• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


crashcarson15 last won the day on June 28 2018

crashcarson15 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

2,102 All Star

1 Follower

About crashcarson15

  • Rank
    Resident CRJ stan

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Contact Methods

Recent Profile Visitors

49,147 profile views
  1. Alright, we're done with this veer off topic. Focus on the Browns' upcoming unveiling, please, not blanket assertions.
  2. I don’t believe the images flashing are of the new jerseys, but nevertheless a promising sign that they’re tying this to the classic look.
  3. It’s almost certainly taking the carbon fiber design off the stripes.
  4. This is exactly the type of topic that should be under General Discussion.
  5. Yes, the Browns will be using Brownie more. I'm really starting to believe they won't screw this up.
  6. I don't think the relativity is based on expected success, rather on market size and dynamics. The Indians have been one of the best franchises in baseball over the last 7 years, and certainly fit the "always expect to be a contender" bill right now, but recently reduced capacity of their ballpark (and aren't filling the smaller number either). For about a quarter of the clubs in the league, I'd make the case that if a new ballpark were to be built, it shouldn't have a permanent capacity larger than 35,000. I'd say there are 9 true "small-market" clubs in baseball -- Cincinnati, Cleveland, Kansas City, Milwaukee and Pittsburgh have much lower populations than any other markets in baseball; Baltimore and Oakland are geographically constrained; Miami and Tampa Bay are in the wacky Florida sports climate. For whatever reason, the Brewers draw out their ass and buck the trend, but for the other 8 clubs in that list: The Royals drew 2.5 million fans in 2015 and 2016, the only 2 times they've ever done so The Orioles last drew 2.5 million fans in 2005 The Indians last drew 2.5 million fans in 2002 The Reds last drew 2.5 million fans in 2000; the only other time they'd done so was from 1976 through 1978 The Rays only drew 2.5 million fans in 1998, their inaugural season The Marlins only drew 2.5 million fans in 1993, their inaugural season The A's last drew 2.5 million fans from 1989 through 1991, the only time they've done so in franchise history The Pirates have never drawn 2.5 million fans in a season There's no reason that any of these clubs need more than 35,000 permanent seats in their stadium -- and Miami aside, it's not like these numbers are being influenced solely by bad baseball. Baltimore, Cincinnati and Pittsburgh each made 3 postseason appearances this decade that broke 15- or 20-year droughts; Oakland and Tampa Bay have made pretty regular playoff appearances and have shrewd front offices. That the recent high-water mark for these clubs is the Royals averaging ~33,000 the season after they broke a 28-year postseason drought to go to the World Series tells me that none of these clubs need a park larger than 35,000, irrespective of how good they expect to be. The teams themselves recognize this, too -- Miami and Pittsburgh built their ballparks small; Kansas City kept capacity small in its renovation; Cleveland and Tampa Bay have reduced capacity as they can within their stadiums. When Oakland builds its new park and joins the trend, it'll be appropriate for them.
  7. On the whole, I don't mind this at all -- but the unnecessary (IMO) use of shadows really bug me.
  8. I’ve not had this thought before the post, but I’m starting to think I’d love the Browns to just use that script wordmark as the primary logo, a la UCLA or Zenit in soccer. I love that wordmark— it’s beautiful, classic, and perfectly fitting for the franchise, IMO.
  9. Josef Martínez tearing his ACL in match day 1 really blows.
  10. I actually might love that Spurs shirt???
  11. Can we stop trying to make the Browns look like Ohio State or Florida? The Browns have a decades-old historic look they should return to.
  12. This template is just tough, I think — the kits I like most are the simplest ones, which is never a good sign to me. There's a few kits (Kansas City, Orlando and Portland, most notably) where I really like the design and idea, but feel the template just ruins it.
  13. I don't mind that Galaxy kit, but the break in the light grey sash for a navy blue sponsor is really dumb.
  14. To be fair, Burnley and West Ham wear claret and blue because they wanted to copy Villa.