Jump to content

mafiaman

Members
  • Posts

    1,406
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by mafiaman

  1. 23 minutes ago, FiddySicks said:


    Yeah, that’s surprisingly where I’m at as well. The black gear just kind of gives them the same problem the Buccaneers have with their current set, in a sense. Trying to imitate the original look, but just missing the mark. Gives it sort of a dime store, discount brand vibe. The all teal was the way to go. 

    Sorry, that’s WAY too much teal for my taste.

  2. 2 hours ago, SSmith48 said:

    The Seahawks wearing Action Green tonight reminds me that I don't hate the color, it's just better if it's used marginally as an accent color. Dressing a team head to toe in it is just straight-up nauseating.

    And players think that’s a GOOD look?

  3. 1 hour ago, CreamSoda said:

     

    I get that, but why do the Colorado Avalanche, with an already mountain themed name and 3 Stanley Cups,  have to pay homage to a prior franchise that relocated?  A franchise that lasted 7 years with no success?  It's not the same. 

    7 years with no success?  They were in Quebec from 1972 to 1995 and were the #1 seed in the 1995 playoffs only to lose to the #8 seed Rangers in the first round of that season’s playoffs.  

  4. 2 hours ago, DarthBrett said:

     

    Yep. They also wore them on the road last year as well for 1 game against the Giants in early September. Maybe they plan on wearing them against division rivals only on the road...?

     

    spacer.png

    NFL Color Rush meets Major League Baseball Latino Pandering Night. 

  5. 19 hours ago, LA Fakers+ LA Snippers said:

    The battle flag logo was lowkey underrated, IMO. I thought this was the best logo of the set, and it was the most underused. You only saw it on Fox Sports Ohio broadcasts or on second-rate sports sites like Fansided.

     

    spacer.png

    spacer.png

    Go Cleveland Buccaneers! 

    • Like 1
  6. 3 hours ago, gosioux76 said:

    I was watching the Bucks/Lakers last night and my impressions of the Bucks' City Edition unis really took a plunge. I thought they looked terrible. Just way too much going on there. 

     

    I've always liked the Irish rainbow look of the Bucks, but forcing purple and one tiny little royal blue panel into the mix is overkill. I also hate how the pattern repeats on the shorts. I'd rather they lose the purple from the jersey and let the green continue seamlessly onto the shorts. Instead, it goes green-purple-green-purple. Looks disjointed. 

     

     spacer.png

     

    Also, while I recognize that the wishbone collar is an homage to their prior uniforms, it really looks terrible on this jersey. When these were released, I didn't mind them. But watching them in action, they were a real eyesore. 

     

    Mashing up 17 eras into 1 jersey doesn’t work.  Most of these concepts are brutal - the Rockets, Bucks, and Nets being among the worst.  

    • Like 1
  7. 2 hours ago, andrewharrington said:


    Why would adidas be forcing teams to add a stripe to the top of their jerseys? This stuff is straight from Twin Cities history books…

     

    spacer.png

    spacer.png

    Wait, so Adidas has been doing this for almost 100 years now?  
     

    I cannot believe they’re still trotting out the toilet seat collars though…

    • Like 1
  8. 4 hours ago, CDunn said:

    These are the same unis they've been wearing all season just with the new logos. Here's what they looked like before.

    spacer.png

    You mean other than the Gemini Athletics logo in place of the Bauer logo and yellow COLORADO COLLEGE in place of white lettering on the front?  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.