BucksFan5 Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 The new Browns logo may have just been leaked at the combine. If the leak is the real thing, the primary logo will be the dog logo with a dumbbell in its mouth. that's been out for a while, it's iust the strength and conditioning shirt. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bosoxlover12 Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 The new Browns logo may have just been leaked at the combine. If the leak is the real thing, the primary logo will be the dog logo with a dumbbell in its mouth.that's been out for a while, it's iust the strength and conditioning shirt.Exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sport Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 nothing to see there. A lot of teams make t-shirts for their strength and conditioning programs.Here's the Reds' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Noire Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 So most are saying the "new" logo is just an updated helmet. Makes sense since they have a helmet outline as a twitter avatar and have been calling it an evolution. If so, it will probably be the worst rebrand attempt ever. But typical Browns.So they might remedy their lack of a logo by not actually creating a logo. I'll admit it's ballsy. Stupid, but ballsy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YelichGraphics Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 So most are saying the "new" logo is just an updated helmet. Makes sense since they have a helmet outline as a twitter avatar and have been calling it an evolution. If so, it will probably be the worst rebrand attempt ever. But typical Browns.So they might remedy their lack of a logo by not actually creating a logo. I'll admit it's ballsy. Stupid, but ballsy.execpt the fact the president said that the new logo isn't a helemt. doesn't anyone read the sportslogos.net news. like the real site not the fourms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canzman Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 The only thing that article states is a line that says "Obviously, this means the team's helmet will no longer be the primary logo." Nothing I see in the article says that statement came from the team president. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vmd9 Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 Exactly. People just assume a team isn't that dumb to use a helmet as a logo. Only a team as stupid as the Browns would use it for almost their entire existence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panthers_2012 Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 I heard on our local news a couple of days ago that the new Browns logo won't be on the helmet or the uniforms. I'm trying to think of a team in the NFL that doesn't use their primary logo on their helmet or somewhere on the uniform. I would just find that stupid if the Browns did that, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 I heard on our local news a couple of days ago that the new Browns logo won't be on the helmet or the uniforms. I'm trying to think of a team in the NFL that doesn't use their primary logo on their helmet or somewhere on the uniform. I would just find that stupid if the Browns did that, IMO. http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CS85 Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 I heard on our local news a couple of days ago that the new Browns logo won't be on the helmet or the uniforms. I'm trying to think of a team in the NFL that doesn't use their primary logo on their helmet or somewhere on the uniform. I would just find that stupid if the Browns did that, IMO.Eagles. Rams. Quote "You are nothing more than a small cancer on this message board. You are not entertaining, you are a complete joke." twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConcreteCharlie Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 I heard on our local news a couple of days ago that the new Browns logo won't be on the helmet or the uniforms. I'm trying to think of a team in the NFL that doesn't use their primary logo on their helmet or somewhere on the uniform. I would just find that stupid if the Browns did that, IMO. Eagles. Rams. bengals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jungle Jim Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 I heard on our local news a couple of days ago that the new Browns logo won't be on the helmet or the uniforms. I'm trying to think of a team in the NFL that doesn't use their primary logo on their helmet or somewhere on the uniform. I would just find that stupid if the Browns did that, IMO. Eagles. Rams. bengals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackBolt3 Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 I heard on our local news a couple of days ago that the new Browns logo won't be on the helmet or the uniforms. I'm trying to think of a team in the NFL that doesn't use their primary logo on their helmet or somewhere on the uniform. I would just find that stupid if the Browns did that, IMO. Eagles. Rams. Falso. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConcreteCharlie Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 I heard on our local news a couple of days ago that the new Browns logo won't be on the helmet or the uniforms. I'm trying to think of a team in the NFL that doesn't use their primary logo on their helmet or somewhere on the uniform. I would just find that stupid if the Browns did that, IMO. Eagles. Rams. bengals oopsies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 Yeah, the question was, who doesn't have their primary logo ANYWHERE on their uniform... That's the Vikings, for sure, the Browns (until next week)(unless you count actually wearing the helmet as wearing the logo) and...Maybe the Bears? Is this considered the primary...or is it the "C"? http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CS85 Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 It's the wishbone C, technically.edit: 14,000 posts. Wish I would've used it on something more memorable. Quote "You are nothing more than a small cancer on this message board. You are not entertaining, you are a complete joke." twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jungle Jim Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 It's the "C".Edit: Posted at the same time.CS, I just noticed you hit 14K with that post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 Yeah, the question was, who doesn't have their primary logo ANYWHERE on their uniform... That's the Vikings, for sure, the Browns (until next week)(unless you count actually wearing the helmet as wearing the logo) and...Maybe the Bears? Is this considered the primary...or is it the "C"?Do the Vikings not have the logo above the nameplates any more? I always kinda liked that. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamond Dweller Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 Technically the Giants only wear a slightly altered version of their primary logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canzman Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 So if the "logo" will not be on the helmet or uniform doesn't it imply that they will just be using the helmet as the logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.