slapshot

Arial Black.

Stop, both of you. Now.

Pretty sure it's part of the DIN family. A bunch of the different weights are here: https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/fontfont/ff-din/ and on my desktop somewhere.

That's the Boston College font, it's custom.

For proprietary and copyright reasons, he had to take the fonts offline. In most cases, those fonts were intellectual property of their original owners, and even though some of us may be crafty enough to extract the letterforms from PDF files to recreate the fonts, it was still a violation, and he could have been faced with legal action.

It's a modified version of Franklin Gothic. The 1's have been changed to look like capital I's.

Not necessarily. I believe companies like Nike, Adidas and Under Armour contract their uniform manufacturing to third parties, who apply the corporate branding to them. I think Nike's are made by Powers Athletic, and Adidas' by Ripon Athletic. At least, they used to be; Reebok used Ripon, my guess is that Adidas would do the same. These third parties might be selling their uniforms to other distributors. I've seen uniforms in Broncos templates made by many different uniform suppliers, for example.

Script is similar to Brody Script http://www.urbanfonts.com/fonts/Brody.htm Transport is similar to Frutiger

Is there an explanation for the darker turf patch between the 40 and 35 on the bottom left? I've seen that in video clips (as well as seemingly-perpetual water stains on the turf).

That looks very bold, but I think it would look better if the logos were screened back and the wordmarks went on top of them. Either way, they couldn't be used unless there was another color border to separate the logos from the white boundary lines.

Puma: Geogrotesque https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/emtype/geogrotesque/ GDNA: Clarendon https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/bitstream/clarendon/

Couldn't find any info in the release, but the top and bottom logos look like the work of Flynnagain. Can anyone confirm?

Looks more like Hoefler's Tungsten http://www.typography.com/fonts/tungsten/overview/ Also known as the font from The Walking Dead. The font in the Material Monikers card looks very similar (bot not exact) to Emigre Senator Tall http://www.emigre.com/WebFonts/Tall-Pack/Senator-Tall

Emigre Matrix http://www.emigre.com/OT/Matrix-II

Thankfully, they abandoned their original plan for "Girls Night", with the front of the jersey featuring the scene where Alison Williams receives analingus at the kitchen sink. Zosia Mamet will still be given free admission to "Bark in the Park" night.

The updated font is Supermolot.

I've missed most of this thread, but as a former AHL season ticket holder, allow me to chime in... Admiral made a huge point earlier...the AHL isn't about winning championships. It's about developing players at limited cost. When Lowell had a team, it worked out well for travel costs. There were 7 teams within roughly a 2-2 1/2 hour drive (Manchester, Portland, Worcester, Springfield, Hartford, Providence, Bridgeport.) While it becomes incredibly boring from a fan's perspective to see the same teams all the time, it was very cost-effective to have nearby opponents. And when you have close rivals, you also draw rival fans, which increase your own attendance. It's funny everyone has mentioned the Calgary/New Jersey model of cutting costs. Both were Lowell's affiliates at one point, New Jersey especially for the last three seasons. As of right now, Manchester will be an ECHL affiliate next year. I think that franchise will lose a lot of fans. It's not like theres nothing else around, but it will be hard to cultivate a low-level rivalry when the nearest opponent is over three hours away. Doesn't make for a lot of last-minute visiting fans to help fill the seats. At least in Lowell, it was an option to head 30-45 minutes to either Worcester or Manchester to take in a game. Another person here asked about the level of ECHL competition compared to the NCAA. I say it's even at best. There are players in Hockey East who are NHL prospects, and when the NCAA season ends, most will sign Part-time TryOut (PTO) agreements for at least 10 days. It's possible it's due to the geographical proximity, but I think it's because Division I hockey is a good preparation for the AHL. Someone else mentioned travel costs, and brought up the Alaska Aces. Teams cover travel costs for their opponents. For the last 6+ years as a franchise, Lowell never played more than 12 different opponents. The owners were too cheap to pay for trips out west. Even though teams like Houston, Rockford and Omaha would travel to New England and play Worcester and Manchester, they skipped Lowell, which is right in between the two cities. Lowell's ownership would not spend the travel costs to send the team out West. The furthest opponents that would come to Lowell were Norfolk, Hershey, and Wilkes-Barre/Scranton. Binghamton visited once. Syracuse and Rochester were unseen since the early years of the Lowell franchise. Lowell lost its franchise in 2010, and the arena was purchased by UMass-Lowell. A lot of renovations were done, including more luxury boxes, video display/message boards, etc. I have also moved out of Lowell, about 25 miles away. If Lowell was to get an AHL team again, I'd definitely take in a few games, although my season-ticket days are most likely behind me.

"Horse Power" looks like United Sans Bold (maybe Semi-Condensed).

Legend M54. http://www.dafont.com/legend-m54.font

Coronation and Sarah Burke are Helvetica

Avant Garde

When there were more contests on this board, members would create duplicate accounts for the sole purpose of voting for their own concepts. People create a second account when they forget all the login information to a previous one...it happens, we're human, not a big deal. But creating a second account for voting, post padding/flooding/spamming, or to get past a previous punishment will create an immediate banishment of all those accounts, and even the I.P. if necessary.

It's been stated board policy to not tolerate dupe accounts since 2006.I just saw that thread in this subforum. While it forbids multiple accounts, it lists a punishment of two weeks. The first suspension thread of this guy says a full ban.You sound like you're trying to defend him, (or her) If a person has an account suspended for behavior, and says "fine, I'll just continue to visit here from a different account", that's against the rules. If people aren't mature enough to behave themselves on an internet message board, they get punished. What does it day when you have to create another account to get around a suspension or banishment? It says you aren't mature enough to be a member anyway. Or you're a troll. Either way.

Specifically, a second account was created to bypass a previous suspension.

It's a no-win situation for the mods. For the longest time, we heard complaints that the mods were too complacent, they let too much crap happen without acting on it, they didn't act on things fast enough, or were this group of insiders with their minds set on discipling a few certain people while letting their friends get away with whatever they wanted. Now that there are new mods, with a fresher perspective on handling board issues, we hear complaints that the mods are too visible, there's too tight a leash on everything. Above all else, this is Chris' board. He was generous enough to create a message board where people can talk about sports uniforms and logos, first and foremost. All other side forums are just ways to enhance the experience and world of sports logos, but not to talk away from the primary focus. Chris has trusted the mods to help keep the board running smoothly. That includes deleting comments and threads that go off-topic, and to issue disciplinary actions as necessary to members who continue to act in ways antithetical to the purpose of the boards. Don't like it? You don't have to visit. Other members have started their own message boards when they didn't like the direction things were going here.