Jump to content

gosioux76

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,865

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Everything posted by gosioux76

  1. gosioux76
    A drunken tailgater giving the finger with one hand and whipping batteries at opposing fans with the other.
  2. gosioux76
    Condors.
  3. gosioux76
    The entire Juice set is phenomenal. Well done!
  4. gosioux76
    As I've gotten older, I've come to prefer the '47 Brand "cleanup" style, which is a snapback. I only buy fitted if it's an on-field authentic.
  5. gosioux76
    I have that hat and wear it often. The '47 Brand also made a version of the batting helmet design using the updated logo last year, but they only sold it in the team store. (I was already buying too much at the Target Field team store and later regretted not getting it while I was there.)
  6. gosioux76
    Juice, by a mile. I think the Snowbirds concept is inventive, but a snowbird to me isn't a bird. It's a retiree from a cold-weather city. Maybe give the bird a walker and have them playing canasta?
  7. gosioux76
    What is this “expansion list” and who keeps it?
  8. gosioux76
    I don't understand this sentiment at all. If I'm a baseball fan in a market without its own team and suddenly I learn that one's going to play there, albeit temporarily, I'd be beyond excited. I'd go to as many games as possible because it's a helluva lot easier than taking a flight or planning a road trip to Denver, Phoenix, Seattle or San Francisco, which would be the closest MLB cities from SLC. That's just accounting for the convenience of it all. Now say you're a city, like SLC, that thinks it's big enough and deserves to be a big-league city. In addition to being a baseball fan who is excited to see some games played locally, you've added a component of civic pride to the equation. It's even more powerful if you think going to those games, and showcasing that civic pride, increases the chances of getting your own team full-time. If you're SLC, there's absolutely ZERO risk in this and all upside.
  9. gosioux76
    That's exactly why Salt Lake is so willing to be a temporary host. The MLB may not want them now, but a year or two of performing as strong hosts of a vagabond MLB team would do a lot to change the minds of big-league brass.
  10. gosioux76
    Sacramento. Call them the NorCal Condors.
  11. gosioux76
    Wolves
  12. gosioux76
    If you try really hard, you could take a leap and guess that the new road uniforms were inspired by the early 1950s road uniforms of the Washington Senators before that franchise relocated to Minnesota. I'm not saying that's the case, because the differences are vast, but it wouldn't surprise me. If anything, I'd prefer the Nats do what the Yankees and Dodgers have done and go with a simple, single-layer "WASHINGTON" road uniform as if the franchise dates back to the early 1900s.
  13. gosioux76
    Nobody's denying that Bennett, McClendon, et. al, had an agenda in attempting to procure a team of their own. Speaking only for myself, I was responding to a comment that a market playing the role of stopgap host for a nomadic franchise isn't a good indicator of their capability of hosting a full-time franchise. In the case of OKC, no matter the intent of the business leaders, you can't claim the fans came out to support the franchise out of some subsersive plot to steal another market's franchise. They came because they wanted to, thereby aiding the notion that they can be a good pro sports market. No doubt, the OKC owners deserve all of the hatred directed their way by Seattle fans. But you can't deny that OKC showed up even when the team wasn't theirs.
  14. gosioux76
    I'm elated for Joe Mauer. I love seeing a homegrown prospect reach the Hall.
  15. gosioux76
    I agree. It's hard to deny that the design, particularly during the Griffey era, was and remains attractive. It's just become too muted and drab. In general, I've always liked the Mariners look, save for the weird blue-and-yellow transitionary period between the Trident M and the Compass S (Let's call it the Harold Reynolds era), and the more recent past, when they leaved heavily on the Navy jerseys. Part of me wishes the current S logo wasn't so good so we could wish back the Trident M logo. I loved that logo.
  16. gosioux76
    Now I see the fancy language.
  17. gosioux76
    I'll use this opportunity to point out that I still don't see any fancy language.
  18. gosioux76
    The crawdads concept is by far the best. I appreciate the sentiment around "plunder," but I find the name awkward, as if it should be "plunderers." It makes me think, "what's a plunder" in the same way I once asked of Minnesota's hockey team, "what's a wild?"
  19. gosioux76
    True but Namath-era Jets sounds a lot better than the Mark Sanchez-era Jets or the Rex Ryan-era Jets. Maybe split the difference and call it the Butt Fumble-era Jets.
  20. gosioux76
    The way you describe it, I think I'll try putting a white outline around myself. Seems as if it would make me look younger and more vibrant.
  21. gosioux76
    ... only to replace them with a road uniform design they wore for all but 7 of their 27 World Series titles.
  22. gosioux76
    But it certainly wouldn't hurt if SLC residents were to adopt a temporarily nomadic A's franchise as their own for a couple seasons, not to prove a point but just because they happened to enjoy the experience. I seriously doubt the people of OKC showed up to support the Hornets to carry out some organized regional strategy to prove they were a major-league market. And they probably didn't need the experience of hosting the Hornets to show they had a good fan base. But it sure seemed to help the cause.
  23. gosioux76
    Could this be the first example of a team using another city as leverage over the new city it used as leverage over its current city? As much as I'd hate to see the Athletics name go away, there's a certain symmetry to the idea of them going from the A's to the Bees.
  24. gosioux76
    I watched some NBA analysis on ESPN in which Kendrick Perkins seemed to be openly pushing for the network to get more Timberwolves games on national TV, since Anthony Edwards has become a nightly highlight reel. I'm a T-Wolves fans since the day they got the franchise, but outside of the best KG years in the early 2000s, I never really expected — as someone who hasn't lived in Minnesota for 25 years — to see much of them on national TV. (And until this year, they haven't been good enough to consider the expense of League Pass.) I've always been a bit frustrated by the national TV schedule, which makes a 30-team league seem like it only has a dozen teams. I understand why these schedules have to be made in advance, and that they're done so largely on speculation, market size and relative popularity, but it's still frustrating to see a national TV rotation littered with one of Boston/Philly/Denver/Brooklyn/New York/Dallas/Miami/Phoenix/LAC/LAL/Milwaukee/San Antonio when the T-Wolves might be the league's most fascinating and entertaining story of the year.
  25. gosioux76
    That would suggest that the league has investors underwriting the operation to the tune of tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars. Until they disclose who's paying the bills, then it's just like @Sec19Row53 said: it's fantasy sports.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept