ARTnSocal

This NIKE Honolulu Blue looks darker, and I don't like them in monochrome blue one bit. I like the older block numbers too. The LIONS should have gone with silver pants and Honolulu blue socks, perhaps with northwestern striping. The RAMS look like LA on the road (pre-1995) again with the bright yellow pants and blue socks, way ta go!! True LA RAMS.

In 1970, the last year that the RAIDERS wore the silver numbers on the white jerseys the numbers were darker. It was more of a silver-gray color. These current ones are a dull silver, so all they've gotta do it make them darker.

It is NOT Canzman's job to post the probable weekly uniform combos, he's been doing it for the members for a great number of years. For you to have the audacity to complain about it, a measly 3 fonts is beyond rude and highly disrespectful. to Canzman. Next week I hope he makes them even larger and in the darkest shade of black. and If you don't like it try doing it yourself but I highly doubt you're capable.

That's true. I've been watching the CHIEFS since the AFL days and other than moving their TV numbers on the jerseys from the sleeves to the shoulders, downsizing the KC decal on the helmet and going from a gray to a white face-mask when Arrowhead was opened they never changed the look of their socks.from my memory. When wearing white pants they'd have on red socks at the top with stripes, and with the red pants they'd have white striped socks. I also used to like their bigger logo they once wore on their helmets, only to somehow downsize it in 1974. Dunno why they felt to do that since they wear no helmet stripe.

I like when Detroit wears the white pants, but ... they ruin the look by not wearing Honolulu blue socks and instead opting for white socks. Not only that but the pants are stripe-less which looks too generic, just like JAX with their white pants.

This thing with wearing socks that match the pants is an eye-sore and getting on my last nerves. I hate the BILLS in mono royal-blue but can at least tolerate it if they were to wear white socks like they did in Dallas on Thanksgiving a few seasons ago, but it just looks so ridiculous when these teams wear matching socks to the color of the pants.

I think Baltimore should always wear the purple pants when donning their white jerseys. Those black stripeless pants are awful.

Word has it that the Lions will be wearing silver/silver/silver and the BILLS will be in white/blue/blue. I wish the socks were white, I hate the leggings look when these teams wear the same color socks as the pants, there's just no contrast.

The BILLS are doing it again for Sunday nights PACKERS game ... Blue jerseys Blue pants Blue socks Source: Twitter (@BuffaloBills)

That won't happen (everyone with multiple helmets) for the simple reason that that NFL said the new policy would be that teams can only have an alternate 2nd helmet IF it's part of a set that goes with a throwback. Example: The NY JETS cannot have a black helmet because they'd never before worn one. Buffalo can only have a white, red, or silver helmet (1960, 1961) .... This is what was said by the NFL when it was first announced.

That doesn't necessarily hold true. From 1965-1968 the pants on the (Washington Football Team) uniforms were closer to a khaki color and looked great IMO. Then in 1969 the pants were modified into a more shiny and brighter mustard yellow for the final season in 1969 before their Lombardi uniform change. Similar to the ones worn in the photo from 2002, I was hoping they'd name the team the 'Arrows' or something like that and use the 1965-1969 uni's that looked just like the ones worn in 2002 for their 70th anniversary season.

I’m sure the Bills will have different masks and revert to the gray ones when wearing the AFL faux throwbacks.

NO .... the BILLS seriously do not. Been there, done that. With the white helmets we had the blue facemask from 1977-1983 before changing to the red helmets. The blue facemask looked good with the white jerseys, but not good when wearing the blue jerseys. It was overkill. I’d just assume stick with the gray masks ... but my main issue are those stupid mono-red color-rush uniforms, I hate them!! Also, the 1965 faux throwbacks should be worn more than just once per season. I’d like to see the return of home throwback, and then have both versions of the AFL look, just like Miami has.

Thurman Thomas ... wearing the uniform of enemy # 1 . . . and without his trademark face-mask

>>>>>> No me ... I think they're great, but they looked better when they wore 'em in 1994 for NFL-75 For AFL-50 in 2009 they made the outline with way too much black (except the sleeved numbers), that's probably why you don't like them.