slats7

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    893

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

117 Utility Player

Recent Profile Visitors

4,339 profile views
  1. slats7
    Not sure why that Cowboy rep referenced 2012. The pants had the usual greenish tint that year.
  2. slats7
    I barely detect a change. And the pants for the millionth year still don't match the patina of the helmets.
  3. slats7
    MOD EDIT
  4. slats7
    Dumb. Sixty isn't a milestone anniversary like 25, 50, etc.
  5. slats7
    Still ugly as sin. You'll never be able to fuse brown and orange successfully.
  6. slats7
    So Dallas had the option of wearing white but opted for a dark on dark matchup? WTF?
  7. slats7
    depends on the lighting. and seafoam green is an official color.
  8. slats7
    Look at the helmet, then look at the pants. Case closed.
  9. slats7
    If you can't see the blue tint, I can't help you.
  10. slats7
    Place a Dallas and Oakland helmet side by side and you'll notice the difference. Nor do the Giants use metallic blue: https://teamcolorcodes.com/new-york-giants-color-codes/
  11. slats7
    HD video really brings out the differences. The shell of the helmet is metallic blue: The home pants are seafoam green: The road pants are silver, though not a true silver like the Raiders: In short, an absolute mess.
  12. slats7
    Dallas has two sets of pants that don't match the helmets. Amazing even for them.
  13. slats7
    btw, how do we embed tweets?
  14. slats7
    https://twitter.com/jonmachota/status/1160776487160561664 Strange that they'd opt to wear blue at home vs the Vikes and Rams. I wonder if the Skins are back to their "make Dallas wear blue" tricks.
  15. slats7
    Yes, since '64. I'm not sure why a narrow black strip bothers a lot of fans. The green pants are waaaaaaay worse. They really affect my enjoyment of the team.