Jump to content

Sideline08

Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Sideline08's Achievements

0

Reputation

  1. The NCAA gives a ring which is the one that is silver and a garnet stone that says "National Champions".It's the same every year(stone changes according to school colors). The "FS" ring is the ring the school designed.
  2. Pic of all of the late AD at Alabama Mal Moore's championship rings and watches . This is on display at the Mal Moore Athletic Complex in the front lobby. VERY impressive display. Google Mal Moore trophy for more pics http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BWumEnnCcAAiwT9.jpg:large
  3. I like our SEC ring better than the school issued National Championship ring this year. Wonder what next year's will look like? Roll Tide
  4. The 2003 Marlins World Series Rings made by Intergold weighed in close to the 115 grams of 14K Gold that Jostens made for the 2006 Heat title. The rings are very close to the same size as both are MONSTEROUS in SIZE. Most people couldnt wear them and i understand most do not wear those 2 rings. Intergold was bought out by Jostens so they now work together and I do find it a shame that a Basketball ring (Heat 2006) and a Baseball ring (Marlins 2003) are way bigger than any Super Bowl Ring. I doubt if the new Ravens Ring will come close to it. Even the Last few Stanley Cup Rings mostly made by Jostens/Intergold were bigger than most super bowl ring. The only real chance i see that a Super Bowl team would make a super big ring would be if the Pats would have won the 2007 Perfect Season Ring and that never happend. And they lost again to the Giants so we will have to wait for a 4th Super Bowl winning ring from the Pats but when and if they do watch out it should be HUGE as every Pats Super Bowl Winning ring since the first has been larger than the prevous one. Maybe they will finally win it this year!!! If not I hope the team who wins makes a HUGE Guady Ring!!!! So what happens to that 2004 USC ring (from the team that won the 2005 Orange Bowl vs. Oklahoma and got their NC stripped)? Is it a rare ring whose value shot up because of the title stripping, or is it only worth its scrap value? The 2004 USC Team only had the BCS Title Stripped from them. They did get a separate 2004 BCS White Gold Ring that would represent winning the BCS Championship. I have had a few of them over the years and are popular with a small amount of collectors. With that said you could consider that ring to be special as no one ever had to give up their 2004 BCS Rings and the rings are now a memento of a stripped Championship and one could argue it could be worth more but I don’t see it being worth more than it was a few years ago. The ring you see in the photo above is from what we call the "School Ring" that the Schools design and gives out for the championship. The School Ring is by fare more in demand than the BCS Rings which all look nearly the same as the design is basically the same every year as its given out by the NCAA and the top of the ring's stone color is the only thing the team changes out otherwise its the same old ring that every team gets from the NCAA every year. So if the AP would have pulled the 2004 Title from USC the 2004 USC Ring I have pictured above might be considered more valuable but it all depends on who wants them or not. As a side note in 2004 Auburn and Utah both finished the regular and bowl season Undefeated. Utah lead by Urban Myer couldn’t claim the title based on a weak schedule but Auburn did finish the regular season Unbeaten and don’t forget they are from the SEC. In 2004 USC and Oklahoma both finished the regular season Undefeated too. Auburn got left out of the BCS Title game. Auburn could have won the AP or a share of the National Title if they had played a better Sugar Bowl Game. They only beat Virginia Tech 16-13 it was not a convincing win. On the other hand USC Destroyed OU 55-19 in the Orange Bowl and OU scored 9 points in the 4th quarter so it was a real statement game. If the final 3 teams were in this same situation these days Auburn would prob be assured the title shot based on finishing the SEC Undefeated and they prob would have played the defending national Champs USC (they shared the title in 2003 with LSU) and OU would have been left out. After the BCS Stripped USC of the 2004 BCS Title and the Crystal Trophy they could have rewarded the trophy and the title to another school like OU, Auburn or Utah but they decided to vacate the BCS Title in 2004. Now if Auburn would have beat down VT they prob would have split the polls much like USC did in 2003. OU had no claims to the title as they were beat bad by USC no matter if Reggie Bush was playing for the team that was the main reason why they got stripped. USC prob would have won anyway. I didn’t hear Utah claiming they should be awarded the title but I did hear some at Auburn who thought since they got shafted and didn’t get to play in the title game they think they deserve the title instead of USC. But do any of you think that Auburn would have beaten USC that year?? In the end believe it or not Auburn did put out rings from that 2004 season and on them they did put "NATIONAL CHAMPIONS" on them. I am sure it didn’t make USC happy at that time but that’s how it goes. Today those 2004 Auburn Sugar Bowl "National Champs" rings of which I own one of them too does go for decent money even though its not officially a National Champs ring as they were not voted or awarded the title by the coaches or the writers. that 2004 auburn "ring" will be worth as much as their 2010 ring.....not much at all. Tried to claim one in 04,severely tarnished one in 2010
  5. They still have not received them yet. I think the hope is they get them before they go on summer break which is the end of this week
  6. Georgia got SEC East Champ rings. Lol Haven't seen pics yet
  7. I think Alabama got their national championship rings today
  8. I am pretty sure the most they can cost is $425 each
  9. Anyone ever heard of mysportsring.com ? If so,how are their replicas?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.