Eye Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 1 is the best.The top of 3 looks like Lowe's and therefore takes it down a few pegs, but even if it weren't for this, it still wouldn't be better than 1.2 and 4 are both terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evil G Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 I pick 4. Looks old-timey. Bruh check out my last.fm And my Rate Your Music Fantasy Teams: Seattle Spacemen (CFA) Signature credit to Silent Wind of Doom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBubba Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 This looks like something a twelve-year-old girl would buy at Old Navy. Nobody cares about your humungous-big signature. PotD: 29/1/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 Is it 100 years or 100 seasons. If my math is right, both are not the same. BTW, I like 3 the bestI know that the years/seasons thing is off in alot of sports, but can it be for baseball? I mean each season there is no carry over to the next year. The season starts in 1914 and it ends in 1914, so wouldn't that match up? I have zero clue I'm just thinking here.100 seasons would be the actual total of seasons played, counted one-by-one beginning with 1. 100 years would simply be the anniversary, 100 years since it opened. The 1st year anniversary would've happened one year after it opened and so forth.This is to commemorate the anniversary or 100 years of Wrigley. Which would make #2 incorrectly designed. https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGiantsFan Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 I like #3 the most. I like simple looks and this one does it's job pretty well. #1 is my second pick because it's also pretty simple, though not as simple as #3. BEHANCE | PORTFOLIO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phutmasterflex Posted September 21, 2013 Share Posted September 21, 2013 Is it 100 years or 100 seasons. If my math is right, both are not the same. BTW, I like 3 the bestI know that the years/seasons thing is off in alot of sports, but can it be for baseball? I mean each season there is no carry over to the next year. The season starts in 1914 and it ends in 1914, so wouldn't that match up? I have zero clue I'm just thinking here.100 seasons would be the actual total of seasons played, counted one-by-one beginning with 1. 100 years would simply be the anniversary, 100 years since it opened. The 1st year anniversary would've happened one year after it opened and so forth.This is to commemorate the anniversary or 100 years of Wrigley. Which would make #2 incorrectly designed.Which was my point and why I asked because #2 would be wrong Go A's! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
final_sun Posted September 21, 2013 Share Posted September 21, 2013 Things like the sign, the scoreboard, the ivy, and "The Friendly Confines" offered a chance to create a simple, instantly recognizable tribute to the stadium. None of the finalists does that. Even just a couple of ivy leaves with '100 Seasons' written in the typeface of the sign would have been more meaningful than these.Of the finalists posted, #3 is the only one I like at all. My problem with most of the submissions on the MLB site is that they prominently feature the Cubs logo - it's the 100th year of the stadium, not of the the Cubs playing in Wrigley (that will be 2016). It was built for Chicago's Federal League team (and is the last surviving park from that league) and home to the Bears for a lot of years too - there really should be a whale and a wishbone 'C' joining the Cubs logo. That won't / can't happen, but probably should have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdAstraKC Posted September 21, 2013 Share Posted September 21, 2013 Do not like number 3 at all. It initially reminded me of these... but crappier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phutmasterflex Posted September 21, 2013 Share Posted September 21, 2013 This is the one unveiled today Go A's! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportstar1212 Posted September 21, 2013 Share Posted September 21, 2013 They made the right choice. I'm pleased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildwing64 Posted September 22, 2013 Share Posted September 22, 2013 I like 1 and 4.2 looks pretty generic and stretches the team logo. 3 looks like something you'd see on a tin of beans. PotD: 24/08/2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generic Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Good choice indeed, not really a fan of 2. or 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheStoicPaisano Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 That logo was all over the place merchandise-wise at Wrigley today.I expect it to be on the 5950s next year, but those were not available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerslionspistonshabs Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 1 or 2. They look the most 'old-timey'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC in Da House w/o a Doubt Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Needs more ivy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadojoker Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 2,3,1,4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Golden One Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 Ballparks @MLBcathedrals 8mThe @cubs will use this logo to celebrate 100 years of Wrigley next year, but the Cubs didn't build Wrigley..@MLBcathedrals 8mThe Chi. Whales of the short lived Federal League did. The @cubs didn't move in until 1916. The Whales logo:(below) With the help of @AsFanByDesign we added a subtle Whales tribute. See if you can spot the change. We like the Wrigley 100 logo. This small change would honor the parks roots without hindering it. If you agree, let @cubs know. TY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infrared41 Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 Needs stripes. Someone had to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 No. I don't care how many hashtags are thrown at it, it's a bad idea. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicageaux Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Now that the whale's been pointed out, I can't unsee it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.