Jump to content

Digby

Members
  • Posts

    6,652
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

Everything posted by Digby

  1. I actually prefer the numbers as they are on the right chest under the swoosh, but (pet niche interest alarm goes off) I think it would look better if the swoosh and number were moved up, so that the collective unit of the two is what gets vertically aligned with the crest. As it stands, it's the swoosh only that gets vertically aligned with the crest, which makes the number look more like an afterthought and lends a sense of imbalance to the layout.
  2. I used to prefer the darker shades for the USA (still think the 2011 Gold Cup dark red shirt/dark navy sash was an underrated gem, top 3 for them all-time). For this set the brighter colors work well for me though. I don't mind USA teams being loud and bright, for one, and the royal helps extra to offset them from England. Plus, with SO many of the recent USA kits following the template of a plain white shirt with color cuffs and collar, going royal this time out gives us something different. But yeah, agree with the others that the navy printing is a mistake. (Just please never give us the light blue effect of 2016 ever again for something "different", please.)
  3. Well, design is not just art, design is also context and history and community and usability. Something that hits all the right notes technically speaking and fits into the trend boxes of the moment may not fulfill all those other elements. Sports, in particular, is founded upon a certain pride in messy, flawed history for a lot of people. Personally I think that the Twins brand is one of the stronger ones in MLB, centered on the red/blue mix and the quirkiness of the TC logo. The home set is strong because it does the rare feat of expanding on that history in a new way. Losing one of those colors, or losing the TC hat, is a miss for me for that reason (I know there's a history of M hats but I didn't like those either; this gets into the debate over whether a team should have multiple cap logos or not. I say no, mostly.)
  4. Yeah, I'd agree with that -- nudging the color balance toward navy and the front number would've helped. That or the curly-W only on the front, though that's not my favorite look (more of a beveled-DC guy I think). Obviously they've gone well into the realm of confusion, regardless. One other thing I still want to complain about re: the Twins is that, while the home looks great and has grown on me for the reasons others have beat to death already, it also looks a little bit lonely in the overall set, given the away set's abandonment of the TC and the script, and the City Connect (which is worn too much) losing the red. I know uniform set-wide cohesion and consistency is an outdated concept but it bugs me.
  5. It's hard to say that anyone looks "similar to the Nationals" because they've changed things so often that they don't even look similar to the Nationals. If anything, gold/mustard trim felt more Nationals-y (the Twins had dibs on that script/color treatment decades earlier) but the Nats didn't keep that, either.
  6. Where was it, Denver that they had to drag out the corner clocks from some dusty storage unit last year, when the real clocks were on the fritz?
  7. I don't get it either. The double outline blurs everything, the typeface is dull and has a weird V shape, the husky dog in the logo of that time looks like he's old and panting like a mouthbreather. Their late-90s look was corny, but much more memorable and interesting. I still place the Wolves as a team that doesn't have a "look" that they need to own, they haven't found the perfect thing yet, so I'm fine with them being one of those teams that just rebrands every so often. Not everyone can be the Celtics or the Bulls, as I've mentioned as a hobby-horse of mine before. I think their current logo package would be more than salvageable if the core home/away uniform set didn't miss and if they hadn't forgotten about the green.
  8. Today in MLS unseriousness: New England somehow has home-field advantage (e.g. hosts second leg) of the next round of Concacaf Champions Cup against none other than Club America. But they have motocross at Gillette Stadium that week so the team asked to swap the legs so now they’ll voluntarily play the 2nd leg at the Azteca. oh and 1st leg in Foxboro is on a Tuesday at 9pm. Feels like they’ll be lucky to keep the aggregate goal differential in single digits.
  9. But how could you say no to games where one team's at home and one team's been traveling for three weeks, and also the rules are different for some reason??
  10. Mexico has done black home kits so frequently in recent cycles that this doesn't even register to me. As a federation they're clearly not into the tradition at this point, so whatever. Lots of nice designs and interesting color choices here but the template is just horrendous.
  11. Wonder how many of these we're going to see this year. I made sure to sell my Revs vs Miami tickets early on just to safely lock in those profits.
  12. People celebrating the 4th? 5th? death of Deadspin as if it's a grand act of justice and not just private-equity doing its usual work. I don't really understand what value the brand held at this point. Surely anyone who liked Deadspin for Deadspin followed the staff to Defector and that was what, three years ago? Who's even been reading the thing?
  13. If anyone ever brings us back to late-90s-ball it should be the Knicks, so that checks out.
  14. Believe Chase Center is one of those basketball-layout-only type of arenas. Can't quite tell this with certainty, but it seems like their fancy VIP areas near the court would preclude an NHL-sized ice sheet. Is the Cow Palace still standing? I also think -- and prognostication is a bad idea I realize -- that down the road, the sports industry will eventually view its abandonment of the Oakland market specifically as a mistake. It looks bad on paper but it's kind of a unique confluence that three different teams (two incompetent and bad-faith, one competent but too techbro-desperate) bailed without a fully fair shot.
  15. Every American transit system outside of New York is very hub-and-spoke though, no? To LA’s credit, they are building out their transit system right now at a scale that I didn’t think was possible in post-1970s America. At least that’s how it looks to me. Though things don’t connect the way they should. I was almost excited for a train to LAX option.
  16. Vermont is number one on this list, which is a searingly obvious tell that the methodology is too flawed to take seriously. Real numbers say SLC's public transit usage is pretty anemic. Not really out of the ordinary for American cities but I'm not seeing this as a special selling point necessarily.
  17. Nike has done a similar thing where they debut a new template and highlight that template as obnoxiously as possible. Limited bespoke design, brash colorways that may or may not be appropriate. Then that template grows a little old and everyone settles down, and that seems to allow design that seems more successful on a team-by-team basis. This Adidas batch is not just a shift away from MLS but from what they were doing for like, the Women's World Cup last year. Seems to have subsequently been a pretty significant design philosophy change at HQ. Hopefully they get sufficiently roasted for it.
  18. Minor subject change but: I was surprised MLS agreed to put a team in Snapdragon, and this W Gold Cup semifinal in the rain tonight unfortunately is not a great showcase for it. Drainage on this field is roughly level with your median high school field. Worse than that snow game in Salt Lake in terms of anti-soccer.
  19. Oh boy, those swoopy butt stripes are beyond hideous. This template will go down in history infamously as the Speedo silhouette.
  20. I've imagined it would end up being something like, MLS 1 gets to be in Leagues Cup and MLS 2 doesn't. Maybe they get to be the bone thrown to the US Open Cup, at least the American teams. But that would get logistically dicey given the MLS geographic element that other soccer leagues mostly don't have, and even if it doesn't carry the stink of true "relegation", I just don't see any group of owners consenting to a system where they won't have a guaranteed date on the Messi World Tour/its sequels, or miss out on the big funds of Mexican fans that Leagues Cup is designed to provide. Feels like those big spectacle business models are designed to wean MLS off the expansion fees and toward something that, idk, "sustainable" doesn't feel like the right word here but you know.
  21. Would be cool if Barclays hadn't done it 12 years ago/if we knew these things aren't just giant, obnoxious billboards for advertisements. For NYCFC anything is an upgrade, but ick, that stadium is looking like those big square modern cheap-luxury apartment buildings that everyone hates.
  22. An armadillo-baseball concept is kind of cool but the prospect of that as the basis for a creepy, uncanny, bastardized A's rebrand is nauseating.
  23. The other benefit to 40 -- and this has never seemed to be a rumor, only speculation from online people, but it does make a lot of sense to me -- is that it would allow for MLS to form two tiers with pro/rel between them, but not outside of them. Is this likely to happen? I kinda doubt it, I think there are more "against" than "for" reasons that I can think of, even when I put on my cynical capitalist suit as a thought exercise. But I would never totally rule out MLS doing the sort of thing that looks like "traditional world football" on the surface but is actually the Mickey Mouse version.
  24. So that's one group escaping the inconvenience, cool, but it's still a nuisance of a policy, especially for women who are more likely to rely on (totally reasonably sized!) purses and bags. You can't get into a Bruins game for less than $150, why treat customers like schoolchildren? (Just kidding, I know why, there's a $15 bag locker truck (but only at one corner's entrance) and the beers inside are up to $18 this year.)
  25. I am so, so tired of gigantic screens bigger than the playing surface. Everyone has tiny screens and then there's also huge screens. It's all too much.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.