-
Posts
476 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by mad43dog
-
I'm almost positive it was Colts Broncos in 2004 at RCA
-
Forgot about them. My bad Tejada did for one game
-
pretty sure 00 use to be allowed in the NFLJim Otto
-
And then this happened the next year
-
I love the Laker drop shadow
-
I agree with this. I think those look good in a vacuum, but I generally dislike throwbacks that look nothing like the current set. I think at least some of the hate those get is because people don't think the Jets should look like that.Edit: The Eagles' blue and yellow jerseys are another example. I normally like bright colors like that, but it doesn't look like the Eagles to me. First thing I thought of
-
This. So much this.However I would way rather see long pants than stirrups So you'd rather players look like complete tools instead of a little silly? I assume you do not wear pants? I actually like stirrups, but only the low cut kind.
-
I can't find a picture, but the Lighting played the North Stars in the first and last year of the respective teams
-
Players in the "wrong" uniforms
mad43dog replied to larrypep's topic in Sports Logo General Discussion
Oh, that's a good'n. How about Mark Rypien...Philadelphia Eagle? I guess this is wrong too -
That made me think of the 1996 Eagles. First year with new uniforms, last year with Russell
-
(throws punch)...(connects)...(gloats in defeat over unconscious body)
-
The Bucs got close, if they went for a look similar to the Rutgers one I posted, more rustic and weathered, then I think their idea would have worked. The problem with their identity is they overdesigned it, like a Volkswagen, it's too clean and doesn't have enough soul.The Bucs unis are too CLEAN?Lolololololololololololololololololololololololol Clean ≠ Good Pirates are stereotypically dirty, the Bucs uniforms however, are not. The numbers remind people of an alarm clock, digital clocks weren't invented until 200 years after the existance of pirates. I mean you're not wrong, but there is no way anyone actually interpreted my post as meaning those pirates Just looking for a few laughs
-
The Bucs got close, if they went for a look similar to the Rutgers one I posted, more rustic and weathered, then I think their idea would have worked. The problem with their identity is they overdesigned it, like a Volkswagen, it's too clean and doesn't have enough soul.The Bucs unis are too CLEAN?Lolololololololololololololololololololololololol Clean ≠ Good Pirates are stereotypically dirty, the Bucs uniforms however, are not. The numbers remind people of an alarm clock, digital clocks weren't invented until 200 years after the existance of pirates.
-
This had to only happen once
-
The CCSLC has complained about way more stupid stuff than that. I get it's the right place to do it, but there's things people hate on here that I didn't even know existed until it was pointed out. I guess I don't have a keen eye
-
I think stripe consistency is a downright stupid thing to complain about
-
Players in the "wrong" uniforms
mad43dog replied to larrypep's topic in Sports Logo General Discussion
-
Our Constitution starts the same way
-
Dan Connor is my favorite example with that badass neck pad
-
I like the stripe on these
-
Once upon a time
-
Players in the "wrong" uniforms
mad43dog replied to larrypep's topic in Sports Logo General Discussion
Which of these is right? -
Players in the "wrong" uniforms
mad43dog replied to larrypep's topic in Sports Logo General Discussion
So wrong -
i think the nfl should only have 14 teams. Sort of like the 60s.
-
What I find more fascinating is the huge gap between each letter of 'Epps.' That's why I originally posted this on the other page... I actually liked the way his name was spaced out on the back. I remember watching a replay of 'The Drive' and I remember seeing a player for the Broncos with 3 letters and I remember how spaced out it was.Edit: After research, the player's name is Clarence Kay.