BigBubba

While not without flaws (cartoony logo, inconsistent outlining, side panel on the home jersey), overall, this is a good uniform set:

I've always pretended that it was "We, the north..." to make it sound more palatable.

A swooshing blob has personality?

Aw, there was fun to be had here!

A major flaw I have with the Braves' set that most people don't seem to care about... Sorry, but that triple placket piping looks atrocious. Along with the outlined, cursive script and the tomahawk, it clutters the front of the jersey way too much.

Good Lord, check out that NOB. Who the hell thought that two outlines - with the second, thicker one being the same as the base colour - was a good idea?

If you can't recognize the player, you likely don't know who they are. And if you don't know who they are, how would being told their name make a difference?

Question, mods: Would it be possible to instead just delete bad posts instead of simply editing out all the text?

Basically this. Fake Edit: I totally didn't even notice there are 12 guys in the council. Illuminati and stuff man.. More like this:

How long until someone cites the First Ammendment?

Ehh, to me, pants piping looks weird when there's none on the jersey.

Not forgiven.

I actually agree. The maroon and athletic gold is a great look.Is that unpopular? The Cavs have a top-three look in the NBA in my opinion.

Also: Do warnings have an "expiry date"? For example, if somebody got off to a rough start and racked up a good amount, would they stick with him indefinitely? It might be an issue if he cleaned up his act and was trouble-free for say, six months, yet still had those warnings looming over him, which wouldn't be very reflective of his current standing as a member.

Completely agree. What a wasted opportunity to get some beautiful colours in there.And I'll echo what JQK said. I like big and flashy rings, but there comes a point where they get so big that you can hardly even call them "rings" anymore. Have some fun, but keep the size at least moderate.

That's pretty much what I thought when the Warriors announced their intentions to build a new arena, way back in 2012. We might even see a rebrand (no way that they keep the San Jose name if they permanently move to SF, unlike their temporary stay in the Cow Palace), which would be welcome in my book. I'm attached to the Sharks' name and general logo/colour scheme. San Francisco Sharks works.I'm fine too with the Sharks moving to San Francisco and keeping their identity intact. Though they should start working with the Warriors soon to get the arena to fit a hockey rink, so we don't have another Islanders-Barclays Center fiasco.Why? They're far from even being considered for relocation.

Yeah, choose yellow and brown or orange and brown. Not all three.

Road pinstripes are one of the few baseball fads (if you can call them that) that I wish had staying power.

The Blue Jays sell them at their team shop for less than the price of a brand-new authentic.

Why not get some coffee and an order of TimBits Timbits which comes with two free tickets?

A Hall-of-Famer who played his entire career with one team, led them to back-to-back championships, and is the greatest player in team history? Yes, it absolutely counts. The point isn't the team, obviously. The point is that his correct uniform is this one: Still doesn't make it his wrong uniformBut it does.This argument just shows how badly this thread has degenerated from its original point.When the majority of people think of John Elway, they picture him in the old uniforms. Ergo, those are the "right" uniforms. Now, follow along with me: another uniform, since it wouldn't be "right", would be "wrong". Sure, it may not have the "Holy crap!" factor of, say, Bobby Orr as a Black Hawk (was that before it after the name change?) because he had some hilight moments in them, but it's not his primary uniform. Comprondez-vous?A person can have more than one right uniform, and that is the case here. He led that team to back to back championships and that is what a lot of people remember him in.I don't follow the NFL too closely, so you know what, if many people actually do associate Elway with those uniforms, then I rescind my comment. That said, my point still stands about how the "right team/wrong uniform" scenario can still exist (which one poster seemed to refute).

A Hall-of-Famer who played his entire career with one team, led them to back-to-back championships, and is the greatest player in team history? Yes, it absolutely counts. The point isn't the team, obviously. The point is that his correct uniform is this one: Still doesn't make it his wrong uniformBut it does.This argument just shows how badly this thread has degenerated from its original point.When the majority of people think of John Elway, they picture him in the old uniforms. Ergo, those are the "right" uniforms. Now, follow along with me: another uniform, since it wouldn't be "right", would be "wrong". Sure, it may not have the "Holy crap!" factor of, say, Bobby Orr as a Black Hawk (was that before it after the name change?) because he had some hilight moments in them, but it's not his primary uniform. Comprondez-vous?