dbadefense1990 Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 I'm aware and I am serious, hence why I said that... Why would they use the old Nets logo and not the new one if they used the new(er) Bobcats logo?Am I missing something?Yes...clearly this is just some image somebody compiled of all the different teams' logos that they saw on ESPN. People have posted the possible source images for some. If you've watched Brooklyn on ESPN at all this year you'd know that they have their new logo. And it looks just as bad as the others.Here is a different image someone compiled of the ESPN styled logos:Imagine if ESPN adopted these graphic styles to their MLB and NFL coverages. Interesting to see how some baseball and football team's logos would appear if they got the same aesthetic approach NBA teams got here.Hell, it would have been interesting to see the treatment NHL teams would have received from this graphics package, had ESPN retained full hockey coverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Noire Posted May 15, 2013 Author Share Posted May 15, 2013 I'm pretty sure the Nets logo is the new one being shown from a sideways perspective. The ESPN pre-commercial graphics does these 360 degree shots where the "camera" pans around the logo showing the 3D layered "baloon" effect of the logo. That screenshot just happened to catch it at that angle making it look like the old logo.actually it's just recolored. http://payload10.cargocollective.com/1/4/146448/2512046/tl_09_1280.jpgI stand corrected. That has to be old though because they use the new logo as recently as their series with Chicago.Edit: someone mentioned this a few post ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilt Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 The only one that I can agree with is the Miami Heat version. They just don't look right to me. Also, tbh I was fooled by the recolored NJ Nets logo. I'm not sure if the font treatment was too similar or they just recolored it. The shape of the shield gave it way though. The top should be rounder.I would say that Rockets looks good as well. The rim makes a 3D impression of a 2D logo so it's easy to translate. Forcing the script in front of spherical ball, on the other hand, makes it really ugly. And all those animal logos remind me of making old cartoons in 3D recently (e.g. The Smurfs). I can never get used to it and it just looks wrong to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brick Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 Is the re-colored Wizards the actual primary logo? When you go to the web site or look at their floor, the preferred logo seems to be the dc logo with the hand.Can't remember the show but there was an ESPN-NBA program with logos that had animated twirling basketballs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 I'm aware and I am serious, hence why I said that... Why would they use the old Nets logo and not the new one if they used the new(er) Bobcats logo?Am I missing something?Yes...clearly this is just some image somebody compiled of all the different teams' logos that they saw on ESPN. People have posted the possible source images for some. If you've watched Brooklyn on ESPN at all this year you'd know that they have their new logo. And it looks just as bad as the others.Here is a different image someone compiled of the ESPN styled logos:Imagine if ESPN adopted these graphic styles to their MLB and NFL coverages. Interesting to see how some baseball and football team's logos would appear if they got the same aesthetic approach NBA teams got here.Hell, it would have been interesting to see the treatment NHL teams would have received from this graphics package, had ESPN retained full hockey coverage.Actually, in the MLB: The Show games all of the MLB teams logos get the 3D treatment. It looks pretty cool IMO. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsfan0518 Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Something I have never understood about the ESPN 3D logos is the thing they have done with the Grizzlies. Their logo looks like the grizzly bear is holding the ball on the right side. The problem is, there is ZERO evidence of this feature in any of the 2D logos that the Grizzlies have. This false feature always bugs me every time I see them play on ESPN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Something I have never understood about the ESPN 3D logos is the thing they have done with the Grizzlies. Their logo looks like the grizzly bear is holding the ball on the right side. The problem is, there is ZERO evidence of this feature in any of the 2D logos that the Grizzlies have. This false feature always bugs me every time I see them play on ESPN.Where does it look like the bear is holding the ball? There is no ball. There are no limbs/paws. Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsfan0518 Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Something I have never understood about the ESPN 3D logos is the thing they have done with the Grizzlies. Their logo looks like the grizzly bear is holding the ball on the right side. The problem is, there is ZERO evidence of this feature in any of the 2D logos that the Grizzlies have. This false feature always bugs me every time I see them play on ESPN.Where does it look like the bear is holding the ball? There is no ball. There are no limbs/paws.Look at the right side of the logo that is navy blue, and look at the clear spot in the center. I don't know about you, but it looks like the bear is holding some sort of ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockngoalie1 Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Something I have never understood about the ESPN 3D logos is the thing they have done with the Grizzlies. Their logo looks like the grizzly bear is holding the ball on the right side. The problem is, there is ZERO evidence of this feature in any of the 2D logos that the Grizzlies have. This false feature always bugs me every time I see them play on ESPN.Where does it look like the bear is holding the ball? There is no ball. There are no limbs/paws.Look at the right side of the logo that is navy blue, and look at the clear spot in the center. I don't know about you, but it looks like the bear is holding some sort of ball.Didn't see the beaver then, and I don't see a bear holding a ball now. Am I broken or something? Maryland Terrapins Uniform Tracker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TornadoGTS Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Definitely no ball there, just the 3D lighting. Facebook: CustomSportsCovers Twitter: CSCovers Quote No because when the Irish came to Ireland and first came in contact with the leprechaun people, they didn't take their land away and force them to move west. Instead, the two groups learned to assimilate peacefully. However, certain tribes of the leprechaun refused to taint the pure blood and moved north into the forests of Ireland, only to be seen rarely, usually at the same time of a rainbows appearance and occasionally at the factories of Lucky Charms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wonderbread Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Something I have never understood about the ESPN 3D logos is the thing they have done with the Grizzlies. Their logo looks like the grizzly bear is holding the ball on the right side. The problem is, there is ZERO evidence of this feature in any of the 2D logos that the Grizzlies have. This false feature always bugs me every time I see them play on ESPN.Where does it look like the bear is holding the ball? There is no ball. There are no limbs/paws.Look at the right side of the logo that is navy blue, and look at the clear spot in the center. I don't know about you, but it looks like the bear is holding some sort of ball.Didn't see the beaver then, and I don't see a bear holding a ball now. Am I broken or something?That's glare, how he sees a ball i dont know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsfan0518 Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 I wouldn't call it a ball now that I think about it, poor choice of vocab. But this part here looks like an object that is being held, if you consider the dark part to be paws or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Actually, in the MLB: The Show games all of the MLB teams logos get the 3D treatment. It looks pretty cool IMO.Since I like the treatment ESPN gives the NBA, I had to see what The Show does for myself. However, it looks like it's just the raised outline/shadow treatment. Not the full blown 3D, "jumping out at you at all angles" look. Still pretty neat though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Golden One Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Actually, in the MLB: The Show games all of the MLB teams logos get the 3D treatment. It looks pretty cool IMO.Since I like the treatment ESPN gives the NBA, I had to see what The Show does for myself. However, it looks like it's just the raised outline/shadow treatment. Not the full blown 3D, "jumping out at you at all angles" look. Still pretty neat though.CSN also does 3D effects for all their sports coverage. Which I know we have talked about in another thread a couple months back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goforbroke Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 A chance to post these logos I made when I first joined these boards 8 years ago! Making these was a great way to learn about filters and the like in photoshop. (and celebrated by my 1300th post!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordsketor Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Sorry to bump the post but since the 2013 Finals, ESPN/ABC has done not only the 3d logos but they use the studio to use elements relating to the logo, a la Early 1990s ESPN Sunday Night NFL intros.Heres the linkhttps://plus.google.com/photos/115118110053004412228/albums/5968099892892433681 Many thanks to Discrimihater for making the sig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadSeed84 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 NHL Breakaway 98 did this for a few teams, like here the senators has the effect but they didn't do it for the red wings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GFB Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Sorry to bump the post but since the 2013 Finals, ESPN/ABC has done not only the 3d logos but they use the studio to use elements relating to the logo, a la Early 1990s ESPN Sunday Night NFL intros.Heres the linkhttps://plus.google.com/photos/115118110053004412228/albums/5968099892892433681Cool link. Thanks for posting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tv15 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Can somebody find the new pelicans logo in this treatment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordsketor Posted February 8, 2014 Share Posted February 8, 2014 Can somebody find the new pelicans logo in this treatmentSee my page its updated with it...https://plus.google.com/photos/115118110053004412228/albums/5968099892892433681 Many thanks to Discrimihater for making the sig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.