daniel75

Why can’t the Vipers find socks that match a color on their uniforms?

The Packers uniforms and logo are waaaaaay overrated. 

Thought the Dragons looked really good in their white’s.

St. Louis looks way better on television then any of their promo stuff looked.

40 minutes ago, bowld said:

Tampa at home looks to be the worst look in the league. Just awful

Vipers look awesome, for an XFL team especially. Houston looks much better on the road also. 

1 hour ago, IceCap said:

Yep. 

Ha ha that’s funny.

21 hours ago, IceCap said:

The Seattle Dragons' colour scheme reminds me of a perfectly fine, if somewhat underwhelming, Tommy Hilfiger shirt.

You mean one of those long sleeve, thick\heavy, overly large ones from the mid 90’s?

I really like the Vipers colors but maybe a dark green helmet with the snake head logo would be the way to go. Otherwise I see no problem. The Guardians would obviously look better with different colored pants.

I’m not sure there’s any really bad uni’s in the entire league.

8 hours ago, gosioux76 said:

I get it. From a purist’s standpoint, this is a logical take. But most uniform purists don’t have any skin in the game. And we’re also the types to collectively mock these spring football leagues that fail after a season or two. 
 

If convincing Bud Light to fork over thousands of dollars to stick a small logo on the back of a helmet helps keep XFL around a bit longer, I’ll deal with it.
 

Looks won’t matter to a dead league.

Agreed, it maybe a necessary evil for a start up league.

Just awful, ads need to stay off of uniforms. They look terrible.

XFL is a bad name. Considering the X doesn’t stand for anything since legally they cannot use the name Extreme. Not that that would make sense anyway since extreme doesn’t begin with an x. Its a league without a real name, it’s also attached to a history of failure and embarrassment. Having said that I hope they do well, I just think they would have been better off with a different name, or an actual name.

None of these teams are independently owned correct? I imagine when they have ownerships a lot of these designs will change.

Why does xfl’s merchandise blow so hard? I would purchase a Vipers hat but they look like something you’d buy at a gas station.

I take it back they actually just got new merch that actually looks decent.

1 hour ago, IceCap said:

Tampa's road look is nice. It's the home version where it all goes sideways.

For me it’s the pant stripe, just awful.

This looks pretty decent in the sun. Though I still prefer the Guardians uni’s, I think these might be my second favorite.

5 hours ago, Volt said:

 

I am now officially off the XFL bandwagon.

What a debacle.  Vince just couldn't help himself.

 

This was your breaking point? A refs uniform, I mean come on. They’re not that dreadful anyways.

nvmd 

These are the correct rankings btw.

N.Y.

D.C.

Dallas

Tampa

L.A.

Houston

STL

Seattle

I’m sure it’s been mentioned but one of the problems is how similar all these uni’s look. 

This monochrome crap needs to stop.

1 minute ago, Volt said:

White helmet isn’t bad.  The rest is an absolute debacle.

 

They sure blew it.  I really want to know who was behind these designs.  

Honestly thought they’ve all been decent until these.

Holy crap the Dragons look horrific.

Vipers need to put the V on the sleeves and the snake head on the helmet.

Vipers look fantastic from the waist up. But the aways are unbalanced needs more lime green to help balance the helmet.