MEANS

Members
  • Content Count

    1,581
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

231 Utility Player

2 Followers

Profile Information

  • Favourite Logos
    Logos designed: Toronto Maple Leafs / WCOH Canada / WCOH Team North America

Contact Methods

Recent Profile Visitors

9,724 profile views
  1. I think they are both lighter/brighter, my guess is 287/1235 before, at least the yellow is definitely brighter.
  2. It might be close to 40 years old but I grew up on that classic movie.
  3. it started earlier than that....from an article - http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2014/10/pink-used-common-color-boys-blue-girls/ In 1927, Time magazine printed a chart highlighting gender-appropriate colors for girls and boys according to leading U.S. retailers. Filene’s (in Boston), Best & Co. (in New York City), Halle’s (in Cleveland), and Marshall Field (in Chicago) all advised parents to dress boys in pink and girls in blue. Why did they care at all? It is generally thought it was simply because if parents followed such a color scheme, they would have to buy a whole new wardrobe and set of baby accessories in the “appropriate” colors if they had a boy and a girl at some point, rather than just going with reusing the one set for both as before. For reasons unknown, this all started to change around the 1940s when clothing manufacturers decided on pink for girls and blue for boys. It has been suggested that boys simply like blue more and girls like pink more, but studies to date trying to see if this is true have come up with mixed results, except firmly showing that the vast majority of humans prefer blue to pink, and pink is actually one of the adult world’s least favorite colors. (As you might imagine, it’s difficult to perform large scale studies to determine if boys and girls are naturally predisposed to one color or another without the introduction of existing learned color biases, even in countries that don’t popularly follow the pink-girl/blue-boy scheme.)
  4. Our design team at adidas looked into heraldry a lot when we were working on the Vegas Golden Knights project.
  5. DH in both leagues is the way to go, you are not going to change the trend of pitchers not focusing on batting, that would take a long time for the change to take place and with sport specific culture at all time high....just make the DH for both leagues.
  6. I never got the love for these Dallas uniforms. What they have now is so much better.
  7. Rangers/Angels/Mariners/Twins/Braves/Indians/Marlins/Rays/Nationals
  8. See it's not that difficult. This team has such great colors to use and it's finally done right.
  9. they seriously were too lazy to write that themselves for the ad? Had to use a font that looks hand drawn.....instead of just doing it by hand and making it look natural....SMH
  10. Florida's red hasn't change, if ever. I have files (NHL Slicks) that go back to at least 1999 and it's the same red.
  11. They really needed to have the letters D C in there too? They are in the bolts already, otherwise it's my favorite logo of the group.
  12. Ha! I totally forgot about that Ducks OC logo that I worked on....
  13. They are using Leafs (Maple Leaf Badge worn by soldiers in the Canadian Army during WW I) as a proper noun in their case so it has the regular (productive) plural.