So they made them more bland looking. And exchanged black a color that so many complained about with a color that makes just as little sense. Not impressed.
I don't understand the ones who say that this is a monstrous downgrade. The silver trims are barely visible anyway, unless there's a close up. They might not be perfect, but they are far from being an epic failure.
First there was BFBS, now there is GFGS. I love these uniforms though... don't understand any complaints. Definitely not a downgrade. Only nit picks would be...
- Change of script... I just don't feel it yet. I'm sure it'll grow on me though.
- Gray - no idea why they chose gray but ok. GFGS
- Primary on shorts - I hate the primary logo so that's probably the only reason why.
I am the only one who thinks the Knicks have gradually lightened the orange since the first set of Ewing era uniforms to look more like the Reed-Frazier orange? They always seemed more red than orange:
Perhaps a leftover from when the Knicks added maroon to the color scheme? Lightening the orange has been a change far for the better IMO.
Favourite Logos:Hartford Whalers, plus homer picks of the Mets & Carolina Panthers
Posted September 11, 2012 - 08:03
The mysteriously shortened armhole trim and plain shorts apart from a solid color waistband are the main things the new set has done infinitely worse than that retro.
*Insert obligatory bandwagoning/backslapping of favourite teams successes here*