Dan O'Mac

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dan O'Mac

  1. I think that if you put it next to his name, it definitely works. But in a vacuum, I wouldn't know who that was supposed to be, and I'm from Green Bay, so Brett Favre is pretty identifiable to me.
  2. I suppose I'll need to request it since I don't see it... show me Wisconsin vs Miami (FL) in the Orange Bowl!
  3. As it was a secondary logo, it looked very similar to the primary, so I eliminated it pretty quickly because of that. Overall, it's a very good bulldog logo, however, and as previously mentioned, looks very UGA.
  4. See, and I like the Hawks logo WITH the black.
  5. When I got down to my votes, because this was definitely in the running, it was stripe on the shirt that led me to eliminate it. The stripe itself was great, but would be marred by the sponsor logo that the team would add. So I feel that there could've been a solution that would've let that stripe shine even after the sponsor.
  6. Gold: 13 Silver: 14 Bronze: 6 And is that Pucky the Whale in #9?
  7. I can't shake it, even though I don't think there actually is an issue, I can't not see the letters in Wilmington seeming "off", almost like they were added after, and are quite on a straight line.
  8. I LOVED this uniform. I felt it perfectly captured minor league baseball. It was easy to identify what you were going for, and it was a perfect "absurd" alternate that teams are utilizing.
  9. I loved this. The number on the back is a touch too big, and I don't think the number on the front was needed. But for an alternate uniform, this was really good.
  10. My biggest complaint with your uniform was that it just looked to "Cincinnati Reds" to me.
  11. It needed some pop and sizzle. It's a perfectly acceptable jersey, but nothing that would set it apart from the crowd.
  12. I did vote for one of these (the Sockeyes) and not the other (PFF). The League Logo was the PFF one, and honestly, it got lost in the group of logos that all used the RWB scheme. However, I don't know if the different color scheme would've set it apart in a way that would've garnered more votes. I like the color scheme you chose for the Sockeyes more than the Sonics scheme. And, again, I did vote this in my top 3. It was a good identity, it has a unique uniform without being "gimmicky". I think a red uniform might've been a touch better, if only so the striping on the side matched the fish in the logo.
  13. Honestly, I really liked this one. The secondary logo on the shorts looks great with the striping, the script is nice. I'm not a huge fan of the drop shadow on sports numbers, but that's my personal preference. I think you could've cleaned up your presentation, as your white jersey does blend into the background a bit.
  14. I also didn't get the poncho reference, but my lack of vote came from the "MXC" on it. I prefer to see the team name (Calaveras in this case) on the home uniform, and I needed to nit-pick a bit to get those final 3.
  15. I think this logo was a classic case of not knowing what the designer was going for. Without knowing, this looks like a shadow of a classic dome to me. And that's what knocked it down in my case. If I see a dome, I don't think of a specific sport, and definitely not football (I'm from Green Bay, I want my football outside).
  16. I don't dislike this, but what I think would've helped would've been something to make the words/acronym a part of the logo, and not just added underneath the logo.
  17. And it's exactly those details which make the Logolympiad so hard in and of itself. You added a nice detail, that does help the design with the subtle touch.
  18. I didn't dislike this, but one critique I had was "Aquilas". In Spanish, eagle is "Aguila", aquila would be Latin. Not a knock on the design, of course. As for the design, it found to be solid, but unspectacular. It's a good set for a throwback with how the striping looks, at least to me. So I think what would've helped is a more modern take on a uniform.
  19. I think it was just a bit too simple, and the shorts were a negative for me. I didn't like that they had both the lightning bolt and the back panel. But that was just my personal preference.