MattMilone

Members
  • Content Count

    345
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Prospect

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Philadelphia
  1. The interior most material for the font seems to similar to the mesh used elsewhere on the NIKE cuts:
  2. Yeah, the bright red numbers being on the shoulders is a bit crazy. Also, its a bad angle, but it seems like the chest numbers aren't as digital-y? Video Link Below: http://www.buccaneers.com/multimedia/videos/Making-the-Uniform-Behind-the-Scenes/6db023d6-2c97-400d-aae0-3111b41d9518
  3. This sounds kind of awesome. Can we create a kickstarter to make this worth Fraser's time?
  4. I think you already did: Seriously though, I think the shading is a problem, especially when looking at the Jaguars' logo last year. The issues are largely the same: some structural issues (that could/should have been corrected in the editing process) and some odd (i.e., the "clip-arty" complaint) shading choices. I wonder how both of these logos ended up so similar, stylistically. Are both done by NFL Properties, or is the league acting as a guiding hand with whatever designer/studio is making them? And if the answer to either of those is yes, then I assume a number of teams will be seeing very similar makeovers in this light over the next few years. I can't say I like it
  5. It's on the official site though. And that Helmet was rooted from nfl.com Yeah, I literally pulled it from the prod.static site of the Bucs, so I'd assume it's correct? The logo has popped up in a dozen or so different graphics.
  6. Hmmm, found this digging around the Bucs website. Could be some photoshoped nonsense, or maybe its real??
  7. Cool graphic. Especially cool to actually see a Saints jersey in it! But as a long-time CCSLC member, I'm shocked and appalled (tongue-in-cheek) that no one has mentioned what's off, technically at least, in the graphic. Anyone? Bart Starr's NOB? And yes, we should petition this website with the wrath of a thousand suns Edit: bleuet beat me to it
  8. So native americans don't love them selves enough? Thanks, didn't know that. The way non-persecuted people cling onto hilariously irrelevant things is always surprising. One group of people is slaughtered for centuries and forced into ghettos without any chance of the "American" experience that many others are granted solely based on birthright . . . but you know, randomdude512, wants to keep it a sports teams name that exploits that entire situation. A bunch of guys running around a field with an inflatable ball is more important. You obviously have your priorities straight. My priorities is simply...grow some thick skin and quit complaining and trying to change the world to your liking! People get way to offended these days and I can only imagine how crappy it is going to be with future generations. Stop generalizing, be specific. We are talking about the name Redskins, and how it relates to the exploitation of the genocide of Native American people. If a bunch of Native Americans stand up and say it offends them, are you saying they should "grow tougher skin?" Onto something more relevant: are there any links or articles that show any indication about the ownership's feelings or reactions to a potential name change? I've been alive an admittedly short period of time, but have never really seen them say anything about the topic.
  9. So native americans don't love them selves enough? Thanks, didn't know that. The way non-persecuted people cling onto hilariously irrelevant things is always surprising. One group of people is slaughtered for centuries and forced into ghettos without any chance of the "American" experience that many others are granted solely based on birthright . . . but you know, randomdude512, wants to keep it a sports teams name that exploits that entire situation. A bunch of guys running around a field with an inflatable ball is more important. You obviously have your priorities straight.