ltjets21

I think it is the new shade of "Gotham Green". When we were hunter green nobody seemed to make a stink until it looked like army green with the new nike template. As far as the gotham green I don't mind it but find it looks different depending on lighting. Without a doubt when I go to games the gotham green jerseys are rarely seen amongst the fans. The entire look as a whole just reminds us all of the Gase years.

As a Jets fan I can tell you the fanbase hates the green. Whenever Woody tweets about uniforms everyone moans and groans everytime we are set to wear green. I assume the only reason we wore them vs the Eagles was oddly so they could not claim our color at home? Just speculation. Lets just hope we bring back the 80s set full time. Personally the only aspects of the current uniform I dislike is the "new york" on the front and the pant striping.

The Navy helmets are gross. They are so dark they almost look black and they don't match any other part of the color rush or the throwback uniform.

I wonder if they stripped the old numbers from last years uniforms and put on white ones or just purchased new ones. Does nike even make this template anymore?

I think something like this would have to be utilized. Reliant in Houston used to bring grass in on trays but those also presented their own issues. I know the Rogers Centre tried to have grass about 5 years ago but it wasn't plausible due to the concrete floor. I assume a few other indoor stadiums like the Superdome might face this issue. I think it would have to be weighed if the tray system is safer than turf. I agree every stadium should have grass, but growing up in the 2000's everyone always wanted to play on field turf. The real horror stories were from the astroturf days.

May be just lighting but I think last years blue looks closer to the Reebok blue than the current blue. Could need to take a look at the color palette though.

Is it just me or is the blue from last season closer to the reebok electric blue? Wasn't the goal to do the opposite?

I think this would also help in situations like the Jets where we have two different helmets that are pretty equally beloved by fans. The bills could also keep the standing Buffalo alt and their red helmet. Im sure there are many other examples like the Chargers, WFT, and others but this was what came to mind first.

I agree with this wholeheartedly. I know all throwbacks with block numbers and stripes look good but at a certain point it gets repetitive. Thats why I have always preferred the logo on jersey sleeves. I think the best solution is the Cowboys stripe stripe with the star on their navy jerseys.

I dont understand the oval with the throwback word mark. It should just be the old school helmet at the 50.

As a Jets fan the entire fanbase is hankering for this full time and I think Woody is going to bend. In my opinion I think they would slide the Jets logo in between the sleeve stripes similar to how the Bears use GSH. I could also see the current number font transferring over. If it were up to me I would go back to the 2000's uniforms with the current green but as long as they ditch the awful stripes on their pants and jerseys i'm sold. Also the NEW YORK on the front is terrible. Also nothing against your concept but my one gripe with the throwback is I think the pant stripe stinks.

Every part of me wants to hate the Colts alt but for some reason I love them. I also love the Lions lanky lion helmets but they look awful with the charcoal uni.

Yes but that was just a rare situation where they kind of ran with the NFL 75th anniversary promotion. Their primaries that year and the year after were the classic unit they won the other 4 super bowls in.

For green tack on at Dallas and likely at Cleveland when they wear their White throwbacks. I don't know what the rules are because they always change but right now they listed 2 Legacy games Vs Buffalo and KC as well as, Black Friday Blacks vs Miami.

Not arguing but making a point how many teams have won a super bowl in two distinctly different looks? I'm not talking the Packers different sleeve stripes or the Steelers block numbers. The Giants and Rams are the only teams that come to mind and I'd even consider the Rams a modern take on the 99 look. At the very least no franchise has won a super bowl in two different helmet colors. Most of this is championships being won by historic organizations who prioritize history over fads.

They don't own colors.

To me it seems like they are doing it just so the Texans cant lay claim to the identity in any way. How will they look now if they introduce a faux back similar to these?

This is where we have the battle of historical accuracy vs looks. I think the Giants throwbacks look terrible because the helmet is so dark it almost looks black.

I still wonder if we are going to get this Jets "Tribute" helmet with a throwback uniform. Seems late to hear this little murmurs.

I would've preferred a throwback to this era as well. I almost expected it as well with it being 25 years since their '98 team.

In my opinion there is nothing really wrong with these. Much better than the previous two years and more in line with the Home Run Derby Jerseys of the past. The only issue is them replacing the team uniforms everyone loved so dearly.

I was lead to believe it would be a tribute helmet. This would mean it would have the green shell they currently use but with the retro facemask and logo. However, since we haven't seen anything this late in the game maybe it has been scrapped.

Overall a lot of Royal teams seem to randomly claim navy. The Knicks statement jerseys are Navy for no reason. The Blue Jays powder blues have navy hats and accents as well, which looks specifically bad because those are their Division Rivals colors. Spare me that the beak on the Blue Jay is Navy. Hell, I even remember the Cubs used to have a navy BP uniform. All this is basically as bad as BFBS in my book.

I think the Raptors winning in jerseys that say "North" might've been worse than the T-shirts. Just so cringe at trying to be cool.

Yes....but this on the other hand is atrocious.