MiK

Needs a grey facemask *ducks*

Bettman would insist they keep the Arizona state shaped shoulder patch too - It's a dream market you guys

What, Utah?

Utah Saints - games on Saturday's can be called "Ladder Day" and you get a bobble-head of a saint-ly Joseph Smith wearing a jersey and climbing a ladder made of hockey sticks.

Interesting that its orientation is horizontal rather than vertical. Looks less... official, somehow? Any other teams do that?

Fantastic work - the Lake Superior State and Merrimack redesigned logos are particularly good. The execution on each of these is top notch, well done. The CCornell looks and reads better - without the 'double C' it catches the eye as ORNELL. I wonder if the Mercyhurst home sweaters logo may benefit from a white space between the green text and the blue outline? There's not much contrast between those colors so it kind of bleeds together - you don't get that pop like you do in the away sweaters with the white logo.

Agree. But I am glad to see Oranje back to a more classic orange compared to that yellow-orange they were rocking at the last WC:

Noticed today that the Illinois orange and blue seemed brighter than I remembered. I saw on the main site that the logos and word marks had been updated in 2022 with brighter colors. Curiousity on what rub/hex changes made were, I ventured over to @TruColor's site to find out. Here, the colors remain from the 2014 update. Curious I thought. So I then went straight to the source at fightingillini.com and found something confounding. Their own website conflicts: Clearly the Orange and Blue on the banner of the website are much brighter from the Orange & Blue Colors depicted below. What gives? Has there not been an "official" color change or are they just unsure themselves of what the true colors are. The majority of the website is in the brighter orange and blue but then there's this page, talking specifically about Orange & Blue showing the darker colors from 2014. There were also no RGB, HEX, anything to be found on the website. Irritating!

The league and demographic must sure love gradient I see your point and it's good perspective. To further counter my own point - XFL2.0 went too simple and gave us clip art logos. At least these are thoughtful in their design. Still too many colors for Columbus (-Grey), Omaha (-purple), Orlando (-Grey again!). And seriously, cool it with the gradient.

What is on the right side of the Vamos Gatos logo? A juicer? Those little bathroom dixie cups?

Not wild about any of the franchise looks. New leagues always go too far, too busy, too many colors. Simplify it down - look to the successful pro leagues to create strong brands. No more than two prominent colors, have supporting accent colors if needed to differentiate. Will be interesting to see how LOVB brands compare once those are fully released.

They definitely can score a point. @TalktoChuck was correct that they cannot play front row or block. They can attack but they cannot be above the net when they do so. At high levels of vb, this usually means they don't score points when attacking but it is possible.

There we go.

Yes on the shimmer. It's just so Vegas, and that's why it works. The dark is the better look aesthetically, but the gold fits their environment so much better.

Welp, Nevada legislative session ends with no vote on the A's stadium. Gov can still call for a special session - have to imagine that would only happen if there's confidence the vote would pass.