Jump to content


Photo

base 12 the dozenal system


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 Coast2CoastAM2006

Coast2CoastAM2006
  • The Yes! revolution

  • Members
  • 6,827 posts
  • Joined: Jan 28/06
    • Location:Big Daddy's Pizza

    • Favourite Logos:Islanders Fisherman

Posted February 7, 2013 - 11:56



basically it's an overview of base 12. There's a movement to getting base 10 systems replaced with a base 12 system. Much like in the metric system discussions, would converting to a base 12 system be reasonable? Short term it seems like it would be a nightmare but long term it seems feasible considering some of our measurements are in 12's like dozen, feet, time etc.

Islanders96.png

C2CAM2006 doesn't exist, he is a figment of your imagination.  Now let me ask you, do you know who I am? I'll tell you who I am. My name is Frank Garrett and I work for Duncan Construction and I am the one that is going to tell you that my pen is bigger than yours because I buy my pens from Pen Island.


#2 njmeadowlanders

njmeadowlanders
  • @GoldAsIce

  • Members
  • 5,359 posts
  • Joined: Oct 18/05
    • Location:San Diego, CA / Parsippany, NJ

    • Favourite Logos:New York Mets

Posted February 7, 2013 - 18:13

Yes, 12 appears often in units of measure, but so does 10. It's too late in time to ever get humans to adopt another system. That ship sailed about a thousand years ago or so. Won't ever happen.

65caba33-7cfc-417f-ac8e-5eb8cdd12dc9_zps


#3 Breakwood

Breakwood
  • Allez l'OL!

  • Members
  • 3,615 posts
  • Joined: Dec 23/02


Posted February 7, 2013 - 19:44

Why don't you just adopt the metric system. Its so simple you'd be foolish not to use it.
Posted Image

#4 RyanB06

RyanB06
  • I miss Michelle.

  • Members
  • 2,590 posts
  • Joined: Mar 14/03


Posted February 7, 2013 - 20:49



Schoolhouse Rock FTW.
Posted Image

As you watch more basketball, you will learn to appreciate the difference between "defense" and "couldn't find the rim with a pair of bloodhounds and a Garmin."

meet the new page, not the same as the old page.

#5 Mings

Mings
  • Forever suspended.

  • Members
  • 11,215 posts
  • Joined: Jul 27/04
    • Location:Chicago, IL


Posted February 7, 2013 - 21:18

My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

#6 crlachepinochet

crlachepinochet
  • Expert on the occult, obtainer of rare antiquities

  • Members
  • 2,282 posts
  • Joined: Jun 2/05
    • Location:Buffalo, NY


Posted February 7, 2013 - 21:30

It must be nice if this is what you're most worried about.

#7 Mockba

Mockba
  • Dark Clouds gather.

  • The Man Behind the Curtain
  • 12,405 posts
  • Joined: Nov 30/02
    • Location:Minneapolis


Posted February 8, 2013 - 11:27

It must be nice if this is what you're most worried about.


Why does everyone presume that if someone says they don't like something, they're interested in something, or whatever, that it's what they're "most worried about"? Like, you're only allowed to have one thing on your mind ever?
SupportYourLocalClub.com | 105 years... and counting | KevinJoseph.net | Behance portfolio
POTD 2013-08-22

When it comes to style, ya'll really should listen to Kev.


#8 crlachepinochet

crlachepinochet
  • Expert on the occult, obtainer of rare antiquities

  • Members
  • 2,282 posts
  • Joined: Jun 2/05
    • Location:Buffalo, NY


Posted February 9, 2013 - 05:56


It must be nice if this is what you're most worried about.


Why does everyone presume that if someone says they don't like something, they're interested in something, or whatever, that it's what they're "most worried about"? Like, you're only allowed to have one thing on your mind ever?

OK, poor choice of words, but it seems strange to actually propose something so radical. If it ever happened (who would even have the authority?), it would absolutely destroy the world of numbers. There would be much confusion over who was using it and when they were using it. If you see "100", there would be a lot of confusion over whether it meant 100 or 144. Just the difference between metric and imperial crashed an orbiter into Mars.



Plus, I think their new numbers are stupid.

#9 Coast2CoastAM2006

Coast2CoastAM2006
  • The Yes! revolution

  • Members
  • 6,827 posts
  • Joined: Jan 28/06
    • Location:Big Daddy's Pizza

    • Favourite Logos:Islanders Fisherman

Posted February 9, 2013 - 10:16



It must be nice if this is what you're most worried about.


Why does everyone presume that if someone says they don't like something, they're interested in something, or whatever, that it's what they're "most worried about"? Like, you're only allowed to have one thing on your mind ever?

OK, poor choice of words, but it seems strange to actually propose something so radical. If it ever happened (who would even have the authority?), it would absolutely destroy the world of numbers. There would be much confusion over who was using it and when they were using it. If you see "100", there would be a lot of confusion over whether it meant 100 or 144. Just the difference between metric and imperial crashed an orbiter into Mars.



Plus, I think their new numbers are stupid.


think about what it would do to sports. How would you interpret current and past stats? Player numbers would be affected. Imagine choosing the number as seen on this clock:
Posted Image

Islanders96.png

C2CAM2006 doesn't exist, he is a figment of your imagination.  Now let me ask you, do you know who I am? I'll tell you who I am. My name is Frank Garrett and I work for Duncan Construction and I am the one that is going to tell you that my pen is bigger than yours because I buy my pens from Pen Island.


#10 Mockba

Mockba
  • Dark Clouds gather.

  • The Man Behind the Curtain
  • 12,405 posts
  • Joined: Nov 30/02
    • Location:Minneapolis


Posted February 9, 2013 - 12:46

OK, poor choice of words, but it seems strange to actually propose something so radical. If it ever happened (who would even have the authority?), it would absolutely destroy the world of numbers. There would be much confusion over who was using it and when they were using it. If you see "100", there would be a lot of confusion over whether it meant 100 or 144. Just the difference between metric and imperial crashed an orbiter into Mars.



Plus, I think their new numbers are stupid.


I can't disagree with any of that. It's bonkers.
SupportYourLocalClub.com | 105 years... and counting | KevinJoseph.net | Behance portfolio
POTD 2013-08-22

When it comes to style, ya'll really should listen to Kev.


#11 andycumbee19

andycumbee19
  • Because your nose isn't within two inches of your NOSE...

  • Members
  • 1,310 posts
  • Joined: Apr 12/11


Posted February 10, 2013 - 01:08

My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

HA! John Pinette is awesome!
Posted Image

#12 NoHoJoe

NoHoJoe
  • Member

  • Members
  • 2,447 posts
  • Joined: Dec 26/02


Posted February 11, 2013 - 15:07

Hooray for New Math! New-hoo-hoo Math!
It won't do any good just to review math.
It's so simple
So very simple
That only a child could do it!!!!
BRING BASEBALL BACK TO MONTREAL!!!!


MON AMOURS SIEMPRE!!

#13 illwauk

illwauk
  • Dancin' days are here again!

  • Members
  • 6,461 posts
  • Joined: Apr 5/07
    • Location:Eastside, MKE


Posted February 11, 2013 - 18:44




It must be nice if this is what you're most worried about.


Why does everyone presume that if someone says they don't like something, they're interested in something, or whatever, that it's what they're "most worried about"? Like, you're only allowed to have one thing on your mind ever?

OK, poor choice of words, but it seems strange to actually propose something so radical. If it ever happened (who would even have the authority?), it would absolutely destroy the world of numbers. There would be much confusion over who was using it and when they were using it. If you see "100", there would be a lot of confusion over whether it meant 100 or 144. Just the difference between metric and imperial crashed an orbiter into Mars.



Plus, I think their new numbers are stupid.


think about what it would do to sports. How would you interpret current and past stats? Player numbers would be affected. Imagine choosing the number as seen on this clock:


IDK about anyone else, but I'd love to see guys running around with an X on their jerseys

uwm_banners_zpsbf8ee4c3.png


#14 Coast2CoastAM2006

Coast2CoastAM2006
  • The Yes! revolution

  • Members
  • 6,827 posts
  • Joined: Jan 28/06
    • Location:Big Daddy's Pizza

    • Favourite Logos:Islanders Fisherman

Posted February 11, 2013 - 19:45





It must be nice if this is what you're most worried about.


Why does everyone presume that if someone says they don't like something, they're interested in something, or whatever, that it's what they're "most worried about"? Like, you're only allowed to have one thing on your mind ever?

OK, poor choice of words, but it seems strange to actually propose something so radical. If it ever happened (who would even have the authority?), it would absolutely destroy the world of numbers. There would be much confusion over who was using it and when they were using it. If you see "100", there would be a lot of confusion over whether it meant 100 or 144. Just the difference between metric and imperial crashed an orbiter into Mars.



Plus, I think their new numbers are stupid.


think about what it would do to sports. How would you interpret current and past stats? Player numbers would be affected. Imagine choosing the number as seen on this clock:


IDK about anyone else, but I'd love to see guys running around with an X on their jerseys


it is a possible short term solution if a team should ever run out of numbers and didn't want to use fractions like the New New York Mets. X, Y, 1X, 1Y, 2X, 2Y could work.

Islanders96.png

C2CAM2006 doesn't exist, he is a figment of your imagination.  Now let me ask you, do you know who I am? I'll tell you who I am. My name is Frank Garrett and I work for Duncan Construction and I am the one that is going to tell you that my pen is bigger than yours because I buy my pens from Pen Island.


#15 crlachepinochet

crlachepinochet
  • Expert on the occult, obtainer of rare antiquities

  • Members
  • 2,282 posts
  • Joined: Jun 2/05
    • Location:Buffalo, NY


Posted February 12, 2013 - 07:37






It must be nice if this is what you're most worried about.


Why does everyone presume that if someone says they don't like something, they're interested in something, or whatever, that it's what they're "most worried about"? Like, you're only allowed to have one thing on your mind ever?

OK, poor choice of words, but it seems strange to actually propose something so radical. If it ever happened (who would even have the authority?), it would absolutely destroy the world of numbers. There would be much confusion over who was using it and when they were using it. If you see "100", there would be a lot of confusion over whether it meant 100 or 144. Just the difference between metric and imperial crashed an orbiter into Mars.



Plus, I think their new numbers are stupid.


think about what it would do to sports. How would you interpret current and past stats? Player numbers would be affected. Imagine choosing the number as seen on this clock:


IDK about anyone else, but I'd love to see guys running around with an X on their jerseys


it is a possible short term solution if a team should ever run out of numbers and didn't want to use fractions like the New New York Mets. X, Y, 1X, 1Y, 2X, 2Y could work.

I could see it as an amusing one off for a minor league baseball club. Newest nerd sports fan must-have: player apparel with the numbers in binary or dozenal.

GRETZKY
1100011

JAMES
10111

KANE
1011000