Jump to content

Jinjoe

Members
  • Posts

    260
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Jinjoe's Achievements

0

Reputation

  1. Wrong! Kelly green looks great on the Celtics, the Canucks and looked way better on the Dallas Stars when they used to use it. Not too mention the North Stars... some of the greatest jerseys ever to see the ice His opinion... Despite my username, I'm actually not HUGE on Kelly Green, my love is for dark green. Kelly Green generally only works for me as a secondary (Celtics being a rare exception), which is why for example the Canucks homes are 1000x times better than their roads to me. For example, I love the A's current identity, but the original Kelly Green and gold looked borderline awful together. I'm fine overall with Kelly green for the C's, but I certainly wouldn't mind seeing them move towards a forest green, or maybe even a shade similar to the Eagle's Midnight green.
  2. Uh, no. The Celtics logo is a classic, it doesn't need replacing. Oh please. It's a poorly rendered, childish cartoon. The shamrock logo is a classy, iconic representation of the team name. Exactly even when I was a kid I always thought it was kind of lame and cartoonish looking.
  3. NOOOOOOO! Their current uniforms are fine (home and road). As for a modern logo, they have their shamrock alternate logo. No gold and no black please, even on the St. Patty's day jersey. If the Celtics insist on having an alternate jersey with another color into the mix, the only acceptable route would be to go two-tone green. Two-tone green? Similar to this? That wouldn't come remotely close to looking as good as either the green/black, or the green/gold alt. I forgot about the shamrock logo though, that one is a good look, and I personally would like to see that, or something similar to that become their become their primary logo.
  4. I'm as big as a Celtics fan as they come, but I would love to see them finally do some sort of modernization to their uniforms,and logo. Maybe work some gold in somewhere, beside the alt that they wear sometimes around St. Patrick's Day.
  5. Eh, it could start a terrible trend. If one team does it, pretty much every team will jump on board to get in on the money craze. I really don't think the NFL needs more alternate-anything right now. I highly doubt most teams would jump on board even if it was allowed, particularly teams with a lot of tradition, for example Cowboys, Steelers, Packers, Browns. But for teams that have a lot of historical capital like Jags, and Panthers and don't have as easy of time getting noticed (outside of winning of course) it could possibly help, in this regard.
  6. I don't know if this has been mentioned in this thread before, but I think it could be a good idea for the NFL to allow the use of alternate helmets for teams that are willing to put them to use.
  7. I said earlier in this thread that the 2002 - 2010 Bills uniform were a pretty good look, and I preferred them to the previous set. This was said before they came up with the new 2011 versions. So now having the chance to get a good look at their brand new set, not only do I still prefer these: 2002 - 2010 over these pre - 2002 set I also prefer them over their latest set.
  8. I think the current Bills set blows away any previous set they ever had, especially the retro set they wear from time to time. I also think the same as for the Vikings.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.