TCU to unveil new graphic identity Monday April 2nd
#41
Posted January 28, 2012 - 18:39
#42
Posted January 29, 2012 - 01:17
#43
Posted January 29, 2012 - 01:26
andrewharrington, on January 29, 2012 - 01:17, said:
We know.
Horned FROG just seems to roll of the tounge better than Horned Lizard.
#44
Posted January 29, 2012 - 10:26

And yes, that's a horned toad in a casket.

The New Faces of Fort Worth Bombers Baseball - Coming April 2012
#45
Posted January 29, 2012 - 11:40

•_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
•
#46
Posted January 29, 2012 - 11:46
JQK, on January 27, 2012 - 17:20, said:
I immediately thought of the tour guide at the Slurm factory:
#47
Posted January 30, 2012 - 13:00
Buc, on January 28, 2012 - 10:11, said:
Off the top, Oregon, Connecticut, and Florida State have all had either their entire identity or pieces of their identity (read: logos) designed by Nike (in the case of Florida State, both the "unconquered" and alternate Armdad-ish fonts as well as the alternate spear logo). My question is this: does Nike turn the rights to this stuff over to the institutions they design it for, or does Nike still own it? I vaguely remember reading somewhere that although Nike designed that "O" logo for Oregon, the school itself can't produce or sell any of its own merchandise with that logo on it since Nike still owns the copyright. (I'm farly certain the same situation applies to FSU and that alternate spear in that only Nike can produce & sell merch with that logo on it, and that all revenue off that goes back to Nike.) Anyone know anything more about this?
Here's why I'm asking all this: if it is n fact true, then it pretty much only further proves a point several of us Creamerites have been arguing, that being that all these new visual identities that keep popping up are more (if not ALL) about marketing the manufacturer--in this case, Nike--than the schools/teams themselves. ( And I used the word "marketing" for a very good reason.)
Pretty sure that Nike retains exclusive rights to the marks they create for one year, but only on apparel products.
#48
Posted January 31, 2012 - 03:20
any word on the helmets for 2012? i was looking to acquire one of this years lids, but i'd like to hold off if i know change is coming.
#49
Posted January 31, 2012 - 08:05
joegalvan, on January 31, 2012 - 03:20, said:
any word on the helmets for 2012? i was looking to acquire one of this years lids, but i'd like to hold off if i know change is coming.
I have spoken with the president of HGI about that and he says they are not working on anything "officially" for TCU next year, so I assume it will be the same shell as 2011, with a new logo.
#50
Posted January 31, 2012 - 09:29
There have been some big backlashes against modernizing logos at college-level that come to mind (Iowa, Michigan State, Washington are some examples).
#52
Posted January 31, 2012 - 23:15
deliver2david, on January 31, 2012 - 09:29, said:
There have been some big backlashes against modernizing logos at college-level that come to mind (Iowa, Michigan State, Washington are some examples).
Some gnashing because the frog is associated with the current golden age of TCU football. Some don't like it because it is Nike. Some will love it before they even see it because it is Nike. Most waiting to see before judging and hoping it isn't too drastic a change.
#53
Posted January 31, 2012 - 23:19
gdu, on January 31, 2012 - 23:05, said:

tweeted by a recruit. Slightly different template.
Nice jersey...
#55
Posted February 1, 2012 - 00:50
#56
Posted February 1, 2012 - 14:43
IWORSHIPBENDER, on February 1, 2012 - 00:22, said:
That was just a helmet the team wore this year that they set out to show recruits. It is the 2010 pro combat rivalry helmet with the sticker from the regular 2012 helmet (bc of a superstition). Just using it to show recruits. That combo will probably not be worn again and that helmet sticker will chnage in all likelihood.
#57
Posted February 1, 2012 - 18:04
Congratulations, Horned Reptiles...you've just been (anthra)cited.

•_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
•
#58
Posted February 1, 2012 - 19:04
Buc, on February 1, 2012 - 18:04, said:
Congratulations, Horned Reptiles...you've just been (anthra)cited.
I might be one of the rare ones who actually preferred TCU's purple and silver stuff that they wore in the WAC days...so I dont really mind the anthracizing.
#59
Posted February 1, 2012 - 19:06
#60
Posted February 1, 2012 - 19:09
Buc, on February 1, 2012 - 18:04, said:
Congratulations, Horned Reptiles...you've just been (anthra)cited.
Eh. Nike makes lots of stuff to help schools it likes recruit. I won't even think about these until I know they plan on wearing them in a game. TCU has been the best out of anyone as far as I can tell about letting Nike know when it doesn't like something Nike has made.
meetthemets, on February 1, 2012 - 19:06, said:
I have spoken with 2 people who have seen it, but haven't seen it myself. The comments have all been positive, so that is encouraging. Anything you can share with us about it?

Help




















