The Impaler

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6 Prospect

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Fort Worth, TX

Contact Methods

Recent Profile Visitors

4,190 profile views
  1. I don’t know. While I really appreciate the creativity of it, I feel the monogram is off. The E could almost read as an F and the whole symmetry is way off when in the diamond. Furthermore, if you’re bent on using the tree frog I’d almost rather have the identity flipped. Tree Frogs being the name and maybe EC as the secondary. JMO of course. I hate criticizing any of your designs as they’re in general just fantastic.
  2. Wow! It’s been awhile since I’ve perused the concepts forum. This thread is a delight. I love all the identities but the Mets one stands out to me. Maybe it’s because I’m a Husker fan and like the simple two tone uniforms. 1 color and white. It’s not my favorite name per se, but the whole thing is just great.
  3. I know the Denver rumor is likely false. I haven’t seen or heard anything about the switching. But I would absolutely love it if they did this. Minus the chrome face mask.
  4. I'm not a big fan of the new monogram, especially the gap between the C and R. Did you consider maybe just having a C? It's such a thick font that I think just having a C would fill plenty of space on the hat. Not exactly in love with the font though. Love dropping black completely, good call. Like the overall uniform aesthetic. On the word mark, the spacing in the ROCKIES is really bothering me, it rather looks more like R O CKIES to me.
  5. The coolest thing I've seen for the Browns, hands down. Would you be thinking of this as a helmet logo too? I'd like to see uni's and whatnot for this.
  6. I can nitpick with Nebraska. Hate the slashes thru the stripes, not enough red, why does grey or black have to be added to everything? Other than that, one of their better looks. Someone on the Husker board was trying to tell me (when I took exception to the stripe slashes) that it's because their logo is 3 stripes. Um. okay. Not sure I buy that one. Even if I did it's still a lame design element.
  7. Buffalo: Perfect Miami: Love the inclusion of more orange, would change the facemask to aqua though and I think the numbers would look better outlined in orange. Jets: Love the jersey but it seems out of place striping wise with the helmet and pants. I think it would look better if the helmet and pants striping mimicked the jersey. Also agree that the NY needs something. Pats: I have never understood silver for them. They should be RW&B imo. Not sure I like the difference in the jersey and pants striping.
  8. They don't paint field turf. The "grass" is manufactured in that color. Then they come in and shave out the numbers and place them in. Same with the word marks and logos.
  9. I'd love to see this on a more current template. This is pretty darn good, not sure on the orange facemask, would have to see it on the field to make a determination on that.
  10. I couldn't disagree more, I think there was plenty of contrast between the old blue and the orange. But I wouldn't mind more of a Boise State blue, little richer of a royal blue but not the near black that the navy is. That's what drives me nuts about their current shade. Just way too dark.
  11. Broncos simply need to combine the eras. Keep the current logo as the primary, do an update to the D logo with the Bronco stylistically similar to the new logo and use it as a secondary logo. The current shade of orange is perfect but lgo back to royal blue, a richer version than what they previously had so it doesn't look faded. Current font is fine but switch up the striping. I saw someone do it here before where the jerseys were a throwback to the days when the orange jerseys had blue sleeves, that would be a great place to start.
  12. Can you do this but inverse the numbers so that they're orange with blue outline?
  13. I really like this look. The blue socks are a must with it though. It's far superior to the all blue look they break out. It just drives me nuts how dark their blue is though. It's almost black when looking at it on their helmets. IF they made no other changes I wish they'd at least go to more of a royal blue.
  14. Well, I disagree. That doesn't even look close to navy to me. Now, then end zone isn't even painted per this video at the 1:43 mark. Someone screwed up somewhere.
  15. So check out this video and scroll to the 1:43 mark. Denver's endzone, which was the first graphics to be painted on the field (less the numbers, etc) has gone from navy blue to not painted. What is going on here? edit: ok, not sure how to insert a video on here. Just go here and watch.