. This is the NFL we're talking about and the NFL doesn't take walking orders from anyone. That's something we should keep in mind while we're chasing our tails trying to figure out (yet again) what Nike's "plans" are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The NFL, and by extension, the teams that make it up, are so freaky about their brand that they aren't going to let Nike "go Oregon" on anyone. Nike is big and they call the shots for a lot of teams in college football, but this isn't college football. This is the NFL we're talking about and the NFL doesn't take walking orders from anyone.

If only the NCAA would grow such a spine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bengals just need to remove the white panels under the arms of the Jersey and their set is great!

SMH

The only thing missing from the current disastrous look are these pants. If they are committed to looking like a big pajama party, may as well complete the look. lol

IMG_2492.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the vikings jerseys are far better than their pants. I really love the Cardinals set, especially the jerseys as well.

For the Falcons, I feel the opposite. I never really liked their shoulder and under arm design, but their pants is piping done right.

I agree that the Falcons pants are done right. I just wish the still wore the black pants.

The Bengals just need to remove the white panels under the arms of the Jersey and their set is great!

SMH

The only thing missing from the current disastrous look are these pants. If they are committed to looking like a big pajama party, may as well complete the look. lol

IMG_2492.jpg

Sorry, but I am too old to try to figure out what kids acronyms are these days, what is SMH?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the vikings jerseys are far better than their pants. I really love the Cardinals set, especially the jerseys as well.

For the Falcons, I feel the opposite. I never really liked their shoulder and under arm design, but their pants is piping done right.

I agree that the Falcons pants are done right. I just wish the still wore the black pants.

The Bengals just need to remove the white panels under the arms of the Jersey and their set is great!

SMH

The only thing missing from the current disastrous look are these pants. If they are committed to looking like a big pajama party, may as well complete the look. lol

IMG_2492.jpg

Sorry, but I am too old to try to figure out what kids acronyms are these days, what is SMH?

Well, I'm too old to be called a "kid", but thanks. For someone that only seems to like modern uniforms (regardless if they look good or not), I would've thought you of all people would be well versed in text message/internet lingo. Honestly, I thought you were under 17 (not bashing you, I'm really not). You fooled me, congrats! :P

Here you go, hun.

The List of Chat Acronyms & Text Message Shorthand

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Broncos are deffiently making some changes. Not sure why they are on the no changes list...

Just a guess, but it could be because the entire list is just the opinion of some guy on the internet.

On topic, I agree with BBTV. Unless you have some sort of confirmed inside information, all of this is nothing but pure speculation. My opinion is this: The NFL, and by extension, the teams that make it up, are so freaky about their brand that they aren't going to let Nike "go Oregon" on anyone. Nike is big and they call the shots for a lot of teams in college football, but this isn't college football. This is the NFL we're talking about and the NFL doesn't take walking orders from anyone. That's something we should keep in mind while we're chasing our tails trying to figure out (yet again) what Nike's "plans" are.

Yeah I already made that clear (with a post AND the title itself). It is just some guy's (my) opinion. That's why I said don't take it too seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Broncos are deffiently making some changes. Not sure why they are on the no changes list...

Just a guess, but it could be because the entire list is just the opinion of some guy on the internet.

On topic, I agree with BBTV. Unless you have some sort of confirmed inside information, all of this is nothing but pure speculation. My opinion is this: The NFL, and by extension, the teams that make it up, are so freaky about their brand that they aren't going to let Nike "go Oregon" on anyone. Nike is big and they call the shots for a lot of teams in college football, but this isn't college football. This is the NFL we're talking about and the NFL doesn't take walking orders from anyone. That's something we should keep in mind while we're chasing our tails trying to figure out (yet again) what Nike's "plans" are.

Yeah I already made that clear (with a post AND the title itself). It is just some guy's (my) opinion. That's why I said don't take it too seriously.

I for one don't believe the rumors on here or on uniwatch until I see it. As for the Broncos, wasn't Nike the ones that created their current look in the first place? If so, why would they change it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the vikings jerseys are far better than their pants. I really love the Cardinals set, especially the jerseys as well.

For the Falcons, I feel the opposite. I never really liked their shoulder and under arm design, but their pants is piping done right.

I agree that the Falcons pants are done right. I just wish the still wore the black pants.

The Bengals just need to remove the white panels under the arms of the Jersey and their set is great!

SMH

The only thing missing from the current disastrous look are these pants. If they are committed to looking like a big pajama party, may as well complete the look. lol

IMG_2492.jpg

Sorry, but I am too old to try to figure out what kids acronyms are these days, what is SMH?

Well, I'm too old to be called a "kid", but thanks. For something that only seems to like modern uniforms (regardless if they look good or not), I would've thought you of all people would be well versed in text message/internet lingo.

Here you go, hun.

The List of Chat Acronyms & Text Message Shorthand

My rule when texting is that when someone uses acronyms then I quit talking to them. I am sorry if I offended you, but I find it lazy when someone does not type out what they are saying. That is nothing against you, but how I just personally feel. But the reason I like modern uniform designs is because growing up as a Cleveland Browns fan from 1979-1995 I just got tired of their same old look season after season and when they left Cleveland I just changed. I do like classic uniform designs but I believe certain teams should change up their look after several years. Especially when a team like Arizona moved into University of Phoenix Stadium, they had a modern stadium and their look needed a modern feel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My rule when texting is that when someone uses acronyms then I quit talking to them. I am sorry if I offended you, but I find it lazy when someone does not type out what they are saying. That is nothing against you, but how I just personally feel. But the reason I like modern uniform designs is because growing up as a Cleveland Browns fan from 1979-1995 I just got tired of their same old look season after season and when they left Cleveland I just changed. I do like classic uniform designs but I believe certain teams should change up their look after several years. Especially when a team like Arizona moved into University of Phoenix Stadium, they had a modern stadium and their look needed a modern feel.

To each their own, but anyways. Didn't the new Browns go with a modern look in 1999? I thought they switched to the modern look with the TV numbers moved to the shoulders and a more modern stripe look. I could've sworn the old Browns TV numbers and stripes resembled the Chiefs prior to their move to Baltimore. Maybe I'm wrong.

Old Browns

pc731.jpglarry-johnson-vs-oakland-thumb-600x419-12977.jpg

New Browns

1500601.jpg?v=1&c=ViewImages&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF1939057D9939C83F1068C0246723D4B36465A5397277B4DC33E

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Especially when a team like Arizona moved into University of Phoenix Stadium, they had a modern stadium and their look needed a modern feel.

That would be sound logic, if the Cardinals weren't the oldest NFL team. As the oldest NFL team it only makes sense for them to have a classic look.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm gonna say there will be very little noticeable difference in about 30 or 31 teams. All of this pandalareum over huge changes and complete rebranding will be looked upon as silly message board talk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I for one don't believe the rumors on here or on uniwatch until I see it. As for the Broncos, wasn't Nike the ones that created their current look in the first place? If so, why would they change it?

1. You shouldn't, unless it has been confirmed by a very reliable source (ColorWerx, Paul Lukas).

2. You're kidding, right? How is Nike going to get attention and make money if it doesn't replace its old designs with newer, shinier designs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I for one don't believe the rumors on here or on uniwatch until I see it. As for the Broncos, wasn't Nike the ones that created their current look in the first place? If so, why would they change it?

1. You shouldn't, unless it has been confirmed by a very reliable source (ColorWerx, Paul Lukas).

2. You're kidding, right? How is Nike going to get attention and make money if it doesn't replace its old designs with newer, shinier, FASTER designs?

Fixed! haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Broncos are deffiently making some changes. Not sure why they are on the no changes list...

Just a guess, but it could be because the entire list is just the opinion of some guy on the internet.

On topic, I agree with BBTV. Unless you have some sort of confirmed inside information, all of this is nothing but pure speculation. My opinion is this: The NFL, and by extension, the teams that make it up, are so freaky about their brand that they aren't going to let Nike "go Oregon" on anyone. Nike is big and they call the shots for a lot of teams in college football, but this isn't college football. This is the NFL we're talking about and the NFL doesn't take walking orders from anyone. That's something we should keep in mind while we're chasing our tails trying to figure out (yet again) what Nike's "plans" are.

Yeah I already made that clear (with a post AND the title itself). It is just some guy's (my) opinion. That's why I said don't take it too seriously.

I for one don't believe the rumors on here or on uniwatch until I see it. As for the Broncos, wasn't Nike the ones that created their current look in the first place? If so, why would they change it?

That's what I said myself. That's why I said it would be a small change because we already know they're switching to orange full time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Especially when a team like Arizona moved into University of Phoenix Stadium, they had a modern stadium and their look needed a modern feel.

That would be sound logic, if the Cardinals weren't the oldest NFL team. As the oldest NFL team it only makes sense for them to have a classic look.

Yeah, but then again, they really don't have to look like the oldest franchise in the league. I mean, if that, why not just go back to that dated cardinal head logo?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.